From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Reception is not NPOV

The reception section says that her theories are well received and it backs this up with the New Oxford Review (a Catholic publication, not a social sciences organization), the Washington Times (a right wing newspaper) and the Discovery Institute (a creationism fringe group). I will research and fix this in the next couple weeks and may also add it to WP:FTN as her ideas are not normative (one could say they are deviant even) in the social sciences. Sædon talk 05:41, 23 August 2012 (UTC) reply

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Reception is not NPOV

The reception section says that her theories are well received and it backs this up with the New Oxford Review (a Catholic publication, not a social sciences organization), the Washington Times (a right wing newspaper) and the Discovery Institute (a creationism fringe group). I will research and fix this in the next couple weeks and may also add it to WP:FTN as her ideas are not normative (one could say they are deviant even) in the social sciences. Sædon talk 05:41, 23 August 2012 (UTC) reply


Videos

Youtube | Vimeo | Bing

Websites

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Encyclopedia

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Facebook