This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 1 | Archive 2 |
The Modern AME arose from the the British Aerial Navigation Act of 1919 and the Regulations issued by its authority - regulations and orders which preceded the signing of the International Convention on Aerial Navigation. [1]
The British Aerial Navigation Act of 1920: 1) asserted absolute sovereignty over all parts of His Majesty's dominions and adjacent waters, 2) provided for the application of the International Convention by Order in Council to internal flying, 3) provided for the regulation of civil flying and the supplementing of the Convention, as necessary, by general safety regulations.
Both the British Aerial Navigation Acts of 1919 and 1920 detailed the requirements for the Airworthiness of Aircraft registered within the British Empireas follows: "In order that an aircraft may receive a certificate of airworthiness: its design, including the design of its components, must be approved as satisfying the requirements of safety in regard to both strength and stability; it must be constructed of approved materials and by workmanship of approved quality, and its engine must be approved.
In order that such certificate of airworthiness may be valid on any particular occasion, the aircraft must: be examined before flight and be periodically overhauled by a competent person duly licensed; be so loaded that its total weight does not exceed a given maximum, and its centre of gravity must be situated within certain given limits.
If the application for a certificate of airworthiness is in respect of a type aircraft, the inspection was carried out by representatives of the Aeronautical Inspection Directorate, and, in addition, drawings and particulars were required to be furnished to the Director of Research, as will enable him to approve the design.
In the case of subsequent aircraft constructed by a firm whose inspection is approved, sole responsibility lies with the Aeronautical Research Directorate, the constructor insuring that the conditions governing the inspection of type aircraft are applied to subsequent aircraft.
A certificate of airworthiness of an aircraft registered within the British Empireis not valid unless the aircraft concerned was regularly inspected by a licensed "aeronautical ground engineer" [2]
CanadianAME ( talk) 19:40, 5 January 2017 (UTC)
References
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Aircraft Maintenance Engineer. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 19:44, 28 June 2017 (UTC)
Should the article title be capitalised? That is to say, is it normally capitalised in running text? (See WP:TITLEFORMAT). I have not checked every country involved, but the Canadian regulator does not capitalise it and the UK regulator uses the term more or less descriptively. On the other hand, the Irish regulator does capitalise it. — Cheers, Steelpillow ( Talk) 15:26, 11 June 2021 (UTC)
The result of the move request was: moved. ( closed by non-admin page mover) — Ceso femmuin mbolgaig mbung, mello hi! ( 投稿) 21:36, 2 September 2022 (UTC)
– Per MOS:JOBTITLES and MOS:DOCTCAPS (and WP:NCCAPS more generally), and to be WP:CONSISTENT with around 99% of occupational article titles. This is not a proper name, it's an occupational descriptive phrase. N-grams show that the lower-case form dominates in source material [1] . This is most often capitalized in marketing materials for training programs, in governmentese documents, on business cards, and in other situations in which over-capitalization runs rampant. There are a number of other occupational articles like this that need down-casing, but experience tends to show these topics should be taken in clumps not a huge mass-move). — SMcCandlish ☏ ¢ 😼 10:38, 26 August 2022 (UTC)
The Aviation Wikiproject has been notified of this discussion on its talk page. — Cheers, Steelpillow ( Talk) 14:02, 26 August 2022 (UTC)
The Aircraft Maintenance Engineers qualification and license were instituted in Canada in 1920 when the Canadian Air Regulations introduced Air Engineers and Air Engineer certificates into Canadian Aeronautics law Canadian Air Regulations 1920 see https://archive.org/details/AirRegulationsCanada1920/page/n9/mode/1up 50.99.209.171 ( talk) 18:12, 3 October 2022 (UTC)
This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 1 | Archive 2 |
The Modern AME arose from the the British Aerial Navigation Act of 1919 and the Regulations issued by its authority - regulations and orders which preceded the signing of the International Convention on Aerial Navigation. [1]
The British Aerial Navigation Act of 1920: 1) asserted absolute sovereignty over all parts of His Majesty's dominions and adjacent waters, 2) provided for the application of the International Convention by Order in Council to internal flying, 3) provided for the regulation of civil flying and the supplementing of the Convention, as necessary, by general safety regulations.
Both the British Aerial Navigation Acts of 1919 and 1920 detailed the requirements for the Airworthiness of Aircraft registered within the British Empireas follows: "In order that an aircraft may receive a certificate of airworthiness: its design, including the design of its components, must be approved as satisfying the requirements of safety in regard to both strength and stability; it must be constructed of approved materials and by workmanship of approved quality, and its engine must be approved.
In order that such certificate of airworthiness may be valid on any particular occasion, the aircraft must: be examined before flight and be periodically overhauled by a competent person duly licensed; be so loaded that its total weight does not exceed a given maximum, and its centre of gravity must be situated within certain given limits.
If the application for a certificate of airworthiness is in respect of a type aircraft, the inspection was carried out by representatives of the Aeronautical Inspection Directorate, and, in addition, drawings and particulars were required to be furnished to the Director of Research, as will enable him to approve the design.
In the case of subsequent aircraft constructed by a firm whose inspection is approved, sole responsibility lies with the Aeronautical Research Directorate, the constructor insuring that the conditions governing the inspection of type aircraft are applied to subsequent aircraft.
A certificate of airworthiness of an aircraft registered within the British Empireis not valid unless the aircraft concerned was regularly inspected by a licensed "aeronautical ground engineer" [2]
CanadianAME ( talk) 19:40, 5 January 2017 (UTC)
References
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Aircraft Maintenance Engineer. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 19:44, 28 June 2017 (UTC)
Should the article title be capitalised? That is to say, is it normally capitalised in running text? (See WP:TITLEFORMAT). I have not checked every country involved, but the Canadian regulator does not capitalise it and the UK regulator uses the term more or less descriptively. On the other hand, the Irish regulator does capitalise it. — Cheers, Steelpillow ( Talk) 15:26, 11 June 2021 (UTC)
The result of the move request was: moved. ( closed by non-admin page mover) — Ceso femmuin mbolgaig mbung, mello hi! ( 投稿) 21:36, 2 September 2022 (UTC)
– Per MOS:JOBTITLES and MOS:DOCTCAPS (and WP:NCCAPS more generally), and to be WP:CONSISTENT with around 99% of occupational article titles. This is not a proper name, it's an occupational descriptive phrase. N-grams show that the lower-case form dominates in source material [1] . This is most often capitalized in marketing materials for training programs, in governmentese documents, on business cards, and in other situations in which over-capitalization runs rampant. There are a number of other occupational articles like this that need down-casing, but experience tends to show these topics should be taken in clumps not a huge mass-move). — SMcCandlish ☏ ¢ 😼 10:38, 26 August 2022 (UTC)
The Aviation Wikiproject has been notified of this discussion on its talk page. — Cheers, Steelpillow ( Talk) 14:02, 26 August 2022 (UTC)
The Aircraft Maintenance Engineers qualification and license were instituted in Canada in 1920 when the Canadian Air Regulations introduced Air Engineers and Air Engineer certificates into Canadian Aeronautics law Canadian Air Regulations 1920 see https://archive.org/details/AirRegulationsCanada1920/page/n9/mode/1up 50.99.209.171 ( talk) 18:12, 3 October 2022 (UTC)