![]() | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
![]() | Warning: active arbitration remedies The contentious topics procedure applies to this article. This article is related to the Arab–Israeli conflict, which is a contentious topic. Furthermore, the following rules apply when editing this article:
Editors who repeatedly or seriously fail to adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, any expected standards of behaviour, or any normal editorial process may be blocked or restricted by an administrator. Editors are advised to familiarise themselves with the contentious topics procedures before editing this page.
|
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Fakhri 'Abd al-Hadi. Please participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. signed, Rosguill talk 18:28, 4 February 2020 (UTC)
There is no valid source for: In 1937 he testified to the Peel Commission, "There is no such country [as Palestine]! ‘Palestine’ is a term the Zionists invented! There is no Palestine in the Bible. Our country was for centuries part of Syria." The source listed merely states this with no reference to any primary source or even a valid secondary source. There is no record of al-Hadi saying this. Mcdruid ( talk) 19:28, 30 August 2022 (UTC)
Also, the statement "Abd al-Hadi was a moderate who was prepared to negotiate with members of the Yishuv" sounds fishy, when he stated to the Peel commission: "Near the end of his testimony the Commission asked Auni Bey if he would be willing, for the sake of peace, to sit down at a British Government-organized roundtable conference with the British and Jewish sides. Auni Bey’s answer left no room for doubt: “The Arabs do not admit the existence of the Jews as Zionists at all... we utterly refuse to meet at the same table with any persons who call themselves Zionist Jews”.
I don't get those two statements to fit together, frankly. And while the second statement is "straight from the horse's mouth"; what is the first statement based on? Does anyone have the Eisenberg & Caplan book? Huldra ( talk) 23:04, 7 September 2022 (UTC)
![]() | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
![]() | Warning: active arbitration remedies The contentious topics procedure applies to this article. This article is related to the Arab–Israeli conflict, which is a contentious topic. Furthermore, the following rules apply when editing this article:
Editors who repeatedly or seriously fail to adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, any expected standards of behaviour, or any normal editorial process may be blocked or restricted by an administrator. Editors are advised to familiarise themselves with the contentious topics procedures before editing this page.
|
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Fakhri 'Abd al-Hadi. Please participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. signed, Rosguill talk 18:28, 4 February 2020 (UTC)
There is no valid source for: In 1937 he testified to the Peel Commission, "There is no such country [as Palestine]! ‘Palestine’ is a term the Zionists invented! There is no Palestine in the Bible. Our country was for centuries part of Syria." The source listed merely states this with no reference to any primary source or even a valid secondary source. There is no record of al-Hadi saying this. Mcdruid ( talk) 19:28, 30 August 2022 (UTC)
Also, the statement "Abd al-Hadi was a moderate who was prepared to negotiate with members of the Yishuv" sounds fishy, when he stated to the Peel commission: "Near the end of his testimony the Commission asked Auni Bey if he would be willing, for the sake of peace, to sit down at a British Government-organized roundtable conference with the British and Jewish sides. Auni Bey’s answer left no room for doubt: “The Arabs do not admit the existence of the Jews as Zionists at all... we utterly refuse to meet at the same table with any persons who call themselves Zionist Jews”.
I don't get those two statements to fit together, frankly. And while the second statement is "straight from the horse's mouth"; what is the first statement based on? Does anyone have the Eisenberg & Caplan book? Huldra ( talk) 23:04, 7 September 2022 (UTC)