![]() | This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Where was the consensus? Why was it moved unilaterally without the proper WP:RM process? I for one contest User:Nado158's reasoning. IJA ( talk) 16:50, 10 June 2014 (UTC)
The result of the move request was: page moved. Armbrust The Homunculus 09:57, 17 June 2014 (UTC)
Trepča Stadium → Olympic Stadium Adem Jashari – The Article Olympic Stadium Adem Jashari was moved to Trepča Stadium unilaterally by User:Nado158 without the Wikipedia:Requested moves process. I for one contest User:Nado158's reasoning. It is important that we move pages via the proper processes with a consensus. I am now unable to restore the status quo as it says "You do not have permission to move this page, for the following reason: A page of that name already exists, or the name you have chosen is not valid. Please choose another name". I do not believe Nado158's rationale is fair either. The Serbian name certainly isn't neutral either. I propose restoring the status quo. I also propose moving it per WP:COMMONNAME, it is the predominant name for the stadium in the English language. Here are just a few recent examples BBC Kosova Press RoK Ministry of Sport and Culture SPORTAL New Zealand Daily Sabah Inside the Games Balkan EU Soccer Way Haiti Sports World Bulletin Regards IJA ( talk) 17:34, 10 June 2014 (UTC)
Dear IJA, So i think a neutral name will be Trepca Stadium? or Trepcha Stadium? This is neutral, but not Adem Jahari Stadium. What you think about that) Yes, its English Wikipedia, but not only for English people, in many countries they dont accept the new name.-- Nado158 ( talk) 13:54, 13 June 2014 (UTC)
Dear, User:Ryulong, be careful with your words ok, you dont know nothing abut the sport in this region and its history. This are not my opinion or nationalistic slant ok. You dont nothing. Nationalistic is to destroy and rape history and take foreign history from others and take it as own. Nothing is my opinion, this are historical facts. To remove these facts or to block these facts are nationalistic slant.-- Nado158 ( talk) 13:58, 13 June 2014 (UTC)
Ok, but FIFA and UEFA dont recognize the Kosovar Football Association, the league system, and thus the clubs and football team not also, so It can not be official Adem Jashari Stadium. Also, the club annex the stadium from a club who was established in 1932, take the club history of an the club which was founded un 1932, represent it as his own and hogging the stadium. This must be explained. So I wanted a neutral name, neither Serbian nor Albanian one, like Trepca, because both clubs bear the name, thats all. So if I dont have support for this, for the true historical expiration i can changed, but i must respect it. But my POV isnt. Nado158 ( talk) 11:47, 14 June 2014 (UTC)
For the Pristina International Airport, we found also a neutral solution, and why not also for the Trepca Stadium, because both clubs bear also the name Trepca???? So this is really neutral and not POV ord nationalistic POV. We dont need postfix Adem Jashari to recognize the Trepca Stadium in this special and poor situation. Nado158 ( talk) 12:29, 14 June 2014 (UTC)
Itsbn007 has changed the infobox image to a computer rendering purported to be an image of what the stadium will look like after its current renovations are complete. There is insufficient information on the image's Commons page to ascertain its source or verify that it relates to this stadium at all. And even if it does, an actual image of the stadium today is preferable to a rending of what might be in the future. (See Wikipedia is not a crystal ball.) Two editors (myself here and BalkanianActuality here) have reverted this change, with Itsbn007 reverting back each time. Itsbn007, I will remind you that Wikipedia is a collaborative effort; individual editors don't get to make decisions in a vacuum, but through a process of WP:CONSENSUS. So I will ask you, Itsbn007, to explain why you feel that your preferred image is better, and we can try to reach an agreement on the issue. WikiDan61 ChatMe! ReadMe!! 20:59, 18 May 2024 (UTC)
THIS STADIUM Itsbn007 ( talk) 10:51, 20 May 2024 (UTC)
Go fix your countrys stadium not mine Itsbn007 ( talk) 12:25, 20 May 2024 (UTC)
Itsbn007 Has again restored the section on Renovation at the very start of the article, prior to any other history, when there is already a section on the Renovation (2024) in the article. I ask Itsbn to explain why this redundant material is necessary? WikiDan61 ChatMe! ReadMe!! 18:24, 23 May 2024 (UTC)
![]() | This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Where was the consensus? Why was it moved unilaterally without the proper WP:RM process? I for one contest User:Nado158's reasoning. IJA ( talk) 16:50, 10 June 2014 (UTC)
The result of the move request was: page moved. Armbrust The Homunculus 09:57, 17 June 2014 (UTC)
Trepča Stadium → Olympic Stadium Adem Jashari – The Article Olympic Stadium Adem Jashari was moved to Trepča Stadium unilaterally by User:Nado158 without the Wikipedia:Requested moves process. I for one contest User:Nado158's reasoning. It is important that we move pages via the proper processes with a consensus. I am now unable to restore the status quo as it says "You do not have permission to move this page, for the following reason: A page of that name already exists, or the name you have chosen is not valid. Please choose another name". I do not believe Nado158's rationale is fair either. The Serbian name certainly isn't neutral either. I propose restoring the status quo. I also propose moving it per WP:COMMONNAME, it is the predominant name for the stadium in the English language. Here are just a few recent examples BBC Kosova Press RoK Ministry of Sport and Culture SPORTAL New Zealand Daily Sabah Inside the Games Balkan EU Soccer Way Haiti Sports World Bulletin Regards IJA ( talk) 17:34, 10 June 2014 (UTC)
Dear IJA, So i think a neutral name will be Trepca Stadium? or Trepcha Stadium? This is neutral, but not Adem Jahari Stadium. What you think about that) Yes, its English Wikipedia, but not only for English people, in many countries they dont accept the new name.-- Nado158 ( talk) 13:54, 13 June 2014 (UTC)
Dear, User:Ryulong, be careful with your words ok, you dont know nothing abut the sport in this region and its history. This are not my opinion or nationalistic slant ok. You dont nothing. Nationalistic is to destroy and rape history and take foreign history from others and take it as own. Nothing is my opinion, this are historical facts. To remove these facts or to block these facts are nationalistic slant.-- Nado158 ( talk) 13:58, 13 June 2014 (UTC)
Ok, but FIFA and UEFA dont recognize the Kosovar Football Association, the league system, and thus the clubs and football team not also, so It can not be official Adem Jashari Stadium. Also, the club annex the stadium from a club who was established in 1932, take the club history of an the club which was founded un 1932, represent it as his own and hogging the stadium. This must be explained. So I wanted a neutral name, neither Serbian nor Albanian one, like Trepca, because both clubs bear the name, thats all. So if I dont have support for this, for the true historical expiration i can changed, but i must respect it. But my POV isnt. Nado158 ( talk) 11:47, 14 June 2014 (UTC)
For the Pristina International Airport, we found also a neutral solution, and why not also for the Trepca Stadium, because both clubs bear also the name Trepca???? So this is really neutral and not POV ord nationalistic POV. We dont need postfix Adem Jashari to recognize the Trepca Stadium in this special and poor situation. Nado158 ( talk) 12:29, 14 June 2014 (UTC)
Itsbn007 has changed the infobox image to a computer rendering purported to be an image of what the stadium will look like after its current renovations are complete. There is insufficient information on the image's Commons page to ascertain its source or verify that it relates to this stadium at all. And even if it does, an actual image of the stadium today is preferable to a rending of what might be in the future. (See Wikipedia is not a crystal ball.) Two editors (myself here and BalkanianActuality here) have reverted this change, with Itsbn007 reverting back each time. Itsbn007, I will remind you that Wikipedia is a collaborative effort; individual editors don't get to make decisions in a vacuum, but through a process of WP:CONSENSUS. So I will ask you, Itsbn007, to explain why you feel that your preferred image is better, and we can try to reach an agreement on the issue. WikiDan61 ChatMe! ReadMe!! 20:59, 18 May 2024 (UTC)
THIS STADIUM Itsbn007 ( talk) 10:51, 20 May 2024 (UTC)
Go fix your countrys stadium not mine Itsbn007 ( talk) 12:25, 20 May 2024 (UTC)
Itsbn007 Has again restored the section on Renovation at the very start of the article, prior to any other history, when there is already a section on the Renovation (2024) in the article. I ask Itsbn to explain why this redundant material is necessary? WikiDan61 ChatMe! ReadMe!! 18:24, 23 May 2024 (UTC)