![]() | This article was nominated for deletion on 30 November 2008. The result of the discussion was speedy keep. |
![]() | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Arebica or arabica was a variant of the Arabic alphabet:
So, it looks like that Croats, Serbs and Montenegrins weren't struck by islamization during Ottoman rule? Come on. All these nations suffered (partial) islamization waves. Literate ones (among them) used Arabic letters. Also, what about Herzegovina Muslims, and Muslims outside Bosnia and Herzegovina (Turkish Croatia, Semberija, Posavina, Polimlje). Are they excluded? Also, important is to note that islamization struck areas outside todays country Republic of Bosnia and Herzegovina.
Interesting. But we need references for this claim.
Serbo-croatian language doesn't exist, it existed as political Frankenstein. If you think on Kingdom of Yugoslavia, that country had serbo-croato-slovenian as official, if I remember well.
Interesting. But - citation needed. Kubura ( talk) 20:43, 23 March 2008 (UTC)
I noticed a contradiction: ي is used to write /i/ in the sample, but in the table it's listed as /j/. — kwami ( talk) 23:04, 3 December 2010 (UTC)
The text sample at the bottom is written by someone not knowing an inch of ´Arabic writing. Correct form see External links "Haveji".
I tried to mend it.
Nuremberg - Angel.García 131.188.3.21 ( talk) 15:09, 26 October 2012 (UTC)
I replaced the old table with a new one to show contextual forms. If someone with more knowledge of both Bosnian and Arebica could go through it to make sure it's all correct that would be great. I'm especially concerned about اٖى and ە.
My assumption is that the names Arebica and Bosnian are indeed correct and that the wrong letters have been used to type out the text examples, can anyone please confirm or deny this? -- CeNobiteElf ( talk) 22:23, 13 June 2015 (UTC)
There also seems to be contradictions regarding the letter for "a": text examples seem to be using ا, the chart is using آ, and the "Epohe fonetske misli kod Arapa i arebica" book (as well as the previous transliteration of "Arebica" in the lead section before I edited it) used ع to represent "a". I second with the above in asking if anyone can confirm which are the correct ones.
Pixelranium (
talk)
07:10, 30 December 2022 (UTC)
The sentence "Before World War I there were unsuccessful efforts by Bosnian Muslims of the Kingdom of Yugoslavia to adopt Arebica as the third official alphabet for Yugoslavian alongside Latin and Cyrillic." made no sense, since
This either happened in Austria-Hungary before WW1 or in the Kingdom of Yugoslavia before WW2. It makes more sense that it'd be later since Bosnia was only annexed to A-H in 1908, and since Bosnian Muslims had more relative political power in KoY. Removed references to the non-existent language and to the time period since KoY already dates it, added citation needed template. The article is badly in need of attention from someone who knows more about the subject. – Miranche T C 03:14, 8 May 2023 (UTC)
![]() | This article was nominated for deletion on 30 November 2008. The result of the discussion was speedy keep. |
![]() | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Arebica or arabica was a variant of the Arabic alphabet:
So, it looks like that Croats, Serbs and Montenegrins weren't struck by islamization during Ottoman rule? Come on. All these nations suffered (partial) islamization waves. Literate ones (among them) used Arabic letters. Also, what about Herzegovina Muslims, and Muslims outside Bosnia and Herzegovina (Turkish Croatia, Semberija, Posavina, Polimlje). Are they excluded? Also, important is to note that islamization struck areas outside todays country Republic of Bosnia and Herzegovina.
Interesting. But we need references for this claim.
Serbo-croatian language doesn't exist, it existed as political Frankenstein. If you think on Kingdom of Yugoslavia, that country had serbo-croato-slovenian as official, if I remember well.
Interesting. But - citation needed. Kubura ( talk) 20:43, 23 March 2008 (UTC)
I noticed a contradiction: ي is used to write /i/ in the sample, but in the table it's listed as /j/. — kwami ( talk) 23:04, 3 December 2010 (UTC)
The text sample at the bottom is written by someone not knowing an inch of ´Arabic writing. Correct form see External links "Haveji".
I tried to mend it.
Nuremberg - Angel.García 131.188.3.21 ( talk) 15:09, 26 October 2012 (UTC)
I replaced the old table with a new one to show contextual forms. If someone with more knowledge of both Bosnian and Arebica could go through it to make sure it's all correct that would be great. I'm especially concerned about اٖى and ە.
My assumption is that the names Arebica and Bosnian are indeed correct and that the wrong letters have been used to type out the text examples, can anyone please confirm or deny this? -- CeNobiteElf ( talk) 22:23, 13 June 2015 (UTC)
There also seems to be contradictions regarding the letter for "a": text examples seem to be using ا, the chart is using آ, and the "Epohe fonetske misli kod Arapa i arebica" book (as well as the previous transliteration of "Arebica" in the lead section before I edited it) used ع to represent "a". I second with the above in asking if anyone can confirm which are the correct ones.
Pixelranium (
talk)
07:10, 30 December 2022 (UTC)
The sentence "Before World War I there were unsuccessful efforts by Bosnian Muslims of the Kingdom of Yugoslavia to adopt Arebica as the third official alphabet for Yugoslavian alongside Latin and Cyrillic." made no sense, since
This either happened in Austria-Hungary before WW1 or in the Kingdom of Yugoslavia before WW2. It makes more sense that it'd be later since Bosnia was only annexed to A-H in 1908, and since Bosnian Muslims had more relative political power in KoY. Removed references to the non-existent language and to the time period since KoY already dates it, added citation needed template. The article is badly in need of attention from someone who knows more about the subject. – Miranche T C 03:14, 8 May 2023 (UTC)