![]() | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
|
[1] Any ideas or places to post this photo? -- which is PD. TIA, Pete Tillman ( talk) 20:36, 7 July 2008 (UTC)
The example on how to profit from used cars is ridiculous and doesnt belong in an encyclopedia. It should be removed immediately despite its tag as a possible opinion. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.240.33.101 ( talk) 06:48, 3 February 2009 (UTC)
This entire posting on antique cars is so much BS it is impossible to comment on all of it. It should be removed. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 98.195.83.242 ( talk) 16:22, 16 May 2009 (UTC)
This article has been tagged with no references since August 2008. The title is good but the article is not and at this point is wholly WP:OR. In my opinion it has been a candidate for nomination for AFD, WP:Speedy delete at worse, or Merge at the very least, for a long time. I looked at it to see if there was something I could do but it seems as if it was written (my personal OR) by a person that made a bad deal, on buying or restoring an old car, so would need a complete rewrite.
My dad told me that antiques are 100 years old or older, not 45. Classics can be aged from 20-99.
108.249.202.186 ( talk) 23:59, 5 March 2013 (UTC)
There is a single anon IP editor who keeps changing "In the United States, an antique car is generally defined as a car over 45 years of age, this being the definition used by the Antique Automobile Club of America" to 25 years. Does he have a valid point or is he just a persistent vandal? Stepho talk 23:46, 14 June 2014 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on Antique car. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{
Sourcecheck}}
).
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 18:00, 15 October 2016 (UTC)
![]() | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
|
[1] Any ideas or places to post this photo? -- which is PD. TIA, Pete Tillman ( talk) 20:36, 7 July 2008 (UTC)
The example on how to profit from used cars is ridiculous and doesnt belong in an encyclopedia. It should be removed immediately despite its tag as a possible opinion. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.240.33.101 ( talk) 06:48, 3 February 2009 (UTC)
This entire posting on antique cars is so much BS it is impossible to comment on all of it. It should be removed. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 98.195.83.242 ( talk) 16:22, 16 May 2009 (UTC)
This article has been tagged with no references since August 2008. The title is good but the article is not and at this point is wholly WP:OR. In my opinion it has been a candidate for nomination for AFD, WP:Speedy delete at worse, or Merge at the very least, for a long time. I looked at it to see if there was something I could do but it seems as if it was written (my personal OR) by a person that made a bad deal, on buying or restoring an old car, so would need a complete rewrite.
My dad told me that antiques are 100 years old or older, not 45. Classics can be aged from 20-99.
108.249.202.186 ( talk) 23:59, 5 March 2013 (UTC)
There is a single anon IP editor who keeps changing "In the United States, an antique car is generally defined as a car over 45 years of age, this being the definition used by the Antique Automobile Club of America" to 25 years. Does he have a valid point or is he just a persistent vandal? Stepho talk 23:46, 14 June 2014 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on Antique car. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{
Sourcecheck}}
).
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 18:00, 15 October 2016 (UTC)