![]() | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||
|
![]() | This article links to one or more target anchors that no longer exist.
Please help fix the broken anchors. You can remove this template after fixing the problems. |
Reporting errors |
This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 22 June 2021 and 1 August 2021. Further details are available
on the course page. Student editor(s):
Chrishaynestemple.
Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT ( talk) 17:18, 17 January 2022 (UTC)
This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 27 August 2020 and 7 December 2020. Further details are available
on the course page. Student editor(s):
Jakob1944,
FatemehEbrahimi1999,
Mhenegar5.
Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT ( talk) 14:17, 16 January 2022 (UTC)
Incorrect. Das Bilderverbots is very unique book with lot of new information like pre islamic tendencies for aniconism in islam etc.
Shouldn't the article mention something about the contrasting views of shia and sunna Muslims? Hakeem.gadi ( talk) 14:30, 18 March 2008 (UTC)
the article is already aware that Aniconism is common among fundamentalist Sunni sects such as Salafis and Wahhabis which puts it into some historical perspective, but a more detailed history of the disputes involved would certainly be appropriate. -- dab (đł) 18:29, 4 August 2009 (UTC)
There are several unmatched parentheses in the hadith quotes, which makes it impossible to determine exactly which are the words added in translation. Please fix this if you can. -- 92.229.181.234 ( talk) 20:24, 9 May 2010 (UTC)
It would be good if the cited hadiths could be marked with how certain they are according to the traditional Islamic scholars. -- 92.229.181.234 ( talk) 20:26, 9 May 2010 (UTC) ________________________
Christianity has no prohibition against depiction of God? Really? Most Protestant sects will not depict Jesus. Catholic and Orthodox theologians bend over backwards to make the point of why their iconography is not idolatrous. There clearly is, at least, a taboo against depiction of God the Father, and to assert otherwise, let alone without sources, is ridiculous. 81.154.144.194 ( talk) 15:38, 22 February 2011 (UTC)
Johnbod, what is the objection to having a paragraph on hilyeler here? It's a notable genre of aniconic Islamic art, and it's not like we're not discussing representations of Muhammad in this article. Cheers, -- J N 466 20:12, 5 November 2011 (UTC)
Please do not remove the original research section tags from Aniconism_in_Islam#Hadith_and_exegesis_examples until the OR problem is resolved. The section contains editor summaries and claims about the tradition followed by primary source information selected by editors to illustrate those summaries. That is as good of an example of original research you are going to get. Griswaldo ( talk) 21:34, 5 November 2011 (UTC)
We have one only one illustration of aniconic art, vs. two of figurative art. That doesn't make much sense in an article titled "Aniconism in Islam". Illustrations should illustrate the article topic, not its opposite. -- J N 466 01:54, 11 November 2011 (UTC)
________________________
Depictions of God are forbidden in Christianity. Depictions of Saints exist, but it is prohibited by church law to venerate them. â Preceding unsigned comment added by 188.247.79.160 ( talk) 05:07, 11 November 2014 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 5 external links on Aniconism in Islam. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
{{
dead link}}
tag to
http://www.sistani.org/istifta_/view_s.php?lang=ara&page=1&subject=When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{
Sourcecheck}}
).
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.â InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 06:43, 14 October 2016 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 3 external links on Aniconism in Islam. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.â InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 05:35, 6 July 2017 (UTC)
We are a group of students editors who attempted to improve this article for a class assignment. The following is a brief summary of the changes made to this Wikipedia article. To begin with, the article has been edited for clarity and to make the language more neutral along with the addition of missing or additional in-text citations. A short paragraph on non-figural art forms was added for additional context. Additional citations were added to the circumvention section of the article and information from unreliable sources were removed. For the Hadith section of the article, paraphrased versions of each one have been made to summarize the essence of the idea of each Hadith and to get rid of the large block quotations. Additionally, references for each Hadith including the specific book, page number, and the number of each Hadith was added to provide a more detailed source for each Hadith. â Preceding unsigned comment added by Jakob1944 ( talk ⢠contribs) 20:17, 9 December 2020 (UTC)
Bookku ( talk) 16:42, 5 February 2024 (UTC)
This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 16 January 2024 and 14 May 2024. Further details are available
on the course page. Student editor(s):
History314 (
article contribs).
â Assignment last updated by Majed Eid M Rahimi ( talk) 14:08, 19 February 2024 (UTC)
A sequence of edits including this one in December 2020 removed details from some citations, rendering them useless. Links to sources were removed, as well as archived links, leaving deeply ironic link-less citations such as "Reza Abbasi Museum Archived September 27, 2016, at the [[Wayback Machine]]". These citations are useless to readers and there doesn't seem to be any attempt to justify them. I have replaced some citation details, but there are probably more that need to be copied from that old version of the article. MartinPoulter ( talk) 22:14, 23 February 2024 (UTC)
![]() | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||
|
![]() | This article links to one or more target anchors that no longer exist.
Please help fix the broken anchors. You can remove this template after fixing the problems. |
Reporting errors |
This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 22 June 2021 and 1 August 2021. Further details are available
on the course page. Student editor(s):
Chrishaynestemple.
Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT ( talk) 17:18, 17 January 2022 (UTC)
This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 27 August 2020 and 7 December 2020. Further details are available
on the course page. Student editor(s):
Jakob1944,
FatemehEbrahimi1999,
Mhenegar5.
Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT ( talk) 14:17, 16 January 2022 (UTC)
Incorrect. Das Bilderverbots is very unique book with lot of new information like pre islamic tendencies for aniconism in islam etc.
Shouldn't the article mention something about the contrasting views of shia and sunna Muslims? Hakeem.gadi ( talk) 14:30, 18 March 2008 (UTC)
the article is already aware that Aniconism is common among fundamentalist Sunni sects such as Salafis and Wahhabis which puts it into some historical perspective, but a more detailed history of the disputes involved would certainly be appropriate. -- dab (đł) 18:29, 4 August 2009 (UTC)
There are several unmatched parentheses in the hadith quotes, which makes it impossible to determine exactly which are the words added in translation. Please fix this if you can. -- 92.229.181.234 ( talk) 20:24, 9 May 2010 (UTC)
It would be good if the cited hadiths could be marked with how certain they are according to the traditional Islamic scholars. -- 92.229.181.234 ( talk) 20:26, 9 May 2010 (UTC) ________________________
Christianity has no prohibition against depiction of God? Really? Most Protestant sects will not depict Jesus. Catholic and Orthodox theologians bend over backwards to make the point of why their iconography is not idolatrous. There clearly is, at least, a taboo against depiction of God the Father, and to assert otherwise, let alone without sources, is ridiculous. 81.154.144.194 ( talk) 15:38, 22 February 2011 (UTC)
Johnbod, what is the objection to having a paragraph on hilyeler here? It's a notable genre of aniconic Islamic art, and it's not like we're not discussing representations of Muhammad in this article. Cheers, -- J N 466 20:12, 5 November 2011 (UTC)
Please do not remove the original research section tags from Aniconism_in_Islam#Hadith_and_exegesis_examples until the OR problem is resolved. The section contains editor summaries and claims about the tradition followed by primary source information selected by editors to illustrate those summaries. That is as good of an example of original research you are going to get. Griswaldo ( talk) 21:34, 5 November 2011 (UTC)
We have one only one illustration of aniconic art, vs. two of figurative art. That doesn't make much sense in an article titled "Aniconism in Islam". Illustrations should illustrate the article topic, not its opposite. -- J N 466 01:54, 11 November 2011 (UTC)
________________________
Depictions of God are forbidden in Christianity. Depictions of Saints exist, but it is prohibited by church law to venerate them. â Preceding unsigned comment added by 188.247.79.160 ( talk) 05:07, 11 November 2014 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 5 external links on Aniconism in Islam. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
{{
dead link}}
tag to
http://www.sistani.org/istifta_/view_s.php?lang=ara&page=1&subject=When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{
Sourcecheck}}
).
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.â InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 06:43, 14 October 2016 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 3 external links on Aniconism in Islam. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.â InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 05:35, 6 July 2017 (UTC)
We are a group of students editors who attempted to improve this article for a class assignment. The following is a brief summary of the changes made to this Wikipedia article. To begin with, the article has been edited for clarity and to make the language more neutral along with the addition of missing or additional in-text citations. A short paragraph on non-figural art forms was added for additional context. Additional citations were added to the circumvention section of the article and information from unreliable sources were removed. For the Hadith section of the article, paraphrased versions of each one have been made to summarize the essence of the idea of each Hadith and to get rid of the large block quotations. Additionally, references for each Hadith including the specific book, page number, and the number of each Hadith was added to provide a more detailed source for each Hadith. â Preceding unsigned comment added by Jakob1944 ( talk ⢠contribs) 20:17, 9 December 2020 (UTC)
Bookku ( talk) 16:42, 5 February 2024 (UTC)
This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 16 January 2024 and 14 May 2024. Further details are available
on the course page. Student editor(s):
History314 (
article contribs).
â Assignment last updated by Majed Eid M Rahimi ( talk) 14:08, 19 February 2024 (UTC)
A sequence of edits including this one in December 2020 removed details from some citations, rendering them useless. Links to sources were removed, as well as archived links, leaving deeply ironic link-less citations such as "Reza Abbasi Museum Archived September 27, 2016, at the [[Wayback Machine]]". These citations are useless to readers and there doesn't seem to be any attempt to justify them. I have replaced some citation details, but there are probably more that need to be copied from that old version of the article. MartinPoulter ( talk) 22:14, 23 February 2024 (UTC)