![]() | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Hey, I think you should think about splitting the List of According to Jim episodes section in the main article. Most TV shows have there own list of episode pages now, so why not this one? Thanks, Mrx9898 23:23, 24 April 2007 (UTC)
Ok, I'm just going to spilt the section into a new article. It's too unogranised. Mrx9898 06:19, 13 June 2007 (UTC)
I know for a fact that I saw a TV interview (on a Extra/Access Hollywood type news show) with Courtney Thorne-Smith before the beginning of the 2006-2007 Season, sometime in December or January, in which she stated that it was the last season of production. She also commented on the uniqueness of this sitcom compared to others and how they have had a good run, doing better than they ever thought they would.
I don't remember specifically when or on what show I saw this interview take place, but I know I saw it and I do know that she confirmed that this season was the end.
The link stating that on May 15th, it was announced it would not be renewed is probably faulty information.
Anyone who can help out by finding a transcript of this interview or information regarding this final season, would be great. -- 71.92.216.176 06:42, 22 May 2007 (UTC)
can we put the german fansite in the article?
in the german wiki are a lot of english links too 85.179.200.109 10:51, 1 July 2007 (UTC)
This has been tagged since December. A Trivia tag is there to encourage the incorporation of information into other parts of the article. This has not occurred since tagging in December, hence the deletion. Simply changing the section name and removing the tag is not the answer nor is it allowed!
Please try to get this info somewhere in the article, but not in its own section! Good luck TINY MARK 19:17, 6 April 2008 (UTC)
On May 15, 2007, it was announced that According to Jim was not renewed for another season. ABC Entertainment President Stephen McPherson said, "We are talking to the studio to see if there’s something financially, a deal that would make sense for us.". [1] On June 27, 2007 ABC renewed the show for a seventh season with 18 episodes. [2] [3]
According to Jim returned to ABC's schedule on Tuesday January 1, 2008 with two episodes at 9 PM and 9:30 PM. After that, the series moved to its regular time slot at 8 PM. Despite the writer's strike, ABC announced that the show will produce all 18 episodes ordered for this season. [4]
On February 27, 2008, It was reported that ABC is close to renewing According to Jim for an eighth season. [5] On May 13 2008, ABC offically renewed the series for an eighth season. [6] —Preceding unsigned comment added by The Arachnid ( talk • contribs) 08:11, 20 May 2008 (UTC)
References
Where does the show take place???? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.80.106.105 ( talk) 14:38, 30 July 2008 (UTC)
"Much like his real life counterpart, Jim's character is noted as a fan of blues music, as well as the Chicago Bears, Chicago Cubs, Chicago Bulls, and the Chicago Blackhawks. Jim & Cheryl, also raise five children – Ruby, Gracie, Kyle, Jonathan and Gordon." Is it just me or is this part awkwardly worded? MrPenguin 2 ( talk) 15:05, 18 May 2009 (UTC)
It is noted that Jim's first and middle names are James Orenthal, while OJ Simpson's name is Orenthal James "O. J." Simpson. Perhaps this is a an intended reference. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 204.236.85.37 ( talk) 22:34, 8 December 2010 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to 2 external links on
According to Jim. Please take a moment to review
my edit. If necessary, add {{
cbignore}}
after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{
nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}}
to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.
An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.
Cheers. — cyberbot II Talk to my owner:Online 00:39, 17 October 2015 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to 3 external links on
According to Jim. Please take a moment to review
my edit. If necessary, add {{
cbignore}}
after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{
nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}}
to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.
An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.
Cheers.— cyberbot II Talk to my owner:Online 20:39, 4 January 2016 (UTC)
TV series articles should generally follow the section order laid out in MOS:TV, unless there is an overwhelmingly compelling reason (and consensus) to do so – there is no such reason at this article, so MOS:TV should simply be followed. -- IJBall ( contribs • talk) 02:24, 2 May 2020 (UTC)
Note that there is no requirement that 'Awards and nominations' tables be organized by "award giver", and organizing these tables "by year" is perfectly acceptable and may in fact be preferable. While the latter is my preference as the format, I am not going to revert the recent change in format to the former in this article table in the spirit of not furthering conflict over the editing here. But I am noting that this change was made on the talk page, and indicating my preference for the former table format in case anyone else agrees or wishes to comment on the change. -- IJBall ( contribs • talk) 02:51, 30 May 2020 (UTC)
@
CYAce01: You seem to not understand my point – we order them in the table as to their order of appearance when they are first promoted to main cast. IOW, when they are promoted to front credits, as per
WP:TVCAST (please read the whole paragraph starting with "The cast listing should be ordered according to the original broadcast credits..."
, including the "note"). As per the table table, that didn't happen for Rouse and Rayburn until season #5. How they are credited, or even when they first appear in season #4, when they were not main cast, has no bearing on this.
So, I will ask again – what is the credit ordering in episode #5.1, when both Rouse and Rayburn were actually promoted to the full main cast? -- IJBall ( contribs • talk) 02:56, 24 December 2022 (UTC)
![]() | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Hey, I think you should think about splitting the List of According to Jim episodes section in the main article. Most TV shows have there own list of episode pages now, so why not this one? Thanks, Mrx9898 23:23, 24 April 2007 (UTC)
Ok, I'm just going to spilt the section into a new article. It's too unogranised. Mrx9898 06:19, 13 June 2007 (UTC)
I know for a fact that I saw a TV interview (on a Extra/Access Hollywood type news show) with Courtney Thorne-Smith before the beginning of the 2006-2007 Season, sometime in December or January, in which she stated that it was the last season of production. She also commented on the uniqueness of this sitcom compared to others and how they have had a good run, doing better than they ever thought they would.
I don't remember specifically when or on what show I saw this interview take place, but I know I saw it and I do know that she confirmed that this season was the end.
The link stating that on May 15th, it was announced it would not be renewed is probably faulty information.
Anyone who can help out by finding a transcript of this interview or information regarding this final season, would be great. -- 71.92.216.176 06:42, 22 May 2007 (UTC)
can we put the german fansite in the article?
in the german wiki are a lot of english links too 85.179.200.109 10:51, 1 July 2007 (UTC)
This has been tagged since December. A Trivia tag is there to encourage the incorporation of information into other parts of the article. This has not occurred since tagging in December, hence the deletion. Simply changing the section name and removing the tag is not the answer nor is it allowed!
Please try to get this info somewhere in the article, but not in its own section! Good luck TINY MARK 19:17, 6 April 2008 (UTC)
On May 15, 2007, it was announced that According to Jim was not renewed for another season. ABC Entertainment President Stephen McPherson said, "We are talking to the studio to see if there’s something financially, a deal that would make sense for us.". [1] On June 27, 2007 ABC renewed the show for a seventh season with 18 episodes. [2] [3]
According to Jim returned to ABC's schedule on Tuesday January 1, 2008 with two episodes at 9 PM and 9:30 PM. After that, the series moved to its regular time slot at 8 PM. Despite the writer's strike, ABC announced that the show will produce all 18 episodes ordered for this season. [4]
On February 27, 2008, It was reported that ABC is close to renewing According to Jim for an eighth season. [5] On May 13 2008, ABC offically renewed the series for an eighth season. [6] —Preceding unsigned comment added by The Arachnid ( talk • contribs) 08:11, 20 May 2008 (UTC)
References
Where does the show take place???? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.80.106.105 ( talk) 14:38, 30 July 2008 (UTC)
"Much like his real life counterpart, Jim's character is noted as a fan of blues music, as well as the Chicago Bears, Chicago Cubs, Chicago Bulls, and the Chicago Blackhawks. Jim & Cheryl, also raise five children – Ruby, Gracie, Kyle, Jonathan and Gordon." Is it just me or is this part awkwardly worded? MrPenguin 2 ( talk) 15:05, 18 May 2009 (UTC)
It is noted that Jim's first and middle names are James Orenthal, while OJ Simpson's name is Orenthal James "O. J." Simpson. Perhaps this is a an intended reference. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 204.236.85.37 ( talk) 22:34, 8 December 2010 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to 2 external links on
According to Jim. Please take a moment to review
my edit. If necessary, add {{
cbignore}}
after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{
nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}}
to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.
An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.
Cheers. — cyberbot II Talk to my owner:Online 00:39, 17 October 2015 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to 3 external links on
According to Jim. Please take a moment to review
my edit. If necessary, add {{
cbignore}}
after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{
nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}}
to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.
An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.
Cheers.— cyberbot II Talk to my owner:Online 20:39, 4 January 2016 (UTC)
TV series articles should generally follow the section order laid out in MOS:TV, unless there is an overwhelmingly compelling reason (and consensus) to do so – there is no such reason at this article, so MOS:TV should simply be followed. -- IJBall ( contribs • talk) 02:24, 2 May 2020 (UTC)
Note that there is no requirement that 'Awards and nominations' tables be organized by "award giver", and organizing these tables "by year" is perfectly acceptable and may in fact be preferable. While the latter is my preference as the format, I am not going to revert the recent change in format to the former in this article table in the spirit of not furthering conflict over the editing here. But I am noting that this change was made on the talk page, and indicating my preference for the former table format in case anyone else agrees or wishes to comment on the change. -- IJBall ( contribs • talk) 02:51, 30 May 2020 (UTC)
@
CYAce01: You seem to not understand my point – we order them in the table as to their order of appearance when they are first promoted to main cast. IOW, when they are promoted to front credits, as per
WP:TVCAST (please read the whole paragraph starting with "The cast listing should be ordered according to the original broadcast credits..."
, including the "note"). As per the table table, that didn't happen for Rouse and Rayburn until season #5. How they are credited, or even when they first appear in season #4, when they were not main cast, has no bearing on this.
So, I will ask again – what is the credit ordering in episode #5.1, when both Rouse and Rayburn were actually promoted to the full main cast? -- IJBall ( contribs • talk) 02:56, 24 December 2022 (UTC)