![]() | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
I removed the whole section; it was speculation, based on knowledge of Rachman which was almost co-incidental. As Barber makes clear in her memoir, the David character was based on a real person she had a real affair with; but this was not Rachman, it was somebody else also in the dirtier end of the property business in London. -- VinceBowdren ( talk) 10:17, 18 November 2009 (UTC)
The taxis are of the modern design, rather than the previous one in use in 1961. Deipnosophista ( talk) 18:38, 4 February 2010 (UTC)
In the article it says that the Pentax K camera used in the film makes an anachronism, as the K-series Pentax cameras were not introduced until the 1970's. However, the came in the movie is a Pentax S2 or S3, which is period correct. Can somebody double-check? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 83.255.163.142 ( talk) 10:24, 20 November 2010 (UTC)
I suggest that this section of the article be deleted; I mean seriously it's a substantial portion of the article yet adds nothing material to one's knowledge of the film, it's basically just showing off by some sad wiki-editor, no doubt aged about 15 (mentally at least), with limited social life and poor personal hygiene; I would add that it's also inconsistent with numerous other articles in wikipedia about films that don't have such a tedious section 16:10, 10 January 2011 (UTC) —Preceding unsigned comment added by 62.232.34.3 ( talk)
In the reception section a critic who wrote that the film is antisemitic is mentioned, yet I really don't believe this represents a valuable opinion and no one else really sees this. Shouldn't it be removed?-- 99.251.94.170 ( talk) 05:02, 16 February 2010 (UTC)
I saw the film with subtitles, and I read “Mellor”. But in the article both names are written… How to know which is the correct one? Jill-Jênn 23:58, 28 March 2010 (UTC)
The content on the "plot" section was added entirely on this edition and it is pretty much the same as in IMDB. I don't know if the user that added it is the owner of the text or what is IMDB licence policy (although I think it is copyrighted content, from the bottom of their page) so I just removed it. If I'm wrong somebody should just undo what I did anyway. - Jorge Morais 19:26, 6 September 2012 (UTC)
![]() | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
I removed the whole section; it was speculation, based on knowledge of Rachman which was almost co-incidental. As Barber makes clear in her memoir, the David character was based on a real person she had a real affair with; but this was not Rachman, it was somebody else also in the dirtier end of the property business in London. -- VinceBowdren ( talk) 10:17, 18 November 2009 (UTC)
The taxis are of the modern design, rather than the previous one in use in 1961. Deipnosophista ( talk) 18:38, 4 February 2010 (UTC)
In the article it says that the Pentax K camera used in the film makes an anachronism, as the K-series Pentax cameras were not introduced until the 1970's. However, the came in the movie is a Pentax S2 or S3, which is period correct. Can somebody double-check? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 83.255.163.142 ( talk) 10:24, 20 November 2010 (UTC)
I suggest that this section of the article be deleted; I mean seriously it's a substantial portion of the article yet adds nothing material to one's knowledge of the film, it's basically just showing off by some sad wiki-editor, no doubt aged about 15 (mentally at least), with limited social life and poor personal hygiene; I would add that it's also inconsistent with numerous other articles in wikipedia about films that don't have such a tedious section 16:10, 10 January 2011 (UTC) —Preceding unsigned comment added by 62.232.34.3 ( talk)
In the reception section a critic who wrote that the film is antisemitic is mentioned, yet I really don't believe this represents a valuable opinion and no one else really sees this. Shouldn't it be removed?-- 99.251.94.170 ( talk) 05:02, 16 February 2010 (UTC)
I saw the film with subtitles, and I read “Mellor”. But in the article both names are written… How to know which is the correct one? Jill-Jênn 23:58, 28 March 2010 (UTC)
The content on the "plot" section was added entirely on this edition and it is pretty much the same as in IMDB. I don't know if the user that added it is the owner of the text or what is IMDB licence policy (although I think it is copyrighted content, from the bottom of their page) so I just removed it. If I'm wrong somebody should just undo what I did anyway. - Jorge Morais 19:26, 6 September 2012 (UTC)