This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
Aerodyne Technologies article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
![]() | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
![]() | This article is written in British English, which has its own spelling conventions (colour, travelled, centre, defence, artefact, analyse) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus. |
![]() |
Daily pageviews of this article
A graph should have been displayed here but
graphs are temporarily disabled. Until they are enabled again, visit the interactive graph at
pageviews.wmcloud.org |
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Aerodyne Technologies. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{
Sourcecheck}}
).
An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.
Cheers.— cyberbot II Talk to my owner:Online 10:06, 3 July 2016 (UTC)
User:Ahunt one independent source falls way short of WP:GNG and WP:NCORP. I presume this is notable, but just needs WP:V. All the product articles should be merged into this if they fail WP:GNG / WP:NPRODUCT per policy / guideline. I'm sure you know this, we do have to maintain standards especially with companies and products. Widefox; talk 21:04, 11 January 2019 (UTC)
participants in a WikiProject cannot decide that some generally accepted policy or guideline does not apply to articles within its scope. Widefox; talk 03:26, 12 January 2019 (UTC)
per talk - WP:N / WP:NPRODUCT per policy / guideline for non-notable Widefox; talk 21:46, 11 January 2019 (UTC)
per talk - WP:N / WP:NPRODUCT per policy / guideline for non-notable Widefox; talk 21:47, 11 January 2019 (UTC)
per talk - WP:N / WP:NPRODUCT per policy / guideline for non-notable Widefox; talk 21:47, 11 January 2019 (UTC)
per talk - WP:N / WP:NPRODUCT per policy / guideline for non-notable Widefox; talk 21:48, 11 January 2019 (UTC)
per talk - WP:N / WP:NPRODUCT per policy / guideline for non-notable Widefox; talk 21:49, 11 January 2019 (UTC)
Note: Notification of the existence of this discussion has been made at WikiProject Aviation and WikiProject Aircraft, within whose scope this article falls. - Ahunt ( talk) 22:04, 11 January 2019 (UTC)
This article has been tagged as "This article may rely excessively on sources too closely associated with the subject, potentially preventing the article from being verifiable and neutral." The text is mainly sourced to Bertrand, Noel; Rene Coulon; et al: World Directory of Leisure Aviation 2003-04, page 10. Pagefast Ltd, Lancaster UK, 2003. ISSN 1368-485X which is an independent third party reference with independent editorial oversight that is published in several languages around the world. This is a high quality reference written and published by a team of experts. The use of this ref has been discussed in the past on WP:AIR and the consensus was that it is a reliable source. - Ahunt ( talk) 22:08, 11 January 2019 (UTC)
Avoid creating multiple stubs about each individual product...If a non-notable product or service has its own article, be bold and merge it into an article with a broader scope (for example, an article about the type of product) or follow one of the deletion processes.. Widefox; talk 00:46, 12 January 2019 (UTC)
This article has been tagged as "This article may have too many links to other articles...." I have re-read it and I can't identify any links that could be removed. Perhaps you could indicate which ones are surplus and therefore could be removed, to address this open tag? - Ahunt ( talk) 02:02, 12 January 2019 (UTC)
Red links for subjects that should have articles but do not, are not only acceptable, but needed in the articles. They serve as a clear indication of which articles are in need of creation, and encourage it. Do not remove red links unless you are certain that Wikipedia should not have an article on that subject.It is possible that Aerodyne International Group, being what seems to be a holding company, would be an unlikely future article and could be delinked. Not sure why you would say the blue links don't meet GNG. Currently all but one of the aircraft type blue links have at least two independent third party refs and the rest are to place articles such as Étrembières and Mauritius, or to well sourced general subjects such as flight training and paraglider. - Ahunt ( talk) 13:47, 12 January 2019 (UTC)
This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
Aerodyne Technologies article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
![]() | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
![]() | This article is written in British English, which has its own spelling conventions (colour, travelled, centre, defence, artefact, analyse) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus. |
![]() |
Daily pageviews of this article
A graph should have been displayed here but
graphs are temporarily disabled. Until they are enabled again, visit the interactive graph at
pageviews.wmcloud.org |
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Aerodyne Technologies. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{
Sourcecheck}}
).
An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.
Cheers.— cyberbot II Talk to my owner:Online 10:06, 3 July 2016 (UTC)
User:Ahunt one independent source falls way short of WP:GNG and WP:NCORP. I presume this is notable, but just needs WP:V. All the product articles should be merged into this if they fail WP:GNG / WP:NPRODUCT per policy / guideline. I'm sure you know this, we do have to maintain standards especially with companies and products. Widefox; talk 21:04, 11 January 2019 (UTC)
participants in a WikiProject cannot decide that some generally accepted policy or guideline does not apply to articles within its scope. Widefox; talk 03:26, 12 January 2019 (UTC)
per talk - WP:N / WP:NPRODUCT per policy / guideline for non-notable Widefox; talk 21:46, 11 January 2019 (UTC)
per talk - WP:N / WP:NPRODUCT per policy / guideline for non-notable Widefox; talk 21:47, 11 January 2019 (UTC)
per talk - WP:N / WP:NPRODUCT per policy / guideline for non-notable Widefox; talk 21:47, 11 January 2019 (UTC)
per talk - WP:N / WP:NPRODUCT per policy / guideline for non-notable Widefox; talk 21:48, 11 January 2019 (UTC)
per talk - WP:N / WP:NPRODUCT per policy / guideline for non-notable Widefox; talk 21:49, 11 January 2019 (UTC)
Note: Notification of the existence of this discussion has been made at WikiProject Aviation and WikiProject Aircraft, within whose scope this article falls. - Ahunt ( talk) 22:04, 11 January 2019 (UTC)
This article has been tagged as "This article may rely excessively on sources too closely associated with the subject, potentially preventing the article from being verifiable and neutral." The text is mainly sourced to Bertrand, Noel; Rene Coulon; et al: World Directory of Leisure Aviation 2003-04, page 10. Pagefast Ltd, Lancaster UK, 2003. ISSN 1368-485X which is an independent third party reference with independent editorial oversight that is published in several languages around the world. This is a high quality reference written and published by a team of experts. The use of this ref has been discussed in the past on WP:AIR and the consensus was that it is a reliable source. - Ahunt ( talk) 22:08, 11 January 2019 (UTC)
Avoid creating multiple stubs about each individual product...If a non-notable product or service has its own article, be bold and merge it into an article with a broader scope (for example, an article about the type of product) or follow one of the deletion processes.. Widefox; talk 00:46, 12 January 2019 (UTC)
This article has been tagged as "This article may have too many links to other articles...." I have re-read it and I can't identify any links that could be removed. Perhaps you could indicate which ones are surplus and therefore could be removed, to address this open tag? - Ahunt ( talk) 02:02, 12 January 2019 (UTC)
Red links for subjects that should have articles but do not, are not only acceptable, but needed in the articles. They serve as a clear indication of which articles are in need of creation, and encourage it. Do not remove red links unless you are certain that Wikipedia should not have an article on that subject.It is possible that Aerodyne International Group, being what seems to be a holding company, would be an unlikely future article and could be delinked. Not sure why you would say the blue links don't meet GNG. Currently all but one of the aircraft type blue links have at least two independent third party refs and the rest are to place articles such as Étrembières and Mauritius, or to well sourced general subjects such as flight training and paraglider. - Ahunt ( talk) 13:47, 12 January 2019 (UTC)