![]() | This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
80.74.137.161 (14:44, 25 December 2011) had changed the British troop size to be 22,000 from over 30,000. He did give a citation to "The Victorians at war, 1815-1914: an encyclopedia of British military history" where the troop size is indeed given to be 22,000. However this must account only for the first division, at Dinapur, commanded by Major-General Marley, which was the largest and the main division in charge of attacking the capital city. Nevermind that it failed in the task. In <Smith, Plan of Operation, p. 215-219.> is given the detailed breakdown of all the forces. The addition of all the men is clearly greater than 30,000, as Smith correctly insists. ( Manoguru ( talk) 16:21, 25 December 2011 (UTC))
Note: {{ WP India}} Project Banner with Uttarakhand workgroup parameters was added to this article talk page because the article falls under Category:Uttarakhand or its subcategories. Should you feel this addition is inappropriate , please undo my changes and update/remove the relavent categories to the article -- TinuCherian (Wanna Talk?) - 13:30, 23 June 2008 (UTC)
This article is pretty poorly written, someone might want to touch it up a bit —Preceding unsigned comment added by 123.243.214.202 ( talk) 23:37, 27 November 2010 (UTC)
The BOLD/CAPS part of this sentence in the Trade section doesn't make sense to me:
" ... The British had made constant efforts to persuade the Nepalese government TO ALLOW THEM THEIR TRADE TO THE FABLED TIBET through Nepal. ... "
Not knowing the reality of this history, I don't feel qualified to change/edit this sentence. But it would seem to make more sense if it read "... to allow them TO trade WITH the fabled Tibet ... "
Almadenmike ( talk) 06:56, 20 August 2014 (UTC)
The very last line "in 2015 mr tej thapa also along with thapa group in 1815 Nepalese war" does not make any sense to me. Appears some kind of vandalism. -- Satyam Mishra --talk-- 20:42, 6 June 2015 (UTC)
I've been unable to find the source listed for many of the references in the article. "Smith "Plan of Operation". References to it are very vague and any pointing in the right direction would be appreciated. 86.5.160.43 ( talk) 13:01, 12 September 2021 (UTC)
Properly read 2400:1A00:B1C0:D83A:68B3:55A4:160C:C1D5 ( talk) 13:40, 13 April 2022 (UTC)
![]() | This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
80.74.137.161 (14:44, 25 December 2011) had changed the British troop size to be 22,000 from over 30,000. He did give a citation to "The Victorians at war, 1815-1914: an encyclopedia of British military history" where the troop size is indeed given to be 22,000. However this must account only for the first division, at Dinapur, commanded by Major-General Marley, which was the largest and the main division in charge of attacking the capital city. Nevermind that it failed in the task. In <Smith, Plan of Operation, p. 215-219.> is given the detailed breakdown of all the forces. The addition of all the men is clearly greater than 30,000, as Smith correctly insists. ( Manoguru ( talk) 16:21, 25 December 2011 (UTC))
Note: {{ WP India}} Project Banner with Uttarakhand workgroup parameters was added to this article talk page because the article falls under Category:Uttarakhand or its subcategories. Should you feel this addition is inappropriate , please undo my changes and update/remove the relavent categories to the article -- TinuCherian (Wanna Talk?) - 13:30, 23 June 2008 (UTC)
This article is pretty poorly written, someone might want to touch it up a bit —Preceding unsigned comment added by 123.243.214.202 ( talk) 23:37, 27 November 2010 (UTC)
The BOLD/CAPS part of this sentence in the Trade section doesn't make sense to me:
" ... The British had made constant efforts to persuade the Nepalese government TO ALLOW THEM THEIR TRADE TO THE FABLED TIBET through Nepal. ... "
Not knowing the reality of this history, I don't feel qualified to change/edit this sentence. But it would seem to make more sense if it read "... to allow them TO trade WITH the fabled Tibet ... "
Almadenmike ( talk) 06:56, 20 August 2014 (UTC)
The very last line "in 2015 mr tej thapa also along with thapa group in 1815 Nepalese war" does not make any sense to me. Appears some kind of vandalism. -- Satyam Mishra --talk-- 20:42, 6 June 2015 (UTC)
I've been unable to find the source listed for many of the references in the article. "Smith "Plan of Operation". References to it are very vague and any pointing in the right direction would be appreciated. 86.5.160.43 ( talk) 13:01, 12 September 2021 (UTC)
Properly read 2400:1A00:B1C0:D83A:68B3:55A4:160C:C1D5 ( talk) 13:40, 13 April 2022 (UTC)