This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
Alien: Romulus article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
![]() | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
The article should be renamed to Alien: Romulus as quoted by all the latest sources.-- 88.14.69.241 ( talk) 13:40, 5 July 2023 (UTC)
I know it's not the usual premise we are used to seeing. However, I don't see an issue with how it is presented since this is all the information we have on any kind of storyline. Mike Allen 21:12, 9 January 2024 (UTC)
What is the problem? Alien 5 ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) was created in 2008, and Aliens 5 ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) was created in 2017. I am RedoStone ( talk · contribs) pointed Alien 5 here back in January. Obviously, there have been other uses of Alien 5, with content on Wikipedia, that is not covered in this article, The way Wikipedia handles these things is with a hatnote. Where is the controversy in pointing out that Alien 5 (disambiguation) can show you to say, Blomkamp's version, or Whedon's version? If your problem is having Alien 5 redirect here at all, then removing the hatnote is not the solution, repointing the redirects to the diambiguation page is the solution, then removing the hatnote. Per WP:DISAMBIGUATION Ensuring that a reader who searches for a topic using a particular term can get to the information on that topic quickly and easily, whichever of the possible topics it might be. shows that there should be a hatnote if the redirect point here, which " Alien 5" does; or we need to repoint it to the disambiguation page. -- 65.92.247.66 ( talk) 18:07, 22 February 2024 (UTC)
Walt Disney Studios Motion Pictures distributes all 20th Century films under the 20th Century Studios label. Avatar: The Way of Water, The Creator, etc., see here. Each other article concerned with this method shows 20th Century Studios as the distributor on the sidebar, and "Released by Walt Disney Studios Motion Pictures under the 20th Century Studios label" under subsection "Release". I wish to keep continuity with every other 20th Century branded film, and, seeing as how this works in every other context, I propose we write it like this in this article. ToNeverFindTheMets ( talk) 23:57, 29 February 2024 (UTC)
According to the director of this film via The Hollywood Reporter here the film is not standalone but does have connections to the other films. So should this be referenced? 0Detail-Attention215 ( talk) 18:08, 21 March 2024 (UTC)
Lately, other users have been removing this film's release date from the infobox. So, when has it been a thing not to put future release dates in the infobox? Why just this film when some others (like Furiosa: A Mad Max Saga, Twisters and Wicked) still have theirs in their infoboxes? CRBoyer 17:18, 12 May 2024 (UTC)
This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
Alien: Romulus article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
![]() | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
The article should be renamed to Alien: Romulus as quoted by all the latest sources.-- 88.14.69.241 ( talk) 13:40, 5 July 2023 (UTC)
I know it's not the usual premise we are used to seeing. However, I don't see an issue with how it is presented since this is all the information we have on any kind of storyline. Mike Allen 21:12, 9 January 2024 (UTC)
What is the problem? Alien 5 ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) was created in 2008, and Aliens 5 ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) was created in 2017. I am RedoStone ( talk · contribs) pointed Alien 5 here back in January. Obviously, there have been other uses of Alien 5, with content on Wikipedia, that is not covered in this article, The way Wikipedia handles these things is with a hatnote. Where is the controversy in pointing out that Alien 5 (disambiguation) can show you to say, Blomkamp's version, or Whedon's version? If your problem is having Alien 5 redirect here at all, then removing the hatnote is not the solution, repointing the redirects to the diambiguation page is the solution, then removing the hatnote. Per WP:DISAMBIGUATION Ensuring that a reader who searches for a topic using a particular term can get to the information on that topic quickly and easily, whichever of the possible topics it might be. shows that there should be a hatnote if the redirect point here, which " Alien 5" does; or we need to repoint it to the disambiguation page. -- 65.92.247.66 ( talk) 18:07, 22 February 2024 (UTC)
Walt Disney Studios Motion Pictures distributes all 20th Century films under the 20th Century Studios label. Avatar: The Way of Water, The Creator, etc., see here. Each other article concerned with this method shows 20th Century Studios as the distributor on the sidebar, and "Released by Walt Disney Studios Motion Pictures under the 20th Century Studios label" under subsection "Release". I wish to keep continuity with every other 20th Century branded film, and, seeing as how this works in every other context, I propose we write it like this in this article. ToNeverFindTheMets ( talk) 23:57, 29 February 2024 (UTC)
According to the director of this film via The Hollywood Reporter here the film is not standalone but does have connections to the other films. So should this be referenced? 0Detail-Attention215 ( talk) 18:08, 21 March 2024 (UTC)
Lately, other users have been removing this film's release date from the infobox. So, when has it been a thing not to put future release dates in the infobox? Why just this film when some others (like Furiosa: A Mad Max Saga, Twisters and Wicked) still have theirs in their infoboxes? CRBoyer 17:18, 12 May 2024 (UTC)