This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Materials Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Materials, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Materials on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MaterialsWikipedia:WikiProject MaterialsTemplate:WikiProject MaterialsMaterials articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the importance scale.

The units in the table are non-SI (SI) units. I don't know whether there is a policy on wikipedia, but I would suggest putting the non SI units between brackets and the SI units up front. The 'ksi' unit is a bit weird for European engineers. I suggest this, because the English Wikipedia is ought to be universal (for the whole globe), not just UK. Please advice. -- Rubdos ( talk) 20:46, 16 November 2015 (UTC) reply

Disagree- The US Aerospace industry predominantly uses US Customary units. AerMet is made in the US, predominantly for US usage. As such, US Customary (SI) is more appropriate than the other way around. 71.86.140.226 ( talk) 21:27, 26 November 2018 (UTC) reply