![]() | This article is rated List-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
|
This page is intended as an authoritative data collection with citation of sources, that may be cited as a central reference by other articles (such as for the chemical elements). Femto 20:01, 18 Mar 2005 (UTC)
I have added the figures for metallic radii from Greenwood and Earnshaw. The values for Ge and Sn are missing from that text even though they are quoted elsewhere. I expect this is because the structures are considered (quite reasonably IMHO) by G&E to be too covalent. Lead is also missing, and I am not sure why, as G&E does not discuss the lead structure. We need a modern source for this as my feeling is that it should be included. Axiosaurus 09:13, 13 June 2007 (UTC)
Probably I find mistake. All measurements given in the table are in picometres (pm) of course. And not in mm as it said in article. Kemiisto ( talk) 20:46, 2 February 2009 (UTC)
The list doesn't sort correctly 60.231.182.124 ( talk) 01:16, 20 May 2015 (UTC)
Template:Atomic radii
Calculates the atomic volume by dividing the atomic mass by the density.
For example:
carbon = 12.011 neutron masses / (3510 kg/m^3) = 5.73 angstroms^3
(In other words 3510 kg/m^3 = 12.011 neutron masses/5.73 angstroms^3)
The resulting volume is multiplied by the
Template:Atomic packing factor for the corresponding crystal system.
![]() | Graphs are unavailable due to technical issues. There is more info on Phabricator and on MediaWiki.org. |
Just granpa ( talk) 18:04, 10 August 2017 (UTC)
The radius for hydrogen given uses notation inconsistent with the rest of the radii. And, by the way, what is the notation used for hydrogen? Jim Bowery ( talk) 14:57, 1 June 2018 (UTC)
For calculated values, R_H is currently greater than three period 2 elements (O, F and Ne). This is not consistent with other type of atomic radii.
-- Taweetham ( talk) 04:20, 24 July 2019 (UTC)
The Van der Waals and Covalent (single bond) radius for Pr and Nd are obviously incorrect, they currently are 10, 11 respectively for Pr and 20, 20 for Nd, they can't be found in the respective sources IgnacioPickering ( talk) 20:59, 24 September 2020 (UTC)
on what basis do we say that atomic radius of Ga is less than that of Al? Here the empirical and observed radius both contradicts this saying. Vanshita poddar ( talk) 09:05, 25 March 2021 (UTC) vanshita poddar
![]() | This article is rated List-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
|
This page is intended as an authoritative data collection with citation of sources, that may be cited as a central reference by other articles (such as for the chemical elements). Femto 20:01, 18 Mar 2005 (UTC)
I have added the figures for metallic radii from Greenwood and Earnshaw. The values for Ge and Sn are missing from that text even though they are quoted elsewhere. I expect this is because the structures are considered (quite reasonably IMHO) by G&E to be too covalent. Lead is also missing, and I am not sure why, as G&E does not discuss the lead structure. We need a modern source for this as my feeling is that it should be included. Axiosaurus 09:13, 13 June 2007 (UTC)
Probably I find mistake. All measurements given in the table are in picometres (pm) of course. And not in mm as it said in article. Kemiisto ( talk) 20:46, 2 February 2009 (UTC)
The list doesn't sort correctly 60.231.182.124 ( talk) 01:16, 20 May 2015 (UTC)
Template:Atomic radii
Calculates the atomic volume by dividing the atomic mass by the density.
For example:
carbon = 12.011 neutron masses / (3510 kg/m^3) = 5.73 angstroms^3
(In other words 3510 kg/m^3 = 12.011 neutron masses/5.73 angstroms^3)
The resulting volume is multiplied by the
Template:Atomic packing factor for the corresponding crystal system.
![]() | Graphs are unavailable due to technical issues. There is more info on Phabricator and on MediaWiki.org. |
Just granpa ( talk) 18:04, 10 August 2017 (UTC)
The radius for hydrogen given uses notation inconsistent with the rest of the radii. And, by the way, what is the notation used for hydrogen? Jim Bowery ( talk) 14:57, 1 June 2018 (UTC)
For calculated values, R_H is currently greater than three period 2 elements (O, F and Ne). This is not consistent with other type of atomic radii.
-- Taweetham ( talk) 04:20, 24 July 2019 (UTC)
The Van der Waals and Covalent (single bond) radius for Pr and Nd are obviously incorrect, they currently are 10, 11 respectively for Pr and 20, 20 for Nd, they can't be found in the respective sources IgnacioPickering ( talk) 20:59, 24 September 2020 (UTC)
on what basis do we say that atomic radius of Ga is less than that of Al? Here the empirical and observed radius both contradicts this saying. Vanshita poddar ( talk) 09:05, 25 March 2021 (UTC) vanshita poddar