This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
Avro Canada CF-100 Canuck article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
![]() | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Please stop adding the machine guns. The specifications are for Mk.5 which did not have this armament. Differences between variants should be delineated in the "Variants" section or on a separate "Variants" page if warranted by space.
From MoS Wikipedia:WikiProject Aircraft/page content
Note that these specifications should relate to a specific variant of the aircraft, and be labelled accordingly. Usually this will be the most famous/noteworthy/numerous one.
Thanks! - Emt147 Burninate! 19:22, 19 March 2006 (UTC)
I added this:
based on a book I've read on the CF-100. There's a diagram or picture of a Canuck fuselage with wide-chord swept wings, captioned CF-103. As far as I know, she never got off that paper. If anybody knows more, please include it!
Also, I've seen references to "Velvet Glove" missile trials. Am I right those were for Sparrow? Trekphiler 10:13 & 10:15, 20 October 2006 (UTC)
The CF-103 progressed to wooden mockup stage before being cancelled. The Velvet Glove was a Canadair project that was cancelled before it was to be considered as armament for the CF-105. The Velvet Glove test flight aircraft included the CF-100 and Canadair Sabre. I'll write more when I get a chance. Bzuk 11:42, 20 October 2006 (UTC)
A number of image files have been deleted recently that are posted on a few pages that I watch. This article and the CF-116 article are the ones that I remember. I don't know how to back-track deleted images to see why it was done, so I have no idea why they were deleted. After the fact, a user has removed the dead files from the infoboxes here and on CF-116, but didn't bother to attempt to replace the images. I don't know if this users had anything to do with the original images being deleted or not. That's all I know. - BillCJ 01:51, 21 January 2007 (UTC)
- BillCJ 01:51, 21 January 2007 (UTC)
I know no one is going to believe me, but I saw a Cluck from the window of the library at Laurentian University, obviously returning to CSFB North Bay. I entered U in 1985, and I believe I saw the aircraft the next year, but it could have been as late as 1989 when that library was closed. Either way, it was several years after they were ostensibly "gone" from North Bay in 1981. Maury 22:14, 8 March 2007 (UTC)
The comment(s) below were originally left at Talk:Avro Canada CF-100 Canuck/Comments, and are posted here for posterity. Following several discussions in past years, these subpages are now deprecated. The comments may be irrelevant or outdated; if so, please feel free to remove this section.
*needs references |
Substituted at 01:09, 22 May 2016 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 5 external links on Avro Canada CF-100 Canuck. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
{{
dead link}}
tag to
http://www.capa-acca.com/vintagelist/vintage_aircraft_list_4of4.htmWhen you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{
Sourcecheck}}
).
An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 16:26, 22 October 2016 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Avro Canada CF-100 Canuck. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{
Sourcecheck}}
).
An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 06:18, 11 November 2016 (UTC)
Do we need this section? I followed the link and the page has no mention of the CF-100 that I could find. If the a/c is alluded to somewhere in fiction or "the media", maybe the Aircraft in fiction page should be updated accordingly- BC talk to me
Note 1 simply shows "Rossiter 2002, p. 63" Can anyone tell me what reference is being made here? If anyone fixes the reference, could they please inform me at pat@hyperion.co.nz? Thank you. I am unable to understand how the four tildes provide a signature: reading the documentation appears to state that they provide a date and time stamp. 202.27.236.240 ( talk) 05:36, 20 December 2018 (UTC) Patrick Rossiter
This article states: "During 1981, all of the remaining RCAF CF-100s were withdrawn from service, having been succeeded by newer fighters such as the McDonnell Douglas CF-18 Hornet." This is a somewhat misleading statement. The CF-100 was withdrawn from frontline service as a fighter in 1963 when replaced by the CF-101B Voodoo. A small number did continue in secondary roles, such as ECM training, but to say the aircraft was directly succeeded as a fighter by aircraft such as the CF-18 is a bit of a stretch. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2601:801:4280:A710:0:0:0:9C4 ( talk) 22:04, 14 April 2022 (UTC)
This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
Avro Canada CF-100 Canuck article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
![]() | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Please stop adding the machine guns. The specifications are for Mk.5 which did not have this armament. Differences between variants should be delineated in the "Variants" section or on a separate "Variants" page if warranted by space.
From MoS Wikipedia:WikiProject Aircraft/page content
Note that these specifications should relate to a specific variant of the aircraft, and be labelled accordingly. Usually this will be the most famous/noteworthy/numerous one.
Thanks! - Emt147 Burninate! 19:22, 19 March 2006 (UTC)
I added this:
based on a book I've read on the CF-100. There's a diagram or picture of a Canuck fuselage with wide-chord swept wings, captioned CF-103. As far as I know, she never got off that paper. If anybody knows more, please include it!
Also, I've seen references to "Velvet Glove" missile trials. Am I right those were for Sparrow? Trekphiler 10:13 & 10:15, 20 October 2006 (UTC)
The CF-103 progressed to wooden mockup stage before being cancelled. The Velvet Glove was a Canadair project that was cancelled before it was to be considered as armament for the CF-105. The Velvet Glove test flight aircraft included the CF-100 and Canadair Sabre. I'll write more when I get a chance. Bzuk 11:42, 20 October 2006 (UTC)
A number of image files have been deleted recently that are posted on a few pages that I watch. This article and the CF-116 article are the ones that I remember. I don't know how to back-track deleted images to see why it was done, so I have no idea why they were deleted. After the fact, a user has removed the dead files from the infoboxes here and on CF-116, but didn't bother to attempt to replace the images. I don't know if this users had anything to do with the original images being deleted or not. That's all I know. - BillCJ 01:51, 21 January 2007 (UTC)
- BillCJ 01:51, 21 January 2007 (UTC)
I know no one is going to believe me, but I saw a Cluck from the window of the library at Laurentian University, obviously returning to CSFB North Bay. I entered U in 1985, and I believe I saw the aircraft the next year, but it could have been as late as 1989 when that library was closed. Either way, it was several years after they were ostensibly "gone" from North Bay in 1981. Maury 22:14, 8 March 2007 (UTC)
The comment(s) below were originally left at Talk:Avro Canada CF-100 Canuck/Comments, and are posted here for posterity. Following several discussions in past years, these subpages are now deprecated. The comments may be irrelevant or outdated; if so, please feel free to remove this section.
*needs references |
Substituted at 01:09, 22 May 2016 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 5 external links on Avro Canada CF-100 Canuck. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
{{
dead link}}
tag to
http://www.capa-acca.com/vintagelist/vintage_aircraft_list_4of4.htmWhen you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{
Sourcecheck}}
).
An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 16:26, 22 October 2016 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Avro Canada CF-100 Canuck. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{
Sourcecheck}}
).
An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 06:18, 11 November 2016 (UTC)
Do we need this section? I followed the link and the page has no mention of the CF-100 that I could find. If the a/c is alluded to somewhere in fiction or "the media", maybe the Aircraft in fiction page should be updated accordingly- BC talk to me
Note 1 simply shows "Rossiter 2002, p. 63" Can anyone tell me what reference is being made here? If anyone fixes the reference, could they please inform me at pat@hyperion.co.nz? Thank you. I am unable to understand how the four tildes provide a signature: reading the documentation appears to state that they provide a date and time stamp. 202.27.236.240 ( talk) 05:36, 20 December 2018 (UTC) Patrick Rossiter
This article states: "During 1981, all of the remaining RCAF CF-100s were withdrawn from service, having been succeeded by newer fighters such as the McDonnell Douglas CF-18 Hornet." This is a somewhat misleading statement. The CF-100 was withdrawn from frontline service as a fighter in 1963 when replaced by the CF-101B Voodoo. A small number did continue in secondary roles, such as ECM training, but to say the aircraft was directly succeeded as a fighter by aircraft such as the CF-18 is a bit of a stretch. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2601:801:4280:A710:0:0:0:9C4 ( talk) 22:04, 14 April 2022 (UTC)