This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||
|
This article links to one or more target anchors that no longer exist.
Please help fix the broken anchors. You can remove this template after fixing the problems. |
Reporting errors |
We may not state as a fact that the Shulkhan Arukh is from the Rishonim era. That is only the opinion of some people. Many other Orthodox rabbis note that the Shulkhan Arukh is actually from the era of the Acharonim.
See this analysis. http://www.ottmall.com/mj_ht_arch/v27/mj_v27i48.html#COF
Even more interesting, see this Orthodox conclusion: http://www.ottmall.com/mj_ht_arch/v27/mj_v27i51.html#CPI
Also, Margaliot (Encyclopedia L'Toldot Gedolei Yisrael) brings Rabbi Yosef Karo down as an Acharon, not a Rishon.
Also, it is a Jewish folk-myth that an Acharon cannot disagree with a Rishon. 'In fact, such a position is not a part of Jewish law! We cannot present such positions as facts, when they are merely accepted folkways, not halakhot.
I read this statement in the article, and very soon got completely confused:
"According to Orthodox Jewish tradition, scholars in one era within the history of halachic development do not challenge the rulings of previous-era scholars, and hence Acharonim cannot dispute the rulings of rabbis of previous eras unless they find support from other rabbis of previous eras."
This needs explanation. What are scholars not allowed to challenge? And why? What determines the beginning of period? Even understanding that, as suggested above, this is a folk-myth...explain it! Piano non troppo ( talk) 07:15, 12 October 2008 (UTC)
Will the Acharonim era ever end? If so, when? And what will be the name of the era that succeeds it? FiredanceThroughTheNight ( talk) 19:07, 12 April 2013 (UTC)
Under Josef Chaim and Ben Ish Chai on the bottom. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 100.2.127.140 ( talk) 00:28, 5 February 2015 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Acharonim. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 13:09, 24 December 2017 (UTC)
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||
|
This article links to one or more target anchors that no longer exist.
Please help fix the broken anchors. You can remove this template after fixing the problems. |
Reporting errors |
We may not state as a fact that the Shulkhan Arukh is from the Rishonim era. That is only the opinion of some people. Many other Orthodox rabbis note that the Shulkhan Arukh is actually from the era of the Acharonim.
See this analysis. http://www.ottmall.com/mj_ht_arch/v27/mj_v27i48.html#COF
Even more interesting, see this Orthodox conclusion: http://www.ottmall.com/mj_ht_arch/v27/mj_v27i51.html#CPI
Also, Margaliot (Encyclopedia L'Toldot Gedolei Yisrael) brings Rabbi Yosef Karo down as an Acharon, not a Rishon.
Also, it is a Jewish folk-myth that an Acharon cannot disagree with a Rishon. 'In fact, such a position is not a part of Jewish law! We cannot present such positions as facts, when they are merely accepted folkways, not halakhot.
I read this statement in the article, and very soon got completely confused:
"According to Orthodox Jewish tradition, scholars in one era within the history of halachic development do not challenge the rulings of previous-era scholars, and hence Acharonim cannot dispute the rulings of rabbis of previous eras unless they find support from other rabbis of previous eras."
This needs explanation. What are scholars not allowed to challenge? And why? What determines the beginning of period? Even understanding that, as suggested above, this is a folk-myth...explain it! Piano non troppo ( talk) 07:15, 12 October 2008 (UTC)
Will the Acharonim era ever end? If so, when? And what will be the name of the era that succeeds it? FiredanceThroughTheNight ( talk) 19:07, 12 April 2013 (UTC)
Under Josef Chaim and Ben Ish Chai on the bottom. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 100.2.127.140 ( talk) 00:28, 5 February 2015 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Acharonim. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 13:09, 24 December 2017 (UTC)