This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
Alan Howard (nutritionist) article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
![]() | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||
|
![]() | The
Wikimedia Foundation's
Terms of Use require that editors disclose their "employer, client, and affiliation" with respect to any paid contribution; see
WP:PAID. For advice about reviewing paid contributions, see
WP:COIRESPONSE. Edits made by the below user(s) were last checked for neutrality on 1 May 2020 by Usedtobecool.
|
With regard to the concern about my connection with the subject and also that I received payment for my time spent researching. I declared both of these on my own talk page. Since creating the initial draft which was accepted, I have not received any payments for the time I spend editing. Before commencing the article, I asked for advice in the Teahouse. I have done my best to provide a neutral point of view and to provide source references as far as is possible. I concur with the removal of paragraphs that are not sourced. I thank editors for their help on many details.
I am removing the maintenance tag. I am also discussing and addressing issues raised one by one. Tomp-uk ( talk) 22:20, 18 October 2019 (UTC)
![]() | This edit request by an editor with a conflict of interest has now been answered. |
In the section on The Cambridge Diet, the Dubious tag was inserted. I have now reviewed the reference and the text. I modified the text and added a better reference. I then removed the Dubious tag which I now realise I should not have done. I am asking for an editor to review the text and the reference then assess whether the tag can now be removed. Thank you Tomp-uk ( talk) 09:56, 4 May 2020 (UTC)
@ David notMD:Thank you for checking my edit and removing the Dubious tag. I notice that my "Request for edit" is still in the queue. Will this get removed automatically or do you need to do this? I'm now working on additional secondary references. Tomp-uk ( talk) 09:49, 6 May 2020 (UTC)
@ David notMD:I'm looking at the cn tags. When I either supply a citation or remove the text, can I also remove the cn tag or do I need to go via the Request for edit process? If I need to use the process, can I list them all in one request or must they be individual requests? Thanks David. Tomp-uk ( talk) 12:19, 6 May 2020 (UTC)
@ David notMD:I have now added citations for each of the statements that you identified. I have also made a request to edit, asking that the article be reviewed and the two tags at the top removed. Are you able to help with checking the citations? Thank you. Tomp-uk ( talk) 16:54, 7 May 2020 (UTC)
@ David notMD: @ Usedtobecool: In parallel with obtaining additional citations, could we look at the sources? The following references are, I think, secondary sources. Are these sufficient to support the article?
thank you again for your help. Tomp-uk ( talk) 15:08, 6 May 2020 (UTC)
![]() | This edit request by an editor with a conflict of interest has now been answered. |
This article has two tags applied regarding multiple issues and primary sources. I have edited it to add citations and to provide more secondary sources of which there is a list in the section above this one. This edit request is asking for a review of these changes and the removal of the two tags. If one or more tags cannot yet be removed, please help me understand what else needs to be done? Thank you. Tomp-uk ( talk) 16:46, 7 May 2020 (UTC)
This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
Alan Howard (nutritionist) article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
![]() | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||
|
![]() | The
Wikimedia Foundation's
Terms of Use require that editors disclose their "employer, client, and affiliation" with respect to any paid contribution; see
WP:PAID. For advice about reviewing paid contributions, see
WP:COIRESPONSE. Edits made by the below user(s) were last checked for neutrality on 1 May 2020 by Usedtobecool.
|
With regard to the concern about my connection with the subject and also that I received payment for my time spent researching. I declared both of these on my own talk page. Since creating the initial draft which was accepted, I have not received any payments for the time I spend editing. Before commencing the article, I asked for advice in the Teahouse. I have done my best to provide a neutral point of view and to provide source references as far as is possible. I concur with the removal of paragraphs that are not sourced. I thank editors for their help on many details.
I am removing the maintenance tag. I am also discussing and addressing issues raised one by one. Tomp-uk ( talk) 22:20, 18 October 2019 (UTC)
![]() | This edit request by an editor with a conflict of interest has now been answered. |
In the section on The Cambridge Diet, the Dubious tag was inserted. I have now reviewed the reference and the text. I modified the text and added a better reference. I then removed the Dubious tag which I now realise I should not have done. I am asking for an editor to review the text and the reference then assess whether the tag can now be removed. Thank you Tomp-uk ( talk) 09:56, 4 May 2020 (UTC)
@ David notMD:Thank you for checking my edit and removing the Dubious tag. I notice that my "Request for edit" is still in the queue. Will this get removed automatically or do you need to do this? I'm now working on additional secondary references. Tomp-uk ( talk) 09:49, 6 May 2020 (UTC)
@ David notMD:I'm looking at the cn tags. When I either supply a citation or remove the text, can I also remove the cn tag or do I need to go via the Request for edit process? If I need to use the process, can I list them all in one request or must they be individual requests? Thanks David. Tomp-uk ( talk) 12:19, 6 May 2020 (UTC)
@ David notMD:I have now added citations for each of the statements that you identified. I have also made a request to edit, asking that the article be reviewed and the two tags at the top removed. Are you able to help with checking the citations? Thank you. Tomp-uk ( talk) 16:54, 7 May 2020 (UTC)
@ David notMD: @ Usedtobecool: In parallel with obtaining additional citations, could we look at the sources? The following references are, I think, secondary sources. Are these sufficient to support the article?
thank you again for your help. Tomp-uk ( talk) 15:08, 6 May 2020 (UTC)
![]() | This edit request by an editor with a conflict of interest has now been answered. |
This article has two tags applied regarding multiple issues and primary sources. I have edited it to add citations and to provide more secondary sources of which there is a list in the section above this one. This edit request is asking for a review of these changes and the removal of the two tags. If one or more tags cannot yet be removed, please help me understand what else needs to be done? Thank you. Tomp-uk ( talk) 16:46, 7 May 2020 (UTC)