![]() | This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
|
Should this article be deleted and Augmentation moved here for the edit history? Hyacinth 00:24, 5 Apr 2005 (UTC)
Hello Hyacinth. I see you reverted my removal of the reference to the Hendrix chord in this article. As I noted in my edit, I don't see how that is really relevant to this article. Since you are obviously a serious contributor I'll respect that by asking for an explanation of why you believe that it should be here. Can you please explain why you feel why this deserves special mention in this article? Thanks, -- DannyMuse ( talk) 13:30, 2 August 2011 (UTC)
This article is a complete disaster, how can it be improved? One particular problem is that there are far too many images for the text, and no examples of rhythmic augmentation among them (And what does the whole-tone scale have to do with augmentation?). — Mahlerlover1 ( converse) 03:00, 18 August 2011 (UTC)
Why and where is this article too technical? How should it be cleaned up? Hyacinth ( talk) 01:13, 27 April 2012 (UTC)
I guess we ( WP:MTH) never got around to filling out this section. While there is the dotted note, we could talk about its use as a compositional device here as well. Is this what was originally intended? — Devin.chaloux ( chat) 23:07, 29 July 2012 (UTC)
I've recently proofread and added a nice example of a canon with double augmentation at s:A Dictionary of Music and Musicians/Augmentation. Feel free to grab the score and add it here. Beeswaxcandle ( talk) 08:56, 7 June 2013 (UTC)
![]() | This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
|
Should this article be deleted and Augmentation moved here for the edit history? Hyacinth 00:24, 5 Apr 2005 (UTC)
Hello Hyacinth. I see you reverted my removal of the reference to the Hendrix chord in this article. As I noted in my edit, I don't see how that is really relevant to this article. Since you are obviously a serious contributor I'll respect that by asking for an explanation of why you believe that it should be here. Can you please explain why you feel why this deserves special mention in this article? Thanks, -- DannyMuse ( talk) 13:30, 2 August 2011 (UTC)
This article is a complete disaster, how can it be improved? One particular problem is that there are far too many images for the text, and no examples of rhythmic augmentation among them (And what does the whole-tone scale have to do with augmentation?). — Mahlerlover1 ( converse) 03:00, 18 August 2011 (UTC)
Why and where is this article too technical? How should it be cleaned up? Hyacinth ( talk) 01:13, 27 April 2012 (UTC)
I guess we ( WP:MTH) never got around to filling out this section. While there is the dotted note, we could talk about its use as a compositional device here as well. Is this what was originally intended? — Devin.chaloux ( chat) 23:07, 29 July 2012 (UTC)
I've recently proofread and added a nice example of a canon with double augmentation at s:A Dictionary of Music and Musicians/Augmentation. Feel free to grab the score and add it here. Beeswaxcandle ( talk) 08:56, 7 June 2013 (UTC)