This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
STV Astrid article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
STV Astrid has been listed as one of the Engineering and technology good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. | |||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||
A fact from this article appeared on Wikipedia's
Main Page in the "
Did you know?" column on
August 9, 2013. | |||||||||||||
Current status: Good article |
This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||
|
Nominated at Template:Did you know nominations/Astrid (brig). Suggestions for better hooks would be very welcome! Thanks. Mike Peel ( talk) 20:39, 28 July 2013 (UTC)
"Where sources give measurements in Imperial units, these have been switched around to present them as metric units converted to Imperial."
Why? {{
convert}}
supports a |disp=flip
parameter that displays output value followed by input value: {{convert|100.9|ft|m|disp=flip}}
→ 30.8 metres (100.9 ft). This allows presentation as desired and eliminates the dual conversion.
— Trappist the monk ( talk) 10:55, 20 September 2013 (UTC)
GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Reviewer: ChrisGualtieri ( talk · contribs) 02:03, 4 January 2014 (UTC) I'll do this one. ChrisGualtieri ( talk) 02:03, 4 January 2014 (UTC)
Good Article Checklist
Good Article review progress box
|
Comments: This article has one major issue that jumps out. It uses past tense while the ship is still in existence, meaning that all the tenses need to be switched until it is actually destroyed. Quite often some of these ships are restored after being condemned to the yards, and if it hasn't happened yet, it might not happen at all.
All in all, its short and could use some additional details and coverage given that the vessel has been around for 90 years. It is just a borderline GA with the fixes right now, so please put some more content into it. I'll place this on hold. ChrisGualtieri ( talk) 15:15, 5 January 2014 (UTC)
The Peer Review from 15 September has been archived, so these are just a couple of passing suggestions if anyone has the sources:
Just some passing opinions, and nothing that detracts from this as a good article. Euryalus ( talk) 12:01, 2 October 2014 (UTC)
The MCIB have published their report into the loss of Astrid. Mjroots ( talk) 17:02, 18 February 2015 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on STV Astrid. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 09:54, 5 May 2017 (UTC)
This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
STV Astrid article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
STV Astrid has been listed as one of the Engineering and technology good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. | |||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||
A fact from this article appeared on Wikipedia's
Main Page in the "
Did you know?" column on
August 9, 2013. | |||||||||||||
Current status: Good article |
This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||
|
Nominated at Template:Did you know nominations/Astrid (brig). Suggestions for better hooks would be very welcome! Thanks. Mike Peel ( talk) 20:39, 28 July 2013 (UTC)
"Where sources give measurements in Imperial units, these have been switched around to present them as metric units converted to Imperial."
Why? {{
convert}}
supports a |disp=flip
parameter that displays output value followed by input value: {{convert|100.9|ft|m|disp=flip}}
→ 30.8 metres (100.9 ft). This allows presentation as desired and eliminates the dual conversion.
— Trappist the monk ( talk) 10:55, 20 September 2013 (UTC)
GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Reviewer: ChrisGualtieri ( talk · contribs) 02:03, 4 January 2014 (UTC) I'll do this one. ChrisGualtieri ( talk) 02:03, 4 January 2014 (UTC)
Good Article Checklist
Good Article review progress box
|
Comments: This article has one major issue that jumps out. It uses past tense while the ship is still in existence, meaning that all the tenses need to be switched until it is actually destroyed. Quite often some of these ships are restored after being condemned to the yards, and if it hasn't happened yet, it might not happen at all.
All in all, its short and could use some additional details and coverage given that the vessel has been around for 90 years. It is just a borderline GA with the fixes right now, so please put some more content into it. I'll place this on hold. ChrisGualtieri ( talk) 15:15, 5 January 2014 (UTC)
The Peer Review from 15 September has been archived, so these are just a couple of passing suggestions if anyone has the sources:
Just some passing opinions, and nothing that detracts from this as a good article. Euryalus ( talk) 12:01, 2 October 2014 (UTC)
The MCIB have published their report into the loss of Astrid. Mjroots ( talk) 17:02, 18 February 2015 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on STV Astrid. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 09:54, 5 May 2017 (UTC)