This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
Apracharajas article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||
|
Is this what wikipedia has come to? Making up fake articles? Reading through this i have never heard of this "Apraca empire" or that they were Schytians. The name afghan doesn't come from this Apraca either, it has connections to the Avaskha and the Sassanian word "Abgan" but not this. This article is just really bad, it has no citations at all and seems to be someone's own POV and work of mind connected to possible nationalism. I did some aditional research but could not find nothing on this empire, if it is ok, can we try to nominate this for deletion? Akmal94 ( talk) 20:17, 4 May 2016 (UTC)
@ पाटलिपुत्र, I suppose that you object to any effort at merging back Aspavarma and others into an improved and comprehensive page on Apracharajas? If not, I will be spending the next few days to rewrite Apracharajas in an approach similar to the one adopted at Paratarajas. TrangaBellam ( talk) 17:11, 16 May 2022 (UTC)
Can someone explain to me how the Bajaur reliquary inscription's 73 years from 48/7 BC makes it 15 and not 25 AD? And how the Bajaur casket's 63rd year of Azes I from 48/7 BC makes it 5/6 and not 15/16 AD? Cornelius ( talk) 01:13, 18 April 2023 (UTC)
Start. TrangaBellam ( talk) 14:01, 6 March 2024 (UTC)
This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
Apracharajas article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||
|
Is this what wikipedia has come to? Making up fake articles? Reading through this i have never heard of this "Apraca empire" or that they were Schytians. The name afghan doesn't come from this Apraca either, it has connections to the Avaskha and the Sassanian word "Abgan" but not this. This article is just really bad, it has no citations at all and seems to be someone's own POV and work of mind connected to possible nationalism. I did some aditional research but could not find nothing on this empire, if it is ok, can we try to nominate this for deletion? Akmal94 ( talk) 20:17, 4 May 2016 (UTC)
@ पाटलिपुत्र, I suppose that you object to any effort at merging back Aspavarma and others into an improved and comprehensive page on Apracharajas? If not, I will be spending the next few days to rewrite Apracharajas in an approach similar to the one adopted at Paratarajas. TrangaBellam ( talk) 17:11, 16 May 2022 (UTC)
Can someone explain to me how the Bajaur reliquary inscription's 73 years from 48/7 BC makes it 15 and not 25 AD? And how the Bajaur casket's 63rd year of Azes I from 48/7 BC makes it 5/6 and not 15/16 AD? Cornelius ( talk) 01:13, 18 April 2023 (UTC)
Start. TrangaBellam ( talk) 14:01, 6 March 2024 (UTC)