This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
g
This was obviously written by the company which makes the software. It reads like an advertisement and contains unnecessary details. 96.236.197.120 ( talk) 12:25, 18 September 2011 (UTC)
Of course the company edits it... — Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.177.128.131 ( talk) 16:44, 18 May 2012 (UTC)
How is Google Books relevant? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Robotwisdom ( talk • contribs) 10:30, 14 September 2011 (UTC)
The author's point was that even though Accelerated Reader offers a large number of quiz titles, the number of available quizzes is dwarfed by the entire corpus of books in existence. I agree, it's not completely relevant...obviously the portion of the total corpus of books that gradeschoolers would even consider reading is no where near the total number of books ever written. The person who put that in is a critic of the product. Take if for what it's worth. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.177.128.131 ( talk) 16:49, 18 May 2012 (UTC)
Teacher pet Antonicia ( talk) 21:41, 18 September 2017 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 14 external links on Accelerated Reader. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
{{
dead link}}
tag to
http://research.renlearn.com/research/pdfs/56.aspWhen you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{
Sourcecheck}}
).
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 06:36, 3 October 2016 (UTC)
Two orphan cubs Pistubbee ( talk) 00:42, 29 July 2017 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on Accelerated Reader. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 21:09, 25 June 2017 (UTC)
Hi 2603:6010:F101:AECF:AC92:327D:7FDE:10C2 ( talk) 19:35, 31 August 2022 (UTC)
Hi 2603:6010:F101:AECF:AC92:327D:7FDE:10C2 ( talk) 19:35, 31 August 2022 (UTC)
I'm sorry, but the state of this article is a mess. The whole article is just a promotion for the subject, and the criticism section is just an essay trying to prove a researcher's criticism. Also, most if not all of the citations are improper. This can be classified as patent nonsense and should be speedily deleted, if not rewritten. Please help improve this article. Also some of the citations are self published by the company or its parent company, Renaissance Learning, thus making these sources unreliable, and they must be deleted.
Sincerely, Thenewright22 ( talk) 12:14, 13 October 2022 (UTC)
Knhhu 178.251.182.137 ( talk) 22:27, 27 November 2022 (UTC)
I remember taking Accelerated Reader tests in 1994. It must have been released before then. It was a completely text-based program that ran on MS-DOS at that time. Ben Boldt 03:34, 13 September 2023 (UTC)
This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
g
This was obviously written by the company which makes the software. It reads like an advertisement and contains unnecessary details. 96.236.197.120 ( talk) 12:25, 18 September 2011 (UTC)
Of course the company edits it... — Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.177.128.131 ( talk) 16:44, 18 May 2012 (UTC)
How is Google Books relevant? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Robotwisdom ( talk • contribs) 10:30, 14 September 2011 (UTC)
The author's point was that even though Accelerated Reader offers a large number of quiz titles, the number of available quizzes is dwarfed by the entire corpus of books in existence. I agree, it's not completely relevant...obviously the portion of the total corpus of books that gradeschoolers would even consider reading is no where near the total number of books ever written. The person who put that in is a critic of the product. Take if for what it's worth. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.177.128.131 ( talk) 16:49, 18 May 2012 (UTC)
Teacher pet Antonicia ( talk) 21:41, 18 September 2017 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 14 external links on Accelerated Reader. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
{{
dead link}}
tag to
http://research.renlearn.com/research/pdfs/56.aspWhen you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{
Sourcecheck}}
).
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 06:36, 3 October 2016 (UTC)
Two orphan cubs Pistubbee ( talk) 00:42, 29 July 2017 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on Accelerated Reader. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 21:09, 25 June 2017 (UTC)
Hi 2603:6010:F101:AECF:AC92:327D:7FDE:10C2 ( talk) 19:35, 31 August 2022 (UTC)
Hi 2603:6010:F101:AECF:AC92:327D:7FDE:10C2 ( talk) 19:35, 31 August 2022 (UTC)
I'm sorry, but the state of this article is a mess. The whole article is just a promotion for the subject, and the criticism section is just an essay trying to prove a researcher's criticism. Also, most if not all of the citations are improper. This can be classified as patent nonsense and should be speedily deleted, if not rewritten. Please help improve this article. Also some of the citations are self published by the company or its parent company, Renaissance Learning, thus making these sources unreliable, and they must be deleted.
Sincerely, Thenewright22 ( talk) 12:14, 13 October 2022 (UTC)
Knhhu 178.251.182.137 ( talk) 22:27, 27 November 2022 (UTC)
I remember taking Accelerated Reader tests in 1994. It must have been released before then. It was a completely text-based program that ran on MS-DOS at that time. Ben Boldt 03:34, 13 September 2023 (UTC)