This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
![]() | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Removed the majority of recent edits by [Special:Contributions/212.76.37.180|212.76.37.180] as this was a complete word-to-word copy of this recent article (entitled Of questionable intelligence) from The Economist (27 Feb 2007 edition). Deuar 12:01, 2 March 2007 (UTC)
[1].
I couldn't review all the book, but the chapter about Poland is certainly not RS. It is mixing all kind of extremists without rational discussion of agenda of different groups. I strongly dislike this guy, nevertheless, I have never encountered any Anti-Semitic statement of him. I would be very surprised.
Eon 15:01, 30 October 2007 (UTC)
This is just a personal opinion. Until you do not have any WP:RS critical reviews of this book published by major publishing house ( Routledge), your personal opinion about this book frankly does not matter at all. Cheers. M0RD00R ( talk) 09:58, 4 July 2008 (UTC)
To put it other way, you still do not have any RS to prove your point. Anyway, please refrain from incivil edit summaries like this one [3] in future content disputes. M0RD00R ( talk) 13:28, 12 July 2008 (UTC)
You did it again [4]. It is the last warning. M0RD00R ( talk) 13:33, 12 July 2008 (UTC)
To label a whole section as "False claims" just because a politician is criticized is hardly neutral and to declare the reports of international newspapers as "conspiracy theories" is such a blatant example of political propaganda, it just leaves me speechless. The criticism is based on reliable sources and needs to be mentioned.
{{
cite book}}
: Cite has empty unknown parameters: |chapterurl=
and |coauthors=
(
help)
80.136.67.21 ( talk) 17:17, 18 November 2015 (UTC)
Lol, looks like User:ReliableBen has decided the matter for himself. It's a false claim to him, therefore, it's a false claim. Lol.
I'd like to point out that this man, Antoni, is a Christian Nationalist, which is well-known for it's anti-Semitism, after the views of Martin Luther. Many modern KKK are Christian Nationalists, and are denounced as not being "true Christians" by most Christians, for their hatred. The Christian National Union that he adheres to is a part of the Christian right and social conservatives – making it more likely that they really are anti-Semetic. Plus, the label "nationalism" often comes with the disdain for "others". And, one of the sources is the Jerusalem Post – a very reliable source. Sounds like Reliable Ben is unreliable. Knowledge Battle 19:40, 18 November 2015 (UTC)
The following Wikimedia Commons files used on this page or its Wikidata item have been nominated for deletion:
Participate in the deletion discussions at the nomination pages linked above. — Community Tech bot ( talk) 05:36, 29 March 2020 (UTC)
The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:
Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. — Community Tech bot ( talk) 10:24, 13 April 2020 (UTC)
This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
![]() | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Removed the majority of recent edits by [Special:Contributions/212.76.37.180|212.76.37.180] as this was a complete word-to-word copy of this recent article (entitled Of questionable intelligence) from The Economist (27 Feb 2007 edition). Deuar 12:01, 2 March 2007 (UTC)
[1].
I couldn't review all the book, but the chapter about Poland is certainly not RS. It is mixing all kind of extremists without rational discussion of agenda of different groups. I strongly dislike this guy, nevertheless, I have never encountered any Anti-Semitic statement of him. I would be very surprised.
Eon 15:01, 30 October 2007 (UTC)
This is just a personal opinion. Until you do not have any WP:RS critical reviews of this book published by major publishing house ( Routledge), your personal opinion about this book frankly does not matter at all. Cheers. M0RD00R ( talk) 09:58, 4 July 2008 (UTC)
To put it other way, you still do not have any RS to prove your point. Anyway, please refrain from incivil edit summaries like this one [3] in future content disputes. M0RD00R ( talk) 13:28, 12 July 2008 (UTC)
You did it again [4]. It is the last warning. M0RD00R ( talk) 13:33, 12 July 2008 (UTC)
To label a whole section as "False claims" just because a politician is criticized is hardly neutral and to declare the reports of international newspapers as "conspiracy theories" is such a blatant example of political propaganda, it just leaves me speechless. The criticism is based on reliable sources and needs to be mentioned.
{{
cite book}}
: Cite has empty unknown parameters: |chapterurl=
and |coauthors=
(
help)
80.136.67.21 ( talk) 17:17, 18 November 2015 (UTC)
Lol, looks like User:ReliableBen has decided the matter for himself. It's a false claim to him, therefore, it's a false claim. Lol.
I'd like to point out that this man, Antoni, is a Christian Nationalist, which is well-known for it's anti-Semitism, after the views of Martin Luther. Many modern KKK are Christian Nationalists, and are denounced as not being "true Christians" by most Christians, for their hatred. The Christian National Union that he adheres to is a part of the Christian right and social conservatives – making it more likely that they really are anti-Semetic. Plus, the label "nationalism" often comes with the disdain for "others". And, one of the sources is the Jerusalem Post – a very reliable source. Sounds like Reliable Ben is unreliable. Knowledge Battle 19:40, 18 November 2015 (UTC)
The following Wikimedia Commons files used on this page or its Wikidata item have been nominated for deletion:
Participate in the deletion discussions at the nomination pages linked above. — Community Tech bot ( talk) 05:36, 29 March 2020 (UTC)
The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:
Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. — Community Tech bot ( talk) 10:24, 13 April 2020 (UTC)