Article (
|
visual edit |
history) ·
Article talk (
|
history) ·
Watch
Reviewer: Jezhotwells ( talk) 18:10, 24 October 2009 (UTC)
I shall be reviewing this page against the Good Article criteria, following its nomination for Good Article status.
Quick fail criteria assessment
No problems with quick fail criteria. Jezhotwells ( talk) 18:19, 24 October 2009 (UTC)
Not sure what to do here, as I don't have specific dates. --
Scott Free (
talk)
23:05, 31 October 2009 (UTC)
No, only the fact of death is mentioned. Untimely was meant as a temporal description based on inference. Mainly a photo of Williamson and his second wife, with his children from his first marriage. Untimely threrefore referring to the socio-cultural notion that if a mother dies before her children have reached adulthood, then her death is considered premature in regards to her role of child rearing. But if it's just a case of one word, I have no objection to it being removed.--
Scott Free (
talk)
21:18, 3 November 2009 (UTC)
I went through - smoothed things over - wikified - I think it could stand some more work, but I hope the basics have been covered.--
Scott Free (
talk)
23:05, 31 October 2009 (UTC)
#::*1970s: Samples of his sketches also began appearing in various 'fanzines' of the period (Heritage, Squa Tront).[original research?] Care to address this?
Not sure what to do here - the whole 'fan' movement thing in comics has some historical importance for that field. I added references and removed a phrase. --
Scott Free (
talk)
23:08, 31 October 2009 (UTC)
Aces! Will get on it tonight. -- Scott Free ( talk) 16:09, 3 November 2009 (UTC)
Nothing seems to have been done to address the lead as mentioned above. The lead should be a succinct summary of the entire article. If the lead mentions his retirement and his wife Cori then the article should give more detail and vice versa. It needs to be about three paras wrong . Read [[WP:LEAD}} for clues. On hold for three more days, then will be failed if improvements not made. Jezhotwells ( talk) 10:24, 6 November 2009 (UTC)
OK, I've had a chance to read through the article and I will work on the lead probably tomorrow or Sunday. There is definitely some work to be done, but I think I have a good idea of where to go. Throughout the article there is a lot of listing what he worked on from one thing to the next, so I will have to sift through that to get to the juicy bits; I definitely saw some things in there that I'd like to mention in the lead. Also, I think I'd like to break it up into most likely three paragraphs. Note the previous work I did for Alex Raymond, a subject mentioned frequently in this article. BOZ ( talk) 02:38, 7 November 2009 (UTC)
Article (
|
visual edit |
history) ·
Article talk (
|
history) ·
Watch
Reviewer: Jezhotwells ( talk) 18:10, 24 October 2009 (UTC)
I shall be reviewing this page against the Good Article criteria, following its nomination for Good Article status.
Quick fail criteria assessment
No problems with quick fail criteria. Jezhotwells ( talk) 18:19, 24 October 2009 (UTC)
Not sure what to do here, as I don't have specific dates. --
Scott Free (
talk)
23:05, 31 October 2009 (UTC)
No, only the fact of death is mentioned. Untimely was meant as a temporal description based on inference. Mainly a photo of Williamson and his second wife, with his children from his first marriage. Untimely threrefore referring to the socio-cultural notion that if a mother dies before her children have reached adulthood, then her death is considered premature in regards to her role of child rearing. But if it's just a case of one word, I have no objection to it being removed.--
Scott Free (
talk)
21:18, 3 November 2009 (UTC)
I went through - smoothed things over - wikified - I think it could stand some more work, but I hope the basics have been covered.--
Scott Free (
talk)
23:05, 31 October 2009 (UTC)
#::*1970s: Samples of his sketches also began appearing in various 'fanzines' of the period (Heritage, Squa Tront).[original research?] Care to address this?
Not sure what to do here - the whole 'fan' movement thing in comics has some historical importance for that field. I added references and removed a phrase. --
Scott Free (
talk)
23:08, 31 October 2009 (UTC)
Aces! Will get on it tonight. -- Scott Free ( talk) 16:09, 3 November 2009 (UTC)
Nothing seems to have been done to address the lead as mentioned above. The lead should be a succinct summary of the entire article. If the lead mentions his retirement and his wife Cori then the article should give more detail and vice versa. It needs to be about three paras wrong . Read [[WP:LEAD}} for clues. On hold for three more days, then will be failed if improvements not made. Jezhotwells ( talk) 10:24, 6 November 2009 (UTC)
OK, I've had a chance to read through the article and I will work on the lead probably tomorrow or Sunday. There is definitely some work to be done, but I think I have a good idea of where to go. Throughout the article there is a lot of listing what he worked on from one thing to the next, so I will have to sift through that to get to the juicy bits; I definitely saw some things in there that I'd like to mention in the lead. Also, I think I'd like to break it up into most likely three paragraphs. Note the previous work I did for Alex Raymond, a subject mentioned frequently in this article. BOZ ( talk) 02:38, 7 November 2009 (UTC)