Aiphanes is a featured article; it (or a previous version of it) has been identified as one of the best articles produced by the Wikipedia community. Even so, if you can update or improve it, please do so. | |||||||||||||
This article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page as Today's featured article on August 24, 2012. | |||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||
A fact from this article appeared on Wikipedia's
Main Page in the "
Did you know?" column on
January 18, 2010. | |||||||||||||
Current status: Featured article |
This article is rated FA-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||
|
Reviewer: Sasata ( talk) 08:53, 16 January 2010 (UTC) test — Preceding unsigned comment added by 94.69.28.104 ( talk) 09:26, 24 August 2012 (UTC)
Hi, I'll be reviewing this article. I'll make (what I think are) uncontroversial edits as I read the article, and bring anything else up here. Feel free to revert or discuss any changes that have inadvertently altered meaning, or that you just don't like. Hope to have some comments up in a couple of days.
Ok, I did a copyedit, please review the changes and make sure you agree with them. Overall, I thought the article was quite good and easy to read. I have a few comments I've listed below, and will revisit later to check sources, and perform a lit search to see if there's any other info that might be worth including. Sasata ( talk) 18:43, 16 January 2010 (UTC)
continued
The issue at hand is the publication date for Jacquin's name. Older sources give it as 1809, but at some point (~2006, I'm guessing) someone decided that it was actually published earlier, changing the basionym. Mind you, the Missouri Botanical Garden still uses an 1809 publication date [4] despite being aware of the 2008 usage by Borchsenius. Unfortunately, I haven't found the source which re-evaluated the publication date for Jacquin. Guettarda ( talk) 16:06, 19 January 2010 (UTC)
I've fact-checked several of the citations, and everything looks good. I'll place the article on hold until the lead gets filled out. Sasata ( talk) 15:11, 20 January 2010 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Aiphanes. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 09:10, 6 October 2017 (UTC)
Aiphanes is a featured article; it (or a previous version of it) has been identified as one of the best articles produced by the Wikipedia community. Even so, if you can update or improve it, please do so. | |||||||||||||
This article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page as Today's featured article on August 24, 2012. | |||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||
A fact from this article appeared on Wikipedia's
Main Page in the "
Did you know?" column on
January 18, 2010. | |||||||||||||
Current status: Featured article |
This article is rated FA-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||
|
Reviewer: Sasata ( talk) 08:53, 16 January 2010 (UTC) test — Preceding unsigned comment added by 94.69.28.104 ( talk) 09:26, 24 August 2012 (UTC)
Hi, I'll be reviewing this article. I'll make (what I think are) uncontroversial edits as I read the article, and bring anything else up here. Feel free to revert or discuss any changes that have inadvertently altered meaning, or that you just don't like. Hope to have some comments up in a couple of days.
Ok, I did a copyedit, please review the changes and make sure you agree with them. Overall, I thought the article was quite good and easy to read. I have a few comments I've listed below, and will revisit later to check sources, and perform a lit search to see if there's any other info that might be worth including. Sasata ( talk) 18:43, 16 January 2010 (UTC)
continued
The issue at hand is the publication date for Jacquin's name. Older sources give it as 1809, but at some point (~2006, I'm guessing) someone decided that it was actually published earlier, changing the basionym. Mind you, the Missouri Botanical Garden still uses an 1809 publication date [4] despite being aware of the 2008 usage by Borchsenius. Unfortunately, I haven't found the source which re-evaluated the publication date for Jacquin. Guettarda ( talk) 16:06, 19 January 2010 (UTC)
I've fact-checked several of the citations, and everything looks good. I'll place the article on hold until the lead gets filled out. Sasata ( talk) 15:11, 20 January 2010 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Aiphanes. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 09:10, 6 October 2017 (UTC)