This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
![]() | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
So her surname is polish, yeah? Anglicised it would be pronounced something like pa-lAz-chook, where the z is like the s in measure. But no, she (and I assume her father) pronounce it palA-shay. WTF? How do you even get shay out of chook? Are queenslanders really that bad at reading and pronouncing 'foreign' name? This is the state that had to deal with Bjelkepetersen, Byel-key, surely a good aussie word like chook isn't beyond them. Anyway, does anyone know? 60.240.207.146 ( talk) 23:51, 20 January 2015 (UTC)
The "weird" pronunciation does not make sense. Either keep the original, Polish pronunciation, or anglicize it as much as you need to in order to make it easier to pronounce for English speakers. But "Palashay"? Please, where does it come from? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 203.128.232.103 ( talk) 01:06, 1 April 2015 (UTC)
She is Premier-elect until sworn in on 14 February. 203.9.185.136 ( talk) 06:55, 13 February 2015 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to one external link on
Annastacia Palaszczuk. Please take a moment to review
my edit. If necessary, add {{
cbignore}}
after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{
nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}}
to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— cyberbot II Talk to my owner:Online 13:47, 17 January 2016 (UTC)
This article seems to be getting repeatedly vandalised with biased political opinions relating to the February 2016 lockout laws. 1.132.96.117 ( talk) 09:04, 17 February 2016 (UTC)
Its no surprise the article is being repeatedly vandalised. Anastasia Palazczuk has promised but not delivered and some downright hate her. 🌌 ExoplanetaryNova ( talk) 23:15, 24 January 2022 (UTC)
Yet to be added is an approved summary of recent actions that are introducing increasingly stricter anti-protester laws. 110.175.82.149 ( talk) 10:21, 9 October 2019 (UTC)
Annastacia Palaszczuk is a Member of Parliament who was up for re-election in the 2020 State General Election. The article discusses this briefly in the opening and the 2020 election section.
She led Labor to further victories at the 2017 and 2020 elections, making her the first Australian female Premier to win three terms in Government.[3]
Editors should be mindful that results are not yet known for the majority of seats, with votes still being counted at the time of writing. No results were known when the above was written. Many news articles have been published speculating on the results.
The introduction references an article by The Guardian [1] written before the results for any electorate were known.
Annastacia Palaszczuk says she is confident Labor has won a clear majority in Queensland, and she becomes the first woman in the nation’s history to win three consecutive elections. [emphasis added]
— The Guardian, Queensland election: Annastacia Palaszczuk wins historic third term
The article does not support the assertion she won the election, despite the headline. Instead it discusses her speculation and personal confidence that the Australian Labor Party will win a clear majority
.
Only two seats have been declared as at 4 November 2020, both only declared today. One of these is Inala, Ms Palaszczuk’s electorate. Authoritative information is available from the Electoral Commission of Queensland, who are conducting the election.
When discussing a presently-underway election, editors should be especially mindful to use sources meeting the Verifiability guideline. News articles written before an outcome being discussed was known, should not be used to support assertions about which candidate won. ExoticViolet ( talk) 05:04, 4 November 2020 (UTC)
This may sometimes be true, as was the case for her seat of Inala, however the introduction makes implicit claims about the overall election results. There is a diversity of viewpoints on how substantial this might be and it is certainly still speculation, even if reasoned.Declaration of results in every electorate is not necessary when the overall outcome is clear
— User:Canley 05:38, 4 November 2020 (UTC)
[L]ead Labor to further victories at the... 2020 electionsis quite emotive language suggesting
[L]ead Labor to... victor[y]is not a neutral description of events; it might be considered puffery. It is certainly not of a dispassionate, encyclopaedic sytle. The claim that Labor will or has won a majority of seats, due to her efforts is likely to be a lot more contentious. The point of view is not universal and should not be presented in Wikipedia's voice. Only a single source is relied upon, which is unlikely to be compatible with presenting a balanced viewpoint. See WP:PUFFERY, WP:EPSTYLE, WP:ATTRIBUTEPOV, WP:BALANCE.
The electoral commission is not the only verifiable source of overall results, and knowledgable analysis and projection of the results by media outlets can be used to make a reasonable call on the winner.
— User:Canley 05:38, 4 November 2020 (UTC)
It would be silly for Wikipedia to say nothing about the outcome for three, four or six weeks after an election...
— User:Canley 05:38, 4 November 2020 (UTC)
The opposition leader has conceded defeat, which is pretty much unheard of if there is any chance whatsoever of victory.
— User:Canley 05:38, 4 November 2020 (UTC)
concedean election to another candidate, in Queensland.
Also, on many occasions, governors and governors-general have sworn in governments and cabinets based on clear outcomes before any, let alone most, seats have been officially declared based on reasoned analysis of provisional results.
— User:Canley 05:38, 4 November 2020 (UTC)
References
“Polish: Annastacia Pałaszczuk”, in Polish her name would of been Anastazja, not Annastacia. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2406:E003:A23:8801:84C1:2886:21F6:B2ED ( talk) 23:40, 27 December 2021 (UTC)
In the article, amicably is in Scare quotes here:
Palaszczuk and Drabsch split 'amicably' in February 2018.
Either Szcz and Bsch "split amicably in February 2018" if that's a direct quote from the reference or they split amicably in February 2018 if it's a paraphrase but the scare quotes around amicably do not benefit the reader. Maybe some contributor had an unknown axe to grind and used scare quotes, but this isn't the place for that.
I propose removing the apostrophes from the excerpt I quoted. 49.179.16.148 ( talk) 07:16, 3 December 2022 (UTC)
Should we add a reference perhaps in the lead, or personal life section about her nickname "Palachook'? This is in common use in Queensland and somewhat resembles the traditional pronunciation in her native Polish, as discussed in the topic above. 203.46.132.214 ( talk) 06:49, 8 August 2023 (UTC)
This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
![]() | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
So her surname is polish, yeah? Anglicised it would be pronounced something like pa-lAz-chook, where the z is like the s in measure. But no, she (and I assume her father) pronounce it palA-shay. WTF? How do you even get shay out of chook? Are queenslanders really that bad at reading and pronouncing 'foreign' name? This is the state that had to deal with Bjelkepetersen, Byel-key, surely a good aussie word like chook isn't beyond them. Anyway, does anyone know? 60.240.207.146 ( talk) 23:51, 20 January 2015 (UTC)
The "weird" pronunciation does not make sense. Either keep the original, Polish pronunciation, or anglicize it as much as you need to in order to make it easier to pronounce for English speakers. But "Palashay"? Please, where does it come from? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 203.128.232.103 ( talk) 01:06, 1 April 2015 (UTC)
She is Premier-elect until sworn in on 14 February. 203.9.185.136 ( talk) 06:55, 13 February 2015 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to one external link on
Annastacia Palaszczuk. Please take a moment to review
my edit. If necessary, add {{
cbignore}}
after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{
nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}}
to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— cyberbot II Talk to my owner:Online 13:47, 17 January 2016 (UTC)
This article seems to be getting repeatedly vandalised with biased political opinions relating to the February 2016 lockout laws. 1.132.96.117 ( talk) 09:04, 17 February 2016 (UTC)
Its no surprise the article is being repeatedly vandalised. Anastasia Palazczuk has promised but not delivered and some downright hate her. 🌌 ExoplanetaryNova ( talk) 23:15, 24 January 2022 (UTC)
Yet to be added is an approved summary of recent actions that are introducing increasingly stricter anti-protester laws. 110.175.82.149 ( talk) 10:21, 9 October 2019 (UTC)
Annastacia Palaszczuk is a Member of Parliament who was up for re-election in the 2020 State General Election. The article discusses this briefly in the opening and the 2020 election section.
She led Labor to further victories at the 2017 and 2020 elections, making her the first Australian female Premier to win three terms in Government.[3]
Editors should be mindful that results are not yet known for the majority of seats, with votes still being counted at the time of writing. No results were known when the above was written. Many news articles have been published speculating on the results.
The introduction references an article by The Guardian [1] written before the results for any electorate were known.
Annastacia Palaszczuk says she is confident Labor has won a clear majority in Queensland, and she becomes the first woman in the nation’s history to win three consecutive elections. [emphasis added]
— The Guardian, Queensland election: Annastacia Palaszczuk wins historic third term
The article does not support the assertion she won the election, despite the headline. Instead it discusses her speculation and personal confidence that the Australian Labor Party will win a clear majority
.
Only two seats have been declared as at 4 November 2020, both only declared today. One of these is Inala, Ms Palaszczuk’s electorate. Authoritative information is available from the Electoral Commission of Queensland, who are conducting the election.
When discussing a presently-underway election, editors should be especially mindful to use sources meeting the Verifiability guideline. News articles written before an outcome being discussed was known, should not be used to support assertions about which candidate won. ExoticViolet ( talk) 05:04, 4 November 2020 (UTC)
This may sometimes be true, as was the case for her seat of Inala, however the introduction makes implicit claims about the overall election results. There is a diversity of viewpoints on how substantial this might be and it is certainly still speculation, even if reasoned.Declaration of results in every electorate is not necessary when the overall outcome is clear
— User:Canley 05:38, 4 November 2020 (UTC)
[L]ead Labor to further victories at the... 2020 electionsis quite emotive language suggesting
[L]ead Labor to... victor[y]is not a neutral description of events; it might be considered puffery. It is certainly not of a dispassionate, encyclopaedic sytle. The claim that Labor will or has won a majority of seats, due to her efforts is likely to be a lot more contentious. The point of view is not universal and should not be presented in Wikipedia's voice. Only a single source is relied upon, which is unlikely to be compatible with presenting a balanced viewpoint. See WP:PUFFERY, WP:EPSTYLE, WP:ATTRIBUTEPOV, WP:BALANCE.
The electoral commission is not the only verifiable source of overall results, and knowledgable analysis and projection of the results by media outlets can be used to make a reasonable call on the winner.
— User:Canley 05:38, 4 November 2020 (UTC)
It would be silly for Wikipedia to say nothing about the outcome for three, four or six weeks after an election...
— User:Canley 05:38, 4 November 2020 (UTC)
The opposition leader has conceded defeat, which is pretty much unheard of if there is any chance whatsoever of victory.
— User:Canley 05:38, 4 November 2020 (UTC)
concedean election to another candidate, in Queensland.
Also, on many occasions, governors and governors-general have sworn in governments and cabinets based on clear outcomes before any, let alone most, seats have been officially declared based on reasoned analysis of provisional results.
— User:Canley 05:38, 4 November 2020 (UTC)
References
“Polish: Annastacia Pałaszczuk”, in Polish her name would of been Anastazja, not Annastacia. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2406:E003:A23:8801:84C1:2886:21F6:B2ED ( talk) 23:40, 27 December 2021 (UTC)
In the article, amicably is in Scare quotes here:
Palaszczuk and Drabsch split 'amicably' in February 2018.
Either Szcz and Bsch "split amicably in February 2018" if that's a direct quote from the reference or they split amicably in February 2018 if it's a paraphrase but the scare quotes around amicably do not benefit the reader. Maybe some contributor had an unknown axe to grind and used scare quotes, but this isn't the place for that.
I propose removing the apostrophes from the excerpt I quoted. 49.179.16.148 ( talk) 07:16, 3 December 2022 (UTC)
Should we add a reference perhaps in the lead, or personal life section about her nickname "Palachook'? This is in common use in Queensland and somewhat resembles the traditional pronunciation in her native Polish, as discussed in the topic above. 203.46.132.214 ( talk) 06:49, 8 August 2023 (UTC)