![]() | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
When someone finally provides the citations that this dye is not a carcinogen, he will also have to provide disagreeing scientists opinions that it IS a carcinogen, and once again, Wikipedia will serve its purpose of appeasing the stronger multinational of the jungle. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 99.238.62.92 ( talk) 10:51, 7 January 2009 (UTC)
Why were the references moved to "External Links"? Sleepy012001 19:18, 21 March 2007 (UTC)
Sorry about that- I'm semi-new and thought that if I linked it at the bottom, it would be cited as a reference. I need to go look up how to do references, but feel free to take the links and cross check them and everything. -- Sleepy012001 01:39, 1 June 2007 (UTC)
Take a look at these two articles in the newspaper The Daily Telegraph. Would be nice to have them integrated in the article. [1] [2] MaxPont 21:26, 10 May 2007 (UTC)
Well, it's not. Those sweets in the picture were bought in Germany. -- startaq 18:48, 23 May 2007 (UTC)
Hmm, well it came from one of the sources which I'd accidentally placed in 'external links'... -- Sleepy012001 02:55, 26 May 2007 (UTC)
Two articles from Norwegian Food Safety Authority explain the Norwegian situation where Azo dyes were banned i 1978 and made legal in 2001. In this period azo dyes were only legally used in alcoholic beverages and some fish products. After 2001 is is now allowed for general use. Usage in sweets and ice-cream are now widespead. References: English article dead link archived at https://archive.is/20120804205754/http://www.mattilsynet.no/mat/mattrygghet/tilsetningsstoffer/norway_and_food_additives_34434
In Norwegian with more details
In Sweden the situation was similar. E122, E128, E129, E154, E155 og E180 was banned and restrictions was put on E102, E110, E123, E124 og E151. Seach for E129
All are now allowed in Norway and Sweden to be compliant with Council Directive 94/36/EC. -- Nisselua 07:51, 9 July 2007 (UTC)
I've removed the following, which don't seem to me to have any value or relevance, and are uncited anyway:
In dogs and rats, Allura Red AC is found to be mainly excreted through the feces, with some of the compound coming through the urinary tract. citation needed It is believed that significant retention in the intestinal contents is due to adhesion of the compound to the intestinal wall. citation needed
When applied to human skin, Allura Red AC has not been found to cause irritation or sensitization.
I've copied these here in case anyone thinks they're relevant or notable. - kotra ( talk) 19:39, 10 April 2008 (UTC)
I feel this information is relevant and should be integrated into this article. However, I'm new to modifying wikipedia articles and feel this would best be left to those who are more experienced at doing so.
Food dyes may protect against cancer —Preceding unsigned comment added by 72.220.167.177 ( talk) 06:20, 4 June 2008 (UTC)
I was wondering if we could add a definative health risk for red #40 to the article. I have medical records (and have undergone tests) verifying that red #40 can trigger urticaria and shock (similar to a peanut or shellfish allergy). What do I need to show for this? In addition, I have no other allergies, and the dye does not have any effect on my behavior. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 38.98.68.18 ( talk) 15:42, 14 August 2008 (UTC)
This article talk page was automatically added with {{ WikiProject Food and drink}} banner as it falls under Category:Food or one of its subcategories. If you find this addition an error, Kindly undo the changes and update the inappropriate categories if needed. The bot was instructed to tagg these articles upon consenus from WikiProject Food and drink. You can find the related request for tagging here . Maximum and careful attention was done to avoid any wrongly tagging any categories , but mistakes may happen... If you have concerns , please inform on the project talk page -- TinucherianBot ( talk) 01:17, 4 July 2008 (UTC)
What is the difference between Red 40 and Red 40 Lake? There doesn't seem to be a Wikipedia article on Red 40 Lake, and the Red 40 article doesn't mention anything about Red 40 Lake. Are they the same thing, just different brand names? Or is there a difference? Either way, this is something that should be discussed in the article, considering that the words "Red 40 Lake" appear on the ingredients lists of many products. — BMRR ( talk) 00:40, 5 July 2009 (UTC)
This article seems to have a Euro-centric view of the dye. In Europe, there seems to be a general fear of azo dyes, despite the fact that Red #40 has fewer health risks than some non-azo dyes, including Red #3 (Erythrosine, a fluorone dye) and Green #3 (Fast Green FCF, a triarylmethane dye). There are obvious reasons why those two dyes are rarely used in the USA, and I think this article should be a little more NPOV by globalizing it. ANDROS1337 21:47, 10 November 2009 (UTC)
The article needs to explain the name. Is it a proprietary name of some manufacturer? If not, what authority assigned it? What does "AC" stand for? 18.26.0.5 ( talk) 21:51, 20 July 2010 (UTC)
E129 is on the list of authorized food colorings as published on the website of Belgian Health Dept.
Link in french (cf. 2)
I don't know where the extensive list comes from, but it isn't banned in Switzerland either. On the official government page [3] there is a link to a pdf called 'Liste der zugelassenen Zusatzstoffe' where it is mentioned as allowed. 145.118.239.247 ( talk) —Preceding undated comment added 08:47, 18 July 2013 (UTC)
I am struggling with updating the article on Hungarian Wikipedia and see that the English one also has quite some issues. The whole EU situation seems completely wrong or at least outdated... With the introduction of the new legislation on food additives (Regulation 1333/2008) I do not think it is possible for single member states to ban any additive, since these are authorized at an EU level directly via the Commission Regulation. Szaszicska ( talk) 11:26, 20 July 2014 (UTC)
The compound is a derivative of naphthalene and a dark red powder.
Any dark red powder? A certain dark red powder? Jidanni ( talk) 08:11, 15 December 2017 (UTC)
"Red 40 contains p-Cresidine, which the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services says is “reasonably anticipated” to be a human carcinogen." [4] Jidanni ( talk) 08:25, 15 December 2017 (UTC)
From the article:
Update: it was from this: [5]
I do not see what "bw" is at bw either. -- NoToleranceForIntolerance ( talk) 06:42, 24 February 2018 (UTC)
Basic information to add to this article: what is it made from? How could someone have written this article in the first place and neglected to include that information, which anyone reading this article would expect to find here (especially if it purports to be properly encyclopedic)? 173.88.246.138 ( talk) 01:58, 16 July 2021 (UTC)
thanks to all the contributors who made thihs. interesting read! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Wyattherb ( talk • contribs) 13:50, 2 March 2022 (UTC)
![]() | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
When someone finally provides the citations that this dye is not a carcinogen, he will also have to provide disagreeing scientists opinions that it IS a carcinogen, and once again, Wikipedia will serve its purpose of appeasing the stronger multinational of the jungle. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 99.238.62.92 ( talk) 10:51, 7 January 2009 (UTC)
Why were the references moved to "External Links"? Sleepy012001 19:18, 21 March 2007 (UTC)
Sorry about that- I'm semi-new and thought that if I linked it at the bottom, it would be cited as a reference. I need to go look up how to do references, but feel free to take the links and cross check them and everything. -- Sleepy012001 01:39, 1 June 2007 (UTC)
Take a look at these two articles in the newspaper The Daily Telegraph. Would be nice to have them integrated in the article. [1] [2] MaxPont 21:26, 10 May 2007 (UTC)
Well, it's not. Those sweets in the picture were bought in Germany. -- startaq 18:48, 23 May 2007 (UTC)
Hmm, well it came from one of the sources which I'd accidentally placed in 'external links'... -- Sleepy012001 02:55, 26 May 2007 (UTC)
Two articles from Norwegian Food Safety Authority explain the Norwegian situation where Azo dyes were banned i 1978 and made legal in 2001. In this period azo dyes were only legally used in alcoholic beverages and some fish products. After 2001 is is now allowed for general use. Usage in sweets and ice-cream are now widespead. References: English article dead link archived at https://archive.is/20120804205754/http://www.mattilsynet.no/mat/mattrygghet/tilsetningsstoffer/norway_and_food_additives_34434
In Norwegian with more details
In Sweden the situation was similar. E122, E128, E129, E154, E155 og E180 was banned and restrictions was put on E102, E110, E123, E124 og E151. Seach for E129
All are now allowed in Norway and Sweden to be compliant with Council Directive 94/36/EC. -- Nisselua 07:51, 9 July 2007 (UTC)
I've removed the following, which don't seem to me to have any value or relevance, and are uncited anyway:
In dogs and rats, Allura Red AC is found to be mainly excreted through the feces, with some of the compound coming through the urinary tract. citation needed It is believed that significant retention in the intestinal contents is due to adhesion of the compound to the intestinal wall. citation needed
When applied to human skin, Allura Red AC has not been found to cause irritation or sensitization.
I've copied these here in case anyone thinks they're relevant or notable. - kotra ( talk) 19:39, 10 April 2008 (UTC)
I feel this information is relevant and should be integrated into this article. However, I'm new to modifying wikipedia articles and feel this would best be left to those who are more experienced at doing so.
Food dyes may protect against cancer —Preceding unsigned comment added by 72.220.167.177 ( talk) 06:20, 4 June 2008 (UTC)
I was wondering if we could add a definative health risk for red #40 to the article. I have medical records (and have undergone tests) verifying that red #40 can trigger urticaria and shock (similar to a peanut or shellfish allergy). What do I need to show for this? In addition, I have no other allergies, and the dye does not have any effect on my behavior. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 38.98.68.18 ( talk) 15:42, 14 August 2008 (UTC)
This article talk page was automatically added with {{ WikiProject Food and drink}} banner as it falls under Category:Food or one of its subcategories. If you find this addition an error, Kindly undo the changes and update the inappropriate categories if needed. The bot was instructed to tagg these articles upon consenus from WikiProject Food and drink. You can find the related request for tagging here . Maximum and careful attention was done to avoid any wrongly tagging any categories , but mistakes may happen... If you have concerns , please inform on the project talk page -- TinucherianBot ( talk) 01:17, 4 July 2008 (UTC)
What is the difference between Red 40 and Red 40 Lake? There doesn't seem to be a Wikipedia article on Red 40 Lake, and the Red 40 article doesn't mention anything about Red 40 Lake. Are they the same thing, just different brand names? Or is there a difference? Either way, this is something that should be discussed in the article, considering that the words "Red 40 Lake" appear on the ingredients lists of many products. — BMRR ( talk) 00:40, 5 July 2009 (UTC)
This article seems to have a Euro-centric view of the dye. In Europe, there seems to be a general fear of azo dyes, despite the fact that Red #40 has fewer health risks than some non-azo dyes, including Red #3 (Erythrosine, a fluorone dye) and Green #3 (Fast Green FCF, a triarylmethane dye). There are obvious reasons why those two dyes are rarely used in the USA, and I think this article should be a little more NPOV by globalizing it. ANDROS1337 21:47, 10 November 2009 (UTC)
The article needs to explain the name. Is it a proprietary name of some manufacturer? If not, what authority assigned it? What does "AC" stand for? 18.26.0.5 ( talk) 21:51, 20 July 2010 (UTC)
E129 is on the list of authorized food colorings as published on the website of Belgian Health Dept.
Link in french (cf. 2)
I don't know where the extensive list comes from, but it isn't banned in Switzerland either. On the official government page [3] there is a link to a pdf called 'Liste der zugelassenen Zusatzstoffe' where it is mentioned as allowed. 145.118.239.247 ( talk) —Preceding undated comment added 08:47, 18 July 2013 (UTC)
I am struggling with updating the article on Hungarian Wikipedia and see that the English one also has quite some issues. The whole EU situation seems completely wrong or at least outdated... With the introduction of the new legislation on food additives (Regulation 1333/2008) I do not think it is possible for single member states to ban any additive, since these are authorized at an EU level directly via the Commission Regulation. Szaszicska ( talk) 11:26, 20 July 2014 (UTC)
The compound is a derivative of naphthalene and a dark red powder.
Any dark red powder? A certain dark red powder? Jidanni ( talk) 08:11, 15 December 2017 (UTC)
"Red 40 contains p-Cresidine, which the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services says is “reasonably anticipated” to be a human carcinogen." [4] Jidanni ( talk) 08:25, 15 December 2017 (UTC)
From the article:
Update: it was from this: [5]
I do not see what "bw" is at bw either. -- NoToleranceForIntolerance ( talk) 06:42, 24 February 2018 (UTC)
Basic information to add to this article: what is it made from? How could someone have written this article in the first place and neglected to include that information, which anyone reading this article would expect to find here (especially if it purports to be properly encyclopedic)? 173.88.246.138 ( talk) 01:58, 16 July 2021 (UTC)
thanks to all the contributors who made thihs. interesting read! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Wyattherb ( talk • contribs) 13:50, 2 March 2022 (UTC)