From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Ecumenism categories

@ Dahn: Regarding this revert, this biography is all about politics and nothing about religious beliefs. What is Aaron the Tyrant's contribution to ecumenism? Marcocapelle ( talk) 06:18, 20 August 2019 (UTC) reply

  • @ Marcocapelle: That's not actually true: search the text for "Primacy of Peter", and read around it. I'll admit it's not a terribly impressive contribution, but categories should be inclusive of minor topics, not just "major contributions" or whatnot, as they give readers a chance to probe into the history of a topic. I think we should slowly move to a subcat along the lines of "Catholic-Orthodox union attempts before the [whatever moment is defining for all Eastern Catholics]" (which would also group Eastern Catholics avant la lettre). But for now, this will do. Dahn ( talk) 06:27, 20 August 2019 (UTC) reply
  • Recognizing the Primacy of Peter is a tad more than just politics. Also: did Richelieu obtain recognition of Catholic doctrines from said Protestants? Cause if he did, then yes, they would belong as well. See my point? Dahn ( talk) 06:34, 20 August 2019 (UTC) reply
  • This aside from the fact that Catholics and Orthodox are not divided along the same lines as Catholics and Protestants are -- which is why the Eastern Catholic churches are now a thing. See for instance Udriște Năsturel, who used Jesuit propaganda against the Protestants while remaining fully Orthodox. Dahn ( talk) 06:37, 20 August 2019 (UTC) reply

The first sentence

The first sentence is unreadable. I highly suggest all or most of these alternate names/spellings be moved into a footnote. The use of {{ efn}} is advisable. Aza24 (talk) 16:57, 20 June 2024 (UTC) reply

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Ecumenism categories

@ Dahn: Regarding this revert, this biography is all about politics and nothing about religious beliefs. What is Aaron the Tyrant's contribution to ecumenism? Marcocapelle ( talk) 06:18, 20 August 2019 (UTC) reply

  • @ Marcocapelle: That's not actually true: search the text for "Primacy of Peter", and read around it. I'll admit it's not a terribly impressive contribution, but categories should be inclusive of minor topics, not just "major contributions" or whatnot, as they give readers a chance to probe into the history of a topic. I think we should slowly move to a subcat along the lines of "Catholic-Orthodox union attempts before the [whatever moment is defining for all Eastern Catholics]" (which would also group Eastern Catholics avant la lettre). But for now, this will do. Dahn ( talk) 06:27, 20 August 2019 (UTC) reply
  • Recognizing the Primacy of Peter is a tad more than just politics. Also: did Richelieu obtain recognition of Catholic doctrines from said Protestants? Cause if he did, then yes, they would belong as well. See my point? Dahn ( talk) 06:34, 20 August 2019 (UTC) reply
  • This aside from the fact that Catholics and Orthodox are not divided along the same lines as Catholics and Protestants are -- which is why the Eastern Catholic churches are now a thing. See for instance Udriște Năsturel, who used Jesuit propaganda against the Protestants while remaining fully Orthodox. Dahn ( talk) 06:37, 20 August 2019 (UTC) reply

The first sentence

The first sentence is unreadable. I highly suggest all or most of these alternate names/spellings be moved into a footnote. The use of {{ efn}} is advisable. Aza24 (talk) 16:57, 20 June 2024 (UTC) reply


Videos

Youtube | Vimeo | Bing

Websites

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Encyclopedia

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Facebook