This redirect does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Star Wars This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Star Wars, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the Star Wars saga on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Star WarsWikipedia:WikiProject Star WarsTemplate:WikiProject Star WarsStar Wars articles WikiProject Star Wars To-do: history watch purge Here are some tasks awaiting attention: Assess : Tag the talk pages of Star Wars-related articles with the {{ WikiProject Star Wars}} banner. Update the classification of articles in Category:Unassessed Star Wars articles and Category:Unknown-importance Star Wars articles. Citing sources : Jedi, Sith Cleanup : Remove any In-universe information at Category:Star Wars articles that need to differentiate between fact and fiction. Copyedit : Under Early Life. Fix grammar of "towns (plural) predominantly Protestant technical college" to "town's (possessive)..." Stubs : Category:Star Wars stubs Other : * See the things to do page Notability: Articles with notability concerns, listed at WikiProject Notability

was the jedi interceptor used by the clone army, or just the Jedi's??? —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 82.35.168.60 ( talk •  contribs) .

Commonsense would say just the Jedi, seeing as how the clones had their own fighters.-- Kross 19:42, Jun 10, 2005 (UTC)

The Jedi Interceptor is used exclusive to the Jedi... [ Star Wars Databank] Axel Driken

Common sense would also say that putting nearly 200 of these fighters as a standard compliment on a Star Destroyer is either indicative of a wider pilot group, or an extremely poor use of space. Especially considering how thinly the Jedi were spread at the end of the war.

"The standard fighter complement of a Venator-class Star Destroyer included 192 Eta-2 interceptors." —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 204.76.128.217 ( talk •  contribs) .

The above statement can be found at Star Wars Databank Axel Driken 18:42, 24 November 2005 (UTC) reply

I've found another article called Jedi interceptor, which is describing the same fighter... I was wondering if it's a good idea to merge the two... I really like the content in this page, but I think Jedi Interceptor is a better name for it. Any comments? Axel Driken

Hm. This sounds like a good suggestion. It would make more sense. -HunterKiller360 —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 4.245.75.239 ( talk •  contribs) .