![]() | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
An empty white box is a poor illustration of a white flag. Lumos3 10:32, 18 December 2005 (UTC)
The term Cessation of Hostilities Agreement seems to be rather common in the context of a number of recent conflicts in Africa and Asia. I'm wondering does the concept need it's own article, or should it be incorporated into this one? Mostlyharmless 23:30, 24 September 2007 (UTC)
I'm not sure, because the NYTimes never specifically states that this is a peace treaty, but does this information affect the blurb about North and South Korea?: http://www.nytimes.com/2007/10/04/world/asia/04korea.html?th&emc=th
If it does, that content should be changed to "armistice which occured in 1953, but did not end in a peace treaty until 2007." 99.245.226.106 13:18, 4 October 2007 (UTC)
Is Armistice about the same as Ceasefire? Please something about it in the article. TIA.-- Hhielscher ( talk) 20:44, 18 December 2007 (UTC)
The surrender (military) article states that a surrender between nations is achieved by the signing of an armistice. The armistice article states that a key aspect of armistice is that "all fighting ends with no one surrendering." Both lack any citations. Obviously one of these statements is wrong. ialsoagree ( talk) 18:11, 24 April 2010 (UTC)
What's the metric for determining which armistices are important enough to be included in the "Important armistices in history" section? I can kind of see how the 1918 armistice was a biggie, but why is the Korean one more important than, say, the Peace of Westphalia? Who decided that? Kafziel Complaint Department: Please take a number 00:40, 27 November 2012 (UTC)
Did this guy basically plagiarize the entire contents of this article for his 2011 book, or is there an older version of his book that somebody stole for this article? Kafziel Complaint Department: Please take a number 16:49, 27 November 2012 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on Armistice. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{
Sourcecheck}}
).
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 06:58, 18 October 2016 (UTC)
he article is great! But wonderng if warring groups hose say of conflicting religious views can also sign a armistice? believe this was done(for awhile) inFrance between warring,Catholics and Protests(Heugonauts?) Thanks Eddson storms ( talk) 06:13, 17 January 2017 (UTC)
Armistice Day ought to have commemorated the day in 1916 when the German Kaiser made the most generous peace offer in history. He stated that the various armies should take their soldiers back behind their pre-war borders, and that Germany did not want compensation.
If that offer had been accepted then the 'Russian' Revolution, WW2 and numerous other wars would not have occurred. Instead, Zionists convinced the British government to continue the War for their own purpose. They would involve America in the war in return for Britain seizing Palestine from the Turks and giving it to them. How many millions of Germans were killed during the years that followed that decision? Did their survivors receive any compensation? They were the last to enter WW1 but blamed for starting the war, by liars. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 1.144.104.149 ( talk) 20:24, 10 November 2017 (UTC)
![]() | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
An empty white box is a poor illustration of a white flag. Lumos3 10:32, 18 December 2005 (UTC)
The term Cessation of Hostilities Agreement seems to be rather common in the context of a number of recent conflicts in Africa and Asia. I'm wondering does the concept need it's own article, or should it be incorporated into this one? Mostlyharmless 23:30, 24 September 2007 (UTC)
I'm not sure, because the NYTimes never specifically states that this is a peace treaty, but does this information affect the blurb about North and South Korea?: http://www.nytimes.com/2007/10/04/world/asia/04korea.html?th&emc=th
If it does, that content should be changed to "armistice which occured in 1953, but did not end in a peace treaty until 2007." 99.245.226.106 13:18, 4 October 2007 (UTC)
Is Armistice about the same as Ceasefire? Please something about it in the article. TIA.-- Hhielscher ( talk) 20:44, 18 December 2007 (UTC)
The surrender (military) article states that a surrender between nations is achieved by the signing of an armistice. The armistice article states that a key aspect of armistice is that "all fighting ends with no one surrendering." Both lack any citations. Obviously one of these statements is wrong. ialsoagree ( talk) 18:11, 24 April 2010 (UTC)
What's the metric for determining which armistices are important enough to be included in the "Important armistices in history" section? I can kind of see how the 1918 armistice was a biggie, but why is the Korean one more important than, say, the Peace of Westphalia? Who decided that? Kafziel Complaint Department: Please take a number 00:40, 27 November 2012 (UTC)
Did this guy basically plagiarize the entire contents of this article for his 2011 book, or is there an older version of his book that somebody stole for this article? Kafziel Complaint Department: Please take a number 16:49, 27 November 2012 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on Armistice. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{
Sourcecheck}}
).
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 06:58, 18 October 2016 (UTC)
he article is great! But wonderng if warring groups hose say of conflicting religious views can also sign a armistice? believe this was done(for awhile) inFrance between warring,Catholics and Protests(Heugonauts?) Thanks Eddson storms ( talk) 06:13, 17 January 2017 (UTC)
Armistice Day ought to have commemorated the day in 1916 when the German Kaiser made the most generous peace offer in history. He stated that the various armies should take their soldiers back behind their pre-war borders, and that Germany did not want compensation.
If that offer had been accepted then the 'Russian' Revolution, WW2 and numerous other wars would not have occurred. Instead, Zionists convinced the British government to continue the War for their own purpose. They would involve America in the war in return for Britain seizing Palestine from the Turks and giving it to them. How many millions of Germans were killed during the years that followed that decision? Did their survivors receive any compensation? They were the last to enter WW1 but blamed for starting the war, by liars. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 1.144.104.149 ( talk) 20:24, 10 November 2017 (UTC)