![]() | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Not discussed in parliament is a major point of contention that needs to be discussed. see [1] [2] [3] Extorc why are you removing this? Venkat TL ( talk) 10:55, 17 June 2022 (UTC)
"point[s] of contention"to the lead, that appears to me to be a NPOV violation. Let it sit in the section specifically made for it. >>> Extorc. talk 12:58, 17 June 2022 (UTC)
References
I think OROP need to be summarized in the background section. Please help. Venkat TL ( talk) 13:38, 17 June 2022 (UTC)
I propose that sections Protest be split into a separate page called 2022 Agnipath Scheme protest. The ongoing protest against the Agnipath scheme is notable to have a different Wikipedia page. The ongoing protest is enough notable like farmers protest against farm bills. Information related to protest and responses and reactions of various state governments will be added there. Nitesh TALK 08:52, 18 June 2022 (UTC)
The article lacks the events and Incidents of 14 and 15. @ Nitesh003 Please help to add the major events. Venkat TL ( talk) 18:06, 18 June 2022 (UTC)
@ Shashank4a1 This is unsourced and unnecessary.No need for lead figures. Please do not add it. Provide source for SFI first. Discuss all edits that were reverted on the talk page. Venkat TL ( talk) 08:23, 19 June 2022 (UTC)
@ Shashank4a1 I think so far the only update to the scheme is the one time extension of age for 2022, and this is already covered in the overview section. The 10 per cent reservation is not really an update to the Agnipath scheme, it is a related to a future offer (yet to be formally declared) from other departments and PSUs and they can even renegade on these announcements. I believe the 10 per cent reservation announcements should be covered in statements. Moreover according to experts the % is misleading. I think the section "Updates to the scheme" should be removed due to only 1 valid entry that is already covered. Venkat TL ( talk) 13:39, 19 June 2022 (UTC)
The following Wikimedia Commons files used on this page or its Wikidata item have been nominated for deletion:
Participate in the deletion discussions at the nomination pages linked above. — Community Tech bot ( talk) 14:51, 19 June 2022 (UTC)
@VenkatTL I see a few news outlets use the term Agnipath while a few use Agneepath. Same is with government agencies. Could you please help me rename the article to Agnipath/Agneepath Scheme?
Why is an infobox required in Protests section? It doesn't add any significant information to the section as far as I can see. I propose the removal of it. Lord Clayton7 ( talk) 11:39, 20 June 2022 (UTC)
Agniveer was an unnecessary duplicate of Agnipath Scheme everything is already discussed at the scheme page, documents etc are not encyclopedic, candidates should check website of the scheme for such information. User:Gardenkur please check WP:SPLIT procedure and discuss on the talk page if you wish to create related pages. Venkat TL ( talk) 14:02, 20 June 2022 (UTC)
Hi Venkat TL. Thanks for your time and efforts and for your valuable inputs for guiding me. Looking forward to work with you to make Wikipedia a reliable and effective platform for public information. Thanks again. Gardenkur ( talk) 16:20, 20 June 2022 (UTC)
Article excessively uses the unreliable WP:TOI even though there are more reliable sources available. Please avoid adding times sites and replace them with better more reliable sources. @ Shashank4a1, please note. Venkat TL ( talk) 07:55, 21 June 2022 (UTC)
@ Shashank4a1, The news about Bana Singh and his tweet should be added. Venkat TL ( talk) 10:46, 24 June 2022 (UTC)
WP:TOI is not a reliable source. Please get consensus for adding the content you are adding. Venkat TL ( talk) 07:46, 8 July 2022 (UTC)
I think if criticism is added then Support must be added and facts regarding recruitment must be disclosed so there will be no misunderstanding amongs reader. And I think from my past edit with reference Agnipath scheme has got lots of support and also all doubts are cleared by Army Chief so without late we should add support section in this article Het666 ( talk) 18:57, 10 July 2022 (UTC)
And I think NSA and all Armed Forces have given consent to Agnipath scheme and criticism is polical. Millions of enthusiastic youth has applied for Scheme it directly means that they also support this scheme. And Venkat TL please read Vandalism on Wikipedia and Wikipedia:Go ahead, vandalize Het666 ( talk) 19:05, 10 July 2022 (UTC)
Hey this Article itself is saying in Response by Government and in my reference it is particularly said that youth moving towards Agnipath scheme Het666 ( talk) 19:07, 10 July 2022 (UTC)
I have clearly put information with reference Het666 ( talk) 19:10, 10 July 2022 (UTC)
![]() | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Not discussed in parliament is a major point of contention that needs to be discussed. see [1] [2] [3] Extorc why are you removing this? Venkat TL ( talk) 10:55, 17 June 2022 (UTC)
"point[s] of contention"to the lead, that appears to me to be a NPOV violation. Let it sit in the section specifically made for it. >>> Extorc. talk 12:58, 17 June 2022 (UTC)
References
I think OROP need to be summarized in the background section. Please help. Venkat TL ( talk) 13:38, 17 June 2022 (UTC)
I propose that sections Protest be split into a separate page called 2022 Agnipath Scheme protest. The ongoing protest against the Agnipath scheme is notable to have a different Wikipedia page. The ongoing protest is enough notable like farmers protest against farm bills. Information related to protest and responses and reactions of various state governments will be added there. Nitesh TALK 08:52, 18 June 2022 (UTC)
The article lacks the events and Incidents of 14 and 15. @ Nitesh003 Please help to add the major events. Venkat TL ( talk) 18:06, 18 June 2022 (UTC)
@ Shashank4a1 This is unsourced and unnecessary.No need for lead figures. Please do not add it. Provide source for SFI first. Discuss all edits that were reverted on the talk page. Venkat TL ( talk) 08:23, 19 June 2022 (UTC)
@ Shashank4a1 I think so far the only update to the scheme is the one time extension of age for 2022, and this is already covered in the overview section. The 10 per cent reservation is not really an update to the Agnipath scheme, it is a related to a future offer (yet to be formally declared) from other departments and PSUs and they can even renegade on these announcements. I believe the 10 per cent reservation announcements should be covered in statements. Moreover according to experts the % is misleading. I think the section "Updates to the scheme" should be removed due to only 1 valid entry that is already covered. Venkat TL ( talk) 13:39, 19 June 2022 (UTC)
The following Wikimedia Commons files used on this page or its Wikidata item have been nominated for deletion:
Participate in the deletion discussions at the nomination pages linked above. — Community Tech bot ( talk) 14:51, 19 June 2022 (UTC)
@VenkatTL I see a few news outlets use the term Agnipath while a few use Agneepath. Same is with government agencies. Could you please help me rename the article to Agnipath/Agneepath Scheme?
Why is an infobox required in Protests section? It doesn't add any significant information to the section as far as I can see. I propose the removal of it. Lord Clayton7 ( talk) 11:39, 20 June 2022 (UTC)
Agniveer was an unnecessary duplicate of Agnipath Scheme everything is already discussed at the scheme page, documents etc are not encyclopedic, candidates should check website of the scheme for such information. User:Gardenkur please check WP:SPLIT procedure and discuss on the talk page if you wish to create related pages. Venkat TL ( talk) 14:02, 20 June 2022 (UTC)
Hi Venkat TL. Thanks for your time and efforts and for your valuable inputs for guiding me. Looking forward to work with you to make Wikipedia a reliable and effective platform for public information. Thanks again. Gardenkur ( talk) 16:20, 20 June 2022 (UTC)
Article excessively uses the unreliable WP:TOI even though there are more reliable sources available. Please avoid adding times sites and replace them with better more reliable sources. @ Shashank4a1, please note. Venkat TL ( talk) 07:55, 21 June 2022 (UTC)
@ Shashank4a1, The news about Bana Singh and his tweet should be added. Venkat TL ( talk) 10:46, 24 June 2022 (UTC)
WP:TOI is not a reliable source. Please get consensus for adding the content you are adding. Venkat TL ( talk) 07:46, 8 July 2022 (UTC)
I think if criticism is added then Support must be added and facts regarding recruitment must be disclosed so there will be no misunderstanding amongs reader. And I think from my past edit with reference Agnipath scheme has got lots of support and also all doubts are cleared by Army Chief so without late we should add support section in this article Het666 ( talk) 18:57, 10 July 2022 (UTC)
And I think NSA and all Armed Forces have given consent to Agnipath scheme and criticism is polical. Millions of enthusiastic youth has applied for Scheme it directly means that they also support this scheme. And Venkat TL please read Vandalism on Wikipedia and Wikipedia:Go ahead, vandalize Het666 ( talk) 19:05, 10 July 2022 (UTC)
Hey this Article itself is saying in Response by Government and in my reference it is particularly said that youth moving towards Agnipath scheme Het666 ( talk) 19:07, 10 July 2022 (UTC)
I have clearly put information with reference Het666 ( talk) 19:10, 10 July 2022 (UTC)