![]() | This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
![]() | The contents of the Cultural transmission in animals page were merged into Animal culture on 23 March 2019. For the contribution history and old versions of the redirected page, please see its history; for the discussion at that location, see its talk page. |
What about Bird Funerals or how ants farm fungus, and herd caterpillars as livestock? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 207.112.55.242 ( talk) 20:56, 29 January 2021 (UTC)
To keep your references from being listed more than once you need to put
<ref name="XXXX">
at first part of citation and put
<ref name="XXXX" />
after each citation after.
For example....
[1].
next citation would be:....
[1]. Aquadancer101 ( talk) 16:06, 21 April 2009 (UTC)
Is it ready to submit? —Preceding
unsigned comment added by
Tennsplyr (
talk •
contribs)
04:08, 23 April 2009 (UTC)
Just wanted to note: there is definitely no consensus about the role of "memes". To the contrary, very few anthropologists use the concept at all and it has been strongly critizised, for example for failing to provide any non-trivial insights about cultural evolution (evolutionary model in no way rely on the concept). — Preceding unsigned comment added by 129.16.11.179 ( talk) 14:21, 2 November 2011 (UTC)
En español se usan dos comillas → rojo. En cambio, en inglés se usa solo una → 'red'.-- Desirée H.S ( talk) 15:58, 3 February 2015 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Animal culture. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 06:43, 6 July 2017 (UTC)
Hello, this was removed as "unsuitably sourced". What sources are you looking for?
{{
cite journal}}
: Unknown parameter |month=
ignored (
help)
Samw ( talk) 17:27, 11 September 2018 (UTC)
Support the 2017 merge proposal from Cultural transmission in animals to Animal culture. The latter is the broader article, and already includes significant discussion of transmission. Hence, the duplication of scope would be avoided by merging the two together. The combined size, even without editing, is well under 100k, so the merged article would not be too large. Klbrain ( talk) 11:00, 4 January 2019 (UTC)
A lot is said about transmission of culture in raccoons (Procyon lotor Linnaeus 1758) in particular and other Carnivorans of both the cat and dog suborders . . . I don't have the book in front of me, but I know it is mentioned in Raccoons: A Natural History by Samuel I Zeveloff (Smithsonian, 2002) ISBN 978-1588340337 and the bibliography of that book is extensive. It looks like the folks who have worked on the article so far can do a better job more rapidly than myself of writing a paragraph with at least three scientific papers referenced, which I think is a very good benchmark.
The Sydney Morning Herald, Australian Broadcasting Corporation, The Age, and other media in the region have stories at least once a year of wallabies and other macropods who are zeroing in on the high-morphine poppy crop in Tasmania, jumping the fences, eating poppy heads and hopping in circles and wrestling with each other all night and farmers often find narcotised animals in the fields -- in my humble opinion, that is at a higher level than stimulus-response . . . S3819 ( talk) 00:18, 21 August 2019 (UTC)
Two references in the article list many more than six authors, which is an eyesore and unusual. Does anyone support or object to their reduction with et al? Rebecca Beecham Gotzl ( talk) 15:18, 21 February 2023 (UTC)
![]() | This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
![]() | The contents of the Cultural transmission in animals page were merged into Animal culture on 23 March 2019. For the contribution history and old versions of the redirected page, please see its history; for the discussion at that location, see its talk page. |
What about Bird Funerals or how ants farm fungus, and herd caterpillars as livestock? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 207.112.55.242 ( talk) 20:56, 29 January 2021 (UTC)
To keep your references from being listed more than once you need to put
<ref name="XXXX">
at first part of citation and put
<ref name="XXXX" />
after each citation after.
For example....
[1].
next citation would be:....
[1]. Aquadancer101 ( talk) 16:06, 21 April 2009 (UTC)
Is it ready to submit? —Preceding
unsigned comment added by
Tennsplyr (
talk •
contribs)
04:08, 23 April 2009 (UTC)
Just wanted to note: there is definitely no consensus about the role of "memes". To the contrary, very few anthropologists use the concept at all and it has been strongly critizised, for example for failing to provide any non-trivial insights about cultural evolution (evolutionary model in no way rely on the concept). — Preceding unsigned comment added by 129.16.11.179 ( talk) 14:21, 2 November 2011 (UTC)
En español se usan dos comillas → rojo. En cambio, en inglés se usa solo una → 'red'.-- Desirée H.S ( talk) 15:58, 3 February 2015 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Animal culture. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 06:43, 6 July 2017 (UTC)
Hello, this was removed as "unsuitably sourced". What sources are you looking for?
{{
cite journal}}
: Unknown parameter |month=
ignored (
help)
Samw ( talk) 17:27, 11 September 2018 (UTC)
Support the 2017 merge proposal from Cultural transmission in animals to Animal culture. The latter is the broader article, and already includes significant discussion of transmission. Hence, the duplication of scope would be avoided by merging the two together. The combined size, even without editing, is well under 100k, so the merged article would not be too large. Klbrain ( talk) 11:00, 4 January 2019 (UTC)
A lot is said about transmission of culture in raccoons (Procyon lotor Linnaeus 1758) in particular and other Carnivorans of both the cat and dog suborders . . . I don't have the book in front of me, but I know it is mentioned in Raccoons: A Natural History by Samuel I Zeveloff (Smithsonian, 2002) ISBN 978-1588340337 and the bibliography of that book is extensive. It looks like the folks who have worked on the article so far can do a better job more rapidly than myself of writing a paragraph with at least three scientific papers referenced, which I think is a very good benchmark.
The Sydney Morning Herald, Australian Broadcasting Corporation, The Age, and other media in the region have stories at least once a year of wallabies and other macropods who are zeroing in on the high-morphine poppy crop in Tasmania, jumping the fences, eating poppy heads and hopping in circles and wrestling with each other all night and farmers often find narcotised animals in the fields -- in my humble opinion, that is at a higher level than stimulus-response . . . S3819 ( talk) 00:18, 21 August 2019 (UTC)
Two references in the article list many more than six authors, which is an eyesore and unusual. Does anyone support or object to their reduction with et al? Rebecca Beecham Gotzl ( talk) 15:18, 21 February 2023 (UTC)