This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
Animal ethics article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
Archives: 1 |
![]() | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
![]() | This article was the subject of an educational assignment in 2013 Q1. Further details were available on the "Education Program:Ball State University/Introduction to Digital Literacies (2013 Q1)" page, which is now unavailable on the wiki. |
After my remove as been undo I opened this discussion. the wiki version contested : "Animal ethics is a branch of ethics which examines human-animal relationships, the moral consideration of animals and how nonhuman animals ought to be treated. The subject matter includes animal rights, animal welfare, animal law, speciesism, animal cognition, wildlife conservation, wild animal suffering,[1] the moral status of nonhuman animals, the concept of nonhuman personhood, human exceptionalism, the history of animal use, and theories of justice." The speciesism should be remove for neutrality and consistency."
Animal ethics is define as a branch of ethics. Speciesism is a branch of the Animal ethics. The definition of Animal ethics cannot be define by is existing and by the study of is branch. It is a vicious circle. Speciesism is a Ideology concept of the animal ethics. The beliefs about specisism is not the role of philosophers, but it's the role of ideologists. The wiki page of specisism say : "The term has several different definitions within the relevant literature." The specisim is not a fact like the other subject of the Animal ethics. But it'is a ideology including the concept of the animal ethics. Many philosopher reject the existence of this concept. Wiki define a ideology as : "An ideology is a set of beliefs or philosophies attributed to a person or group of persons, especially as held for reasons that are not purely epistemic,[1][2] in which "practical elements are as prominent as theoretical ones."[3] Formerly applied primarily to economic, political, or religious theories and policies". Include speciesism in this article make confusion between a philosopher and a ideologist. Definition : "An ideologist is someone who develops or supports a particular ideology."
Define a branch of the ethics as a study and a fallow a ideological concept is of a contradiction of the mean of what is the philosophy.
For exemple, if the wiki page of Livestok is define as a Speciesism concept, that is not a fact, it's a belief. That can be interpreted as a propaganda anti-speciesism and the wikipedia rule will not be respected. Same thing with the animal ethics. Stebulba ( talk) 05:34, 31 May 2022 (UTC)
Hello! Wonderful article, however the "Ethical Theories" section was flagged by wiki for being written in a persuasive style. Please consider restructuring the three theories in a more factual manner. -- Chocolate222moose ( talk) 15:28, 17 October 2022 (UTC)
I am quite surprised that intensive animal farming is currently not mentioned. Farmed animals are roughly 1000 times more numerous than animals in laboratories, and there are many commonplace practices that seem very painful, such as the mutilation of piglets. Alenoach ( talk) 23:18, 9 June 2024 (UTC)
This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
Animal ethics article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
Archives: 1 |
![]() | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
![]() | This article was the subject of an educational assignment in 2013 Q1. Further details were available on the "Education Program:Ball State University/Introduction to Digital Literacies (2013 Q1)" page, which is now unavailable on the wiki. |
After my remove as been undo I opened this discussion. the wiki version contested : "Animal ethics is a branch of ethics which examines human-animal relationships, the moral consideration of animals and how nonhuman animals ought to be treated. The subject matter includes animal rights, animal welfare, animal law, speciesism, animal cognition, wildlife conservation, wild animal suffering,[1] the moral status of nonhuman animals, the concept of nonhuman personhood, human exceptionalism, the history of animal use, and theories of justice." The speciesism should be remove for neutrality and consistency."
Animal ethics is define as a branch of ethics. Speciesism is a branch of the Animal ethics. The definition of Animal ethics cannot be define by is existing and by the study of is branch. It is a vicious circle. Speciesism is a Ideology concept of the animal ethics. The beliefs about specisism is not the role of philosophers, but it's the role of ideologists. The wiki page of specisism say : "The term has several different definitions within the relevant literature." The specisim is not a fact like the other subject of the Animal ethics. But it'is a ideology including the concept of the animal ethics. Many philosopher reject the existence of this concept. Wiki define a ideology as : "An ideology is a set of beliefs or philosophies attributed to a person or group of persons, especially as held for reasons that are not purely epistemic,[1][2] in which "practical elements are as prominent as theoretical ones."[3] Formerly applied primarily to economic, political, or religious theories and policies". Include speciesism in this article make confusion between a philosopher and a ideologist. Definition : "An ideologist is someone who develops or supports a particular ideology."
Define a branch of the ethics as a study and a fallow a ideological concept is of a contradiction of the mean of what is the philosophy.
For exemple, if the wiki page of Livestok is define as a Speciesism concept, that is not a fact, it's a belief. That can be interpreted as a propaganda anti-speciesism and the wikipedia rule will not be respected. Same thing with the animal ethics. Stebulba ( talk) 05:34, 31 May 2022 (UTC)
Hello! Wonderful article, however the "Ethical Theories" section was flagged by wiki for being written in a persuasive style. Please consider restructuring the three theories in a more factual manner. -- Chocolate222moose ( talk) 15:28, 17 October 2022 (UTC)
I am quite surprised that intensive animal farming is currently not mentioned. Farmed animals are roughly 1000 times more numerous than animals in laboratories, and there are many commonplace practices that seem very painful, such as the mutilation of piglets. Alenoach ( talk) 23:18, 9 June 2024 (UTC)