This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Ukraine This article is within the scope of WikiProject Ukraine, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Ukraine on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.UkraineWikipedia:WikiProject UkraineTemplate:WikiProject UkraineUkraine articles ??? This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Tip: Anchors are case-sensitive in most browsers. This article links to one or more target anchors that no longer exist. [[Crimea#Administrative divisions|Region]] Please help fix the broken anchors. You can remove this template after fixing the problems. | Reporting errors

This page seems to have a pro-Ukrainian bias, I think it is better to reword the phrasing to make it more neutral. Nar 2608 ( talk) 13:23, 1 February 2023 (UTC) reply

What is biased about it?  — Michael  Z. 00:36, 3 February 2023 (UTC) reply

The use of strong terms in the introduction such "illegal occupation" was what made me make this comment: for the example I gave before, simply saying "occupation" would be enough and then the term could be linked to an article discussing the occupation in a more detailed manner rather than simply stating "oh it's illegal" Nar 2608 ( talk) 14:11, 13 March 2023 (UTC) reply

Stating the fact is not “strong” or “biased.” It is neutral.  — Michael  Z. 20:59, 13 March 2023 (UTC) reply

Exactly. Stating a fact regognised by International Law is not "biased" even though in Russian mindset facts are often lies and war is peace. -- Smörre ( talk) 11:45, 12 June 2023 (UTC) reply

@ No,see you at school, please respect WP:BRD and don’t edit-war. [1]  — Michael  Z. 03:32, 11 August 2023 (UTC) reply