This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
It was proposed in this section that
Annie Dookhan be
renamed and moved to
Massachusetts drug lab tampering case.
The discussion has been closed, and the result will be found in the closer's comment. Links:
current log •
target log |
The result of the move request was: No consensus, not moved ( non-admin closure) DavidLeighEllis ( talk) 00:58, 12 April 2014 (UTC)
Annie Dookhan → Massachusetts drug lab tampering case – According to our guideline on biographical notability, those notable for one event ( WP:ONEEVENT) probably don't merit a biographical article. Instead, this article should focus on the incident Dookhan was involved in, the details and the aftermath of the case, rather than the life of Dookhan herself. I think this is a potential WP:FA and I'd like to help get it there, but I don't think it can be an outstanding article if it's just a Dookhan biography. The real issues of this case are out of scope for a biography. I'm happy to support any other suggested title—this is one possibility. Designate ( talk) 02:37, 4 April 2014 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Annie Dookhan. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{
Sourcecheck}}
).
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 23:40, 14 October 2016 (UTC)
Massachusetts prosecutors are expected shortly to move to vacate the vast majority of the tainted convictions [1] — Tamfang ( talk) 07:45, 30 March 2017 (UTC)
'never saw her in front of a microscope'? she was a chemist.they perform tests using reagents, not microscopes. wth? Toyokuni3 ( talk) 03:10, 19 April 2017 (UTC)
She is the reason in cards today let alone the nod of publics observations Breanna Ackerman ( talk) 23:55, 7 July 2022 (UTC)
This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
It was proposed in this section that
Annie Dookhan be
renamed and moved to
Massachusetts drug lab tampering case.
The discussion has been closed, and the result will be found in the closer's comment. Links:
current log •
target log |
The result of the move request was: No consensus, not moved ( non-admin closure) DavidLeighEllis ( talk) 00:58, 12 April 2014 (UTC)
Annie Dookhan → Massachusetts drug lab tampering case – According to our guideline on biographical notability, those notable for one event ( WP:ONEEVENT) probably don't merit a biographical article. Instead, this article should focus on the incident Dookhan was involved in, the details and the aftermath of the case, rather than the life of Dookhan herself. I think this is a potential WP:FA and I'd like to help get it there, but I don't think it can be an outstanding article if it's just a Dookhan biography. The real issues of this case are out of scope for a biography. I'm happy to support any other suggested title—this is one possibility. Designate ( talk) 02:37, 4 April 2014 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Annie Dookhan. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{
Sourcecheck}}
).
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 23:40, 14 October 2016 (UTC)
Massachusetts prosecutors are expected shortly to move to vacate the vast majority of the tainted convictions [1] — Tamfang ( talk) 07:45, 30 March 2017 (UTC)
'never saw her in front of a microscope'? she was a chemist.they perform tests using reagents, not microscopes. wth? Toyokuni3 ( talk) 03:10, 19 April 2017 (UTC)
She is the reason in cards today let alone the nod of publics observations Breanna Ackerman ( talk) 23:55, 7 July 2022 (UTC)