From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Consider to remove the "sources" in the first paragraph: They provide no "proof" of effectiveness (e.g. ArpON is listed in a "see also" section of a paper) or they cannot be verified (e.g. links to Google books, where the preview has been removed). Overall the "source" are hardly relevant to the page. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 194.94.76.243 ( talk) 22:21, 5 October 2019 (UTC) reply

Reads like an ad

This reads like an advertisement for ArpON, not an encyclopedia article.-- Masque ( talk) 23:04, 1 February 2021 (UTC) reply

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Consider to remove the "sources" in the first paragraph: They provide no "proof" of effectiveness (e.g. ArpON is listed in a "see also" section of a paper) or they cannot be verified (e.g. links to Google books, where the preview has been removed). Overall the "source" are hardly relevant to the page. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 194.94.76.243 ( talk) 22:21, 5 October 2019 (UTC) reply

Reads like an ad

This reads like an advertisement for ArpON, not an encyclopedia article.-- Masque ( talk) 23:04, 1 February 2021 (UTC) reply


Videos

Youtube | Vimeo | Bing

Websites

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Encyclopedia

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Facebook