![]() | A fact from Algiers expedition (1541) appeared on Wikipedia's
Main Page in the
Did you know column on 9 November 2009 (
check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
| ![]() |
![]() | This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Algiers expedition (1541). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 14:24, 1 July 2017 (UTC)
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
I launch a Request for comment about the Algiers regency's flag in 1541. -- Panam2014 ( talk) 23:29, 9 July 2017 (UTC)
According to others academic sources, the flag was different:
-- Panam2014 ( talk) 23:29, 9 July 2017 (UTC)
*Support(
Summoned by bot)I am fine with the flag being added to the infobox.
L3X1
(distænt write)
)evidence(
20:50, 18 July 2017 (UTC)
Moreover, Mouloud Gaïd has based his work on Algiers expedition on Galibert's work (first published in 1844), so WP:AGE MATTERS applies too in this case. -- Ms10vc ( talk) 17:37, 24 July 2017 (UTC)
In a nutshell:
-- Ms10vc ( talk) 21:18, 24 July 2017 (UTC)
@ L3X1: this book has been writed on 2007. And Mouloud Gaïd, the author L'Algerie sous les Turcs died on 2000. So there is no evidence as to how was the flag and Gaid is also a great historian. Touati's opinion does not have the monopoly of historical truth. And for Touati, he used a traduction of Al Ghazavat. Moreover, even with a historian's description, it is not possible to draw a flag with the exact colors, proportions and orientations of the patterns orientation. -- Panam2014 ( talk) 11:02, 26 July 2017 (UTC)
Hello @ 185.123.53.37
it seems that you have issue with number of casualties let me say this:
1) I did not make up those number, these number are according to the sources given in the reference section, and they are linked as well you can go to these links and check them, this page was created by (Per Honor et Gloria) and they had the same exact numbers as it can be seen here [11], but for some time they have been changed due to unknown reason, I only corrected them, check the history of editing.
2) how are these sources unreliable, on what basis? why do you think that?, give a clear explanation.
3) you are citing numbers that has no sources at all, you probably took these numbers from Spanish Wikipedia and it has no citation at all, these number are not mentioned in the Spanish article itself, instead it says Las pérdidas fueron muchas, pero no se contabilizaron, ni al parecer hubo voluntad de hacerlo, which says The losses were many, but they were not accounted for, and apparently there was no will to do so.
![]() | A fact from Algiers expedition (1541) appeared on Wikipedia's
Main Page in the
Did you know column on 9 November 2009 (
check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
| ![]() |
![]() | This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Algiers expedition (1541). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 14:24, 1 July 2017 (UTC)
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
I launch a Request for comment about the Algiers regency's flag in 1541. -- Panam2014 ( talk) 23:29, 9 July 2017 (UTC)
According to others academic sources, the flag was different:
-- Panam2014 ( talk) 23:29, 9 July 2017 (UTC)
*Support(
Summoned by bot)I am fine with the flag being added to the infobox.
L3X1
(distænt write)
)evidence(
20:50, 18 July 2017 (UTC)
Moreover, Mouloud Gaïd has based his work on Algiers expedition on Galibert's work (first published in 1844), so WP:AGE MATTERS applies too in this case. -- Ms10vc ( talk) 17:37, 24 July 2017 (UTC)
In a nutshell:
-- Ms10vc ( talk) 21:18, 24 July 2017 (UTC)
@ L3X1: this book has been writed on 2007. And Mouloud Gaïd, the author L'Algerie sous les Turcs died on 2000. So there is no evidence as to how was the flag and Gaid is also a great historian. Touati's opinion does not have the monopoly of historical truth. And for Touati, he used a traduction of Al Ghazavat. Moreover, even with a historian's description, it is not possible to draw a flag with the exact colors, proportions and orientations of the patterns orientation. -- Panam2014 ( talk) 11:02, 26 July 2017 (UTC)
Hello @ 185.123.53.37
it seems that you have issue with number of casualties let me say this:
1) I did not make up those number, these number are according to the sources given in the reference section, and they are linked as well you can go to these links and check them, this page was created by (Per Honor et Gloria) and they had the same exact numbers as it can be seen here [11], but for some time they have been changed due to unknown reason, I only corrected them, check the history of editing.
2) how are these sources unreliable, on what basis? why do you think that?, give a clear explanation.
3) you are citing numbers that has no sources at all, you probably took these numbers from Spanish Wikipedia and it has no citation at all, these number are not mentioned in the Spanish article itself, instead it says Las pérdidas fueron muchas, pero no se contabilizaron, ni al parecer hubo voluntad de hacerlo, which says The losses were many, but they were not accounted for, and apparently there was no will to do so.