This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
Action of 12 May 1796 article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
![]() | Action of 12 May 1796 has been listed as one of the
Warfare good articles under the
good article criteria. If you can improve it further,
please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can
reassess it. Review: February 22, 2015. ( Reviewed version). |
![]() | This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Reviewer: Caponer ( talk · contribs) 15:56, 22 February 2015 (UTC)
Jackyd101, I will complete a thorough and comprehensive review of this article within the next 48 hours. Please let me know if you have any questions or comments for me in the meantime. Thanks again! --
Caponer (
talk)
15:56, 22 February 2015 (UTC)
Jackyd101, I have completed a thorough review and re-review of this article and I assess it to meet all the criteria for Good Article status. I do, however, have a few comments and questions that should be addressed prior to its passage to Good Article status. Thank you again for your incredible efforts in completing this article! -- Caponer ( talk) 16:07, 22 February 2015 (UTC)
Lede
Background
Battle
Aftermath
Batavian and Dutch were used interchangeably in the sources, but I appreciate it is confusing and have settled on Batavian as the more technically accurate term. Thanks for the review!-- Jackyd101 ( talk) 16:18, 22 February 2015 (UTC)
This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
Action of 12 May 1796 article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
![]() | Action of 12 May 1796 has been listed as one of the
Warfare good articles under the
good article criteria. If you can improve it further,
please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can
reassess it. Review: February 22, 2015. ( Reviewed version). |
![]() | This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Reviewer: Caponer ( talk · contribs) 15:56, 22 February 2015 (UTC)
Jackyd101, I will complete a thorough and comprehensive review of this article within the next 48 hours. Please let me know if you have any questions or comments for me in the meantime. Thanks again! --
Caponer (
talk)
15:56, 22 February 2015 (UTC)
Jackyd101, I have completed a thorough review and re-review of this article and I assess it to meet all the criteria for Good Article status. I do, however, have a few comments and questions that should be addressed prior to its passage to Good Article status. Thank you again for your incredible efforts in completing this article! -- Caponer ( talk) 16:07, 22 February 2015 (UTC)
Lede
Background
Battle
Aftermath
Batavian and Dutch were used interchangeably in the sources, but I appreciate it is confusing and have settled on Batavian as the more technically accurate term. Thanks for the review!-- Jackyd101 ( talk) 16:18, 22 February 2015 (UTC)