Warning: active arbitration remedies The contentious topics procedure applies to this article. This article is related to the Arab–Israeli conflict, which is a contentious topic. Furthermore, the following rules apply when editing this article:
Editors who repeatedly or seriously fail to adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, any expected standards of behaviour, or any normal editorial process may be blocked or restricted by an administrator. Editors are advised to familiarise themselves with the contentious topics procedures before editing this page.
|
This article is much more about the annexation than it is about this village. There's a reason for wikilinks: they're so we don't have to repeat stuff in other articles on every single related page. nadav ( talk) 19:32, 25 May 2007 (UTC)
Right now the connection of A-Tur to East Jerusalem is unsourced. As such, I can not endorse the addition of the contentious East Jerusalem category. -- Abnn 18:58, 28 May 2007 (UTC)
In Arabic you write "Altur" and pronounce "A-Tur". So how come the name of this article is "At-Tur"? Eddau ( talk) 01:25, 1 February 2010 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on At-Tur (Mount of Olives). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
{{
dead link}}
tag to
http://www.jerusalemfoundation.org/english/article.php?id=320When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{
Sourcecheck}}
).
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 11:46, 20 October 2016 (UTC)
Part of the article says it is a majority muslim neighborhood while another part says it is majority Jewish now. Which is it? 138.162.128.52 ( talk) 20:04, 5 June 2019 (UTC)
I have restored sourced information about the incident not clear why it was removed.Anyhow I don't think its a right place for this incident at all.-- Shrike ( talk) 06:36, 27 March 2017 (UTC)
Warning: active arbitration remedies The contentious topics procedure applies to this article. This article is related to the Arab–Israeli conflict, which is a contentious topic. Furthermore, the following rules apply when editing this article:
Editors who repeatedly or seriously fail to adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, any expected standards of behaviour, or any normal editorial process may be blocked or restricted by an administrator. Editors are advised to familiarise themselves with the contentious topics procedures before editing this page.
|
This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
This article is much more about the annexation than it is about this village. There's a reason for wikilinks: they're so we don't have to repeat stuff in other articles on every single related page. nadav ( talk) 19:32, 25 May 2007 (UTC)
Right now the connection of A-Tur to East Jerusalem is unsourced. As such, I can not endorse the addition of the contentious East Jerusalem category. -- Abnn 18:58, 28 May 2007 (UTC)
In Arabic you write "Altur" and pronounce "A-Tur". So how come the name of this article is "At-Tur"? Eddau ( talk) 01:25, 1 February 2010 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on At-Tur (Mount of Olives). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
{{
dead link}}
tag to
http://www.jerusalemfoundation.org/english/article.php?id=320When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{
Sourcecheck}}
).
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 11:46, 20 October 2016 (UTC)
Part of the article says it is a majority muslim neighborhood while another part says it is majority Jewish now. Which is it? 138.162.128.52 ( talk) 20:04, 5 June 2019 (UTC)
I have restored sourced information about the incident not clear why it was removed.Anyhow I don't think its a right place for this incident at all.-- Shrike ( talk) 06:36, 27 March 2017 (UTC)