![]() | Antonín Vězda has been listed as one of the
Natural sciences good articles under the
good article criteria. If you can improve it further,
please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can
reassess it. Review: January 21, 2021. ( Reviewed version). |
![]() | This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Reviewer: J Milburn ( talk · contribs) 13:09, 17 January 2021 (UTC)
More lichenology! What a treat. I managed to get
an article about a mycologist to FA status, but I sincerely doubt we have any good or featured articles about lichenologists.
Josh Milburn (
talk)
13:09, 17 January 2021 (UTC)
Sourcing looks very good, and no worries with the images. Nice article! Josh Milburn ( talk) 13:54, 17 January 2021 (UTC)
Happy to promote. Great work. Josh Milburn ( talk) 19:24, 21 January 2021 (UTC)
![]() | Antonín Vězda has been listed as one of the
Natural sciences good articles under the
good article criteria. If you can improve it further,
please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can
reassess it. Review: January 21, 2021. ( Reviewed version). |
![]() | This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Reviewer: J Milburn ( talk · contribs) 13:09, 17 January 2021 (UTC)
More lichenology! What a treat. I managed to get
an article about a mycologist to FA status, but I sincerely doubt we have any good or featured articles about lichenologists.
Josh Milburn (
talk)
13:09, 17 January 2021 (UTC)
Sourcing looks very good, and no worries with the images. Nice article! Josh Milburn ( talk) 13:54, 17 January 2021 (UTC)
Happy to promote. Great work. Josh Milburn ( talk) 19:24, 21 January 2021 (UTC)