Agnes Weinrich has been listed as one of the Art and architecture good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. | ||||||||||
| ||||||||||
A fact from this article was featured on Wikipedia's Main Page in the " On this day..." column on July 16, 2023. |
This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Agnes Weinrich. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{
Sourcecheck}}
).
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 16:16, 5 October 2016 (UTC)
GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Reviewer: Thebiguglyalien ( talk · contribs) 20:14, 25 October 2022 (UTC)
GA review – see
WP:WIAGA for criteria
Hello, I'll begin reviewing this article. Thebiguglyalien ( talk) 20:14, 25 October 2022 (UTC)
Agnes studied at the School of the Art Institute of Chicago under John Vanderpoel, Nellie Walker, and others– The source also lists Frederick W. Freer and Ralph Elmer Clarkson. Is there any reason for the selection of names here?
This drawing is shown here (see Image No. 1).– This format interrupts the flow of the text. Instead of numbering the images, perhaps it would be better to write out their full titles in the text. With a few exceptions, articles shouldn’t reference themselves by saying things like "here". This applies to all 12 such labels.
Weinrich was somewhat in advance of Knaths in adopting a modernist style.– This could probably be reworded.
This critic characterized the artists as "radicals"– This is a redundancy as the word "radicals" was already used in the previous quote.
Critics were not always pleased with what they saw, but occasionally balanced their critiques with praise.– This could be said of just about any artist, and I don’t think this sentence adds anything to the article.
she received one unqualified rave review– Is this a technical term?
News sources report three solo exhibitions– Avoid attributing to vague "news sources". It might read better if it said "She held multiple solo exhibitions, including..." or something to that effect.
Its main source is Louise Noun's article on Weinrich in Woman's Art Journal– This list doesn’t need attribution, particularly if some of the attributed sources don’t have corresponding inline citations. It would probably be better to remove this sentence and apply inline citations where appropriate.
Weinrich's principal biographer, Louise Noun.– According to whom is Noun her principal biographer? This shouldn't be claimed unless it's stated as a biographical fact in its own right with a citation.
Her output continued to vary in subject matter and treatment.) and Critical reception (
an environment where men attracted more critical attention and sold more works of art.)
Thanks, Thebiguglyalien. I have tried to correct the problems you identified without adding new ones. In one or two instances — details of later life for example — I was hampered by lack of information, and noted this fact. My numbering of images was a somewhat awkward attempt to help readers using small screens to relate images to text. I followed your suggestion but am not sure the result is better than the awkwardness and self-referencing of the numbering approach. -- Delabrede ( talk)
Available sources give little information about the latter stages of her career.– While it may be true, this seems to be original research and probably shouldn't be included without a source explicitly saying that this information is unknown.
Essentially, once information on her style is sufficiently covered and organized, this should meet the GA criteria. Thebiguglyalien ( talk) 17:07, 27 October 2022 (UTC)
The result was: rejected by
BorgQueen (
talk)
01:20, 12 January 2023 (UTC)
Improved to Good Article status by Delabrede ( talk). Nominated by Onegreatjoke ( talk) at 21:04, 2 November 2022 (UTC).
Agnes Weinrich has been listed as one of the Art and architecture good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. | ||||||||||
| ||||||||||
A fact from this article was featured on Wikipedia's Main Page in the " On this day..." column on July 16, 2023. |
This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Agnes Weinrich. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{
Sourcecheck}}
).
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 16:16, 5 October 2016 (UTC)
GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Reviewer: Thebiguglyalien ( talk · contribs) 20:14, 25 October 2022 (UTC)
GA review – see
WP:WIAGA for criteria
Hello, I'll begin reviewing this article. Thebiguglyalien ( talk) 20:14, 25 October 2022 (UTC)
Agnes studied at the School of the Art Institute of Chicago under John Vanderpoel, Nellie Walker, and others– The source also lists Frederick W. Freer and Ralph Elmer Clarkson. Is there any reason for the selection of names here?
This drawing is shown here (see Image No. 1).– This format interrupts the flow of the text. Instead of numbering the images, perhaps it would be better to write out their full titles in the text. With a few exceptions, articles shouldn’t reference themselves by saying things like "here". This applies to all 12 such labels.
Weinrich was somewhat in advance of Knaths in adopting a modernist style.– This could probably be reworded.
This critic characterized the artists as "radicals"– This is a redundancy as the word "radicals" was already used in the previous quote.
Critics were not always pleased with what they saw, but occasionally balanced their critiques with praise.– This could be said of just about any artist, and I don’t think this sentence adds anything to the article.
she received one unqualified rave review– Is this a technical term?
News sources report three solo exhibitions– Avoid attributing to vague "news sources". It might read better if it said "She held multiple solo exhibitions, including..." or something to that effect.
Its main source is Louise Noun's article on Weinrich in Woman's Art Journal– This list doesn’t need attribution, particularly if some of the attributed sources don’t have corresponding inline citations. It would probably be better to remove this sentence and apply inline citations where appropriate.
Weinrich's principal biographer, Louise Noun.– According to whom is Noun her principal biographer? This shouldn't be claimed unless it's stated as a biographical fact in its own right with a citation.
Her output continued to vary in subject matter and treatment.) and Critical reception (
an environment where men attracted more critical attention and sold more works of art.)
Thanks, Thebiguglyalien. I have tried to correct the problems you identified without adding new ones. In one or two instances — details of later life for example — I was hampered by lack of information, and noted this fact. My numbering of images was a somewhat awkward attempt to help readers using small screens to relate images to text. I followed your suggestion but am not sure the result is better than the awkwardness and self-referencing of the numbering approach. -- Delabrede ( talk)
Available sources give little information about the latter stages of her career.– While it may be true, this seems to be original research and probably shouldn't be included without a source explicitly saying that this information is unknown.
Essentially, once information on her style is sufficiently covered and organized, this should meet the GA criteria. Thebiguglyalien ( talk) 17:07, 27 October 2022 (UTC)
The result was: rejected by
BorgQueen (
talk)
01:20, 12 January 2023 (UTC)
Improved to Good Article status by Delabrede ( talk). Nominated by Onegreatjoke ( talk) at 21:04, 2 November 2022 (UTC).