![]() | This page is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
"This new grouping acted as a prerequisite for the planned East Asia Community, which was supposedly patterned after the now-defunct European Community"
As far as I know the EC is not defunct, I believe the term "now-defunct" should be removed... (May, 10th 2009)
CONSOCIATIO NATIONIS AUSTERORIENTALIS ASIANUS - Delfindakila ( talk) 16:09, 9 March 2009 (UTC)
I noticed that there are a lot of quotation here. If it is possible, state the source. Else, the quote should be removed. __earth 10:25, Dec 1, 2004 (UTC)
The article on Brunei is currently listed to be improved on Wikipedia: This week's improvement drive. You can support the nomination with your vote there. -- Fenice 06:36, 6 August 2005 (UTC)
I've seen no evidence that Timor-Leste is an observer. Source? If none is given, I'll remove the alleged fact.
ナイトスタリオン
✉
13:57, 8 December 2005 (UTC)
I think Timor-Leste should be included as a future member. - Isao
East Timor IS a member of ASEAN.
Joshywawa (
talk)
12:13, 22 August 2008 (UTC)
There were three aims of ASEAN:
- To promote social, economic and cultural developement in the region - To protect the peace and stability in the region - To allow the members to discuss differences peacefully.
I edited the main text, they only listed two - the first two. Joshywawa ( talk) 12:21, 22 August 2008 (UTC)
--- EU, North American Security and Prosperity Partnership and now this? NWO, anybody? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 99.226.181.51 ( talk) 04:27, 21 December 2008 (UTC)
The word has been deleted since it has no relevance.
Perhaps this article should be listed as ASEAN by default rather than the more wordy current version, in line with other organisations such as NATO. Jsteph 04:37, 14 January 2007 (UTC)
I have nominated this article for GA on WP:GAC, and will be due for a review. You can check up on it, if you wish. Ariedartin JECJY Talk 12:04, 28 January 2007 (UTC)
Wow, more than a month before a review, we really need more help with the backlog. I am going to put the article on hold for now until several items are fixed according to the GA criteria.
Fix these suggestions:
Add inline citations:
The article looks pretty good so far but the above suggestions should be fixed before I'll pass it. You have seven days to do so, and if they are not fixed I'll have to fail it. Let me know when you finish these or if you have any questions on my talk page. -- Nehrams2020 09:08, 3 March 2007 (UTC)
Being "wordy" isn't a reason for moving this, unless the org has officially renamed itself into "ASEAN," with "ASEAN" not meaning anything. -- Howard the Duck 09:14, 8 March 2007 (UTC)
I was redirected to ASEAN from ASEAN Regional Forum ? The Current (8 March 2007) version of World Fact Book has the USA as a member of ASRF which I guess is the ASEAN Regional Forum featured here in wikipedia as a non article with a redirect attached. Just from what I read here it looks like there ought to be an actual article not a redirect, as just looking at the US history in that neighborhood....there is stuff to say, and maybe at least a bit of history? this post was contibuted by User:John5Russell3Finley
I have passed the article according to the GA criteria. Everything is well-sourced and is broad in coverage. If possible, continue to expand as new information appears, making sure to always source it. Just a quick note, for the statement "Consequently, the fourth meeting was held in Singapore in 1992 where the leaders again agreed to meet more frequently every three years." change the last part of it to "meet more frequently, deciding to get together every three years" or something like it. Otherwise it sounds like every three years they meet, they're going to decide to meet even more frequently and so on. That would soon be quite a bit of meetings! Anyway, good job, and if you have the time, consider helping with the GAC backlog and reviewing an article or two. Keep up the good work on improving the articles within Wikipedia! -- Nehrams2020 21:00, 10 March 2007 (UTC)
Great work folks! __earth ( Talk) 13:22, 11 March 2007 (UTC)
I am deleting a whole paragraph from the CRITICISM section:
"During the 12th ASEAN Summit in Cebu, several militant groups staged anti-globalization and anti-Arroyo rallies.[42] Accoding to the militants, the agenda of economic integration would negatively affect industries in the Philippines and would cause thousands of Filipinos to lose their jobs.[43] They also viewed the organization as "imperialistic" that threatens the country's sovereignty.[43] A human rights lawyer from New Zealand was also present to protest about the human rights situation in the region in general."
The reason for the removal is because it singles out one nation out of the 9 member organization. Also, not only does it single out one nation it deliberately condone President Arroyo does making a political statement and it criticizes her administration for Human Right's violation; thus, making the whole paragraph aggressively political and very opinionated namely against Arroyo.
If the original author wants to criticize then he or she better lay out every member's dirty laundries not just single out one country. Or the author can write a more extensive essay about the failings and criticism against the ASEAN organization, as a whole not just one: from trade talks, political maneuverings, to the other matters.
Dear User:ZwickauDeluxe, concerning your edit that removes the sentences on Australia applying for membership, the Bloomberg article states that Australia plans to apply for permanent membership of ASEAN. It is not right to remove a footnoted sentence off the article, especially so when the source is reputable. __earth ( Talk) 04:27, 9 June 2007 (UTC)
"As a display of solidarity against communist expansion in Vietnam and insurgency within their own borders" This is not a fact, nor is it supported by any concrete citation. I have read through some major documents of ASEAN, and have not found anything like this. Should we reconsider it? Hawkie 13:47, 31 July 2007 (UTC)
I love the many maps showing who is part of ASEAN+3 and so forth, but I really think the first map is not very helpful in clearly seeing who the member states of ASEAN are. Instead of a global map, couldn't someone use a map of Southeast Asia/all of Asia, which would make it much easier to see the member states (especially ones like Singapore)?? Nicolasdz 09:31, 21 August 2007 (UTC)
The exact same map appears twice in the article showing" ASEAN full members ██ ASEAN observers ██ ASEAN candidate members ██ ASEAN Plus Three ███ East Asia Summit ██████ ASEAN Regional Forum
Seems quite redundant, doesn't it? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 162.95.216.225 ( talk) 16:46, 16 December 2008 (UTC)
I've done a bit of browsing, and I found a few publications in which material on ASEAN can be found and be very, very useful:
These contain quite a bit of content and perspectives on ASEAN and also a lot on its history - something we direly need to add into the article. Unfortunately, due to exams being much less than a month away, I have no time myself to obtain these books. Anyone eager for the challenge? Ariedartin JECJY Talk 11:14, 4 September 2007 (UTC)
The entire country of India is missing (appears as white) on two of the maps.
There are 4 instances of global maps being used (2 of which are the same) but all of them have deleted India. This is very odd. Did nobody notice a huge white gap when they uploaded the picture? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 131.111.213.41 ( talk) 08:59, 19 May 2008 (UTC)
It appears that the changes to teh maps were made in two edits on 27 April 2008 at 18:20 and 18:48. Is there any reason why we can't simply revert to the previously used images (which included India)? I have asked before doing so in case there was a problem with the old images Eas21c ( talk) 10:46, 20 May 2008 (UTC)
The image Image:Asean-para2.png is used in this article under a claim of fair use, but it does not have an adequate explanation for why it meets the requirements for such images when used here. In particular, for each page the image is used on, it must have an explanation linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page. Please check
The following images also have this problem:
This is an automated notice by FairuseBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. -- 22:24, 9 May 2008 (UTC)
Aren't they basically the same language? Why are they listed alongside each other as "official languages"? Colipon+( T) 04:56, 27 May 2008 (UTC)
The difference between dark blue and lighter blue countries is difficult to tell in this map.-- dunnhaupt ( talk) 22:23, 26 November 2008 (UTC)
Cant a template be made for: {{Life in ASEAN}}-- Briaboru ( talk) 15:43, 18 December 2008 (UTC)
I'm familiar with the pronunciation /ˈæzi.ɑːn/. I don't think I've ever heard /ˈɑːsi.ɑːn/. Can anyone confirm? 121.73.181.118 ( talk) 11:21, 19 December 2008 (UTC)
ASEAN was listed as a Good Article in March of 2007.
However, currently two sections of the article have been tagged "This section does not cite any references or sources" since May 2008, and another section since September 2008.
We should cite or remove this material. If we don't, we should de-list this article from status as a Good Article. -- 201.37.230.43 ( talk) 16:50, 12 April 2009 (UTC)
This article is being reassessed as part of the GA Sweeps project. I have found the article to not meet the GA Criteria, and as such is in danger of being delisted from GA status. My review is here. I will hold the article for one week and will reassess then. I will notify the interested projects and primary editor with the hope that work can be done to keep the article. H1nkles ( talk) 21:18, 1 June 2009 (UTC)
July 21, 1994 or July 28, 1995. One is mentioned in this article and the other is mentioned in List of ASEAN member states —Preceding unsigned comment added by 113.22.165.108 ( talk) 03:11, 23 August 2009 (UTC)
East Timor is not a member but is coloured in on the map. Well the boarder is not even there, it shows East Timor as being a part of Indonesia. This has not been so since 2001. Can someone sort out the map please. I am unable to edit SVG maps that well. IJA ( talk) 14:19, 24 October 2009 (UTC)
Would someone include the names of all the Secretaries inside the table of the formal summits next to their respective nation. That way we know who is the Chair in the past rotation. Thanks. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Rit99 ( talk • contribs) 19:02, 27 July 2010 (UTC)
Why is French Guiana (in northeast South America) colored orange as a member of the ASEAN Regional Forum in the map in the Regional Forum section? It is definitely not a member. This map should be updated to correct that. Resplin.odell ( talk) 15:28, 25 January 2011 (UTC)
![]() |
An image used in this article,
File:Emblem of ASEAN.svg, has been nominated for speedy deletion at
Wikimedia Commons for the following reason: Copyright violations
|
Speedy deletions at commons tend to take longer than they do on Wikipedia, so there is no rush to respond. If you feel the deletion can be contested then please do so (
commons:COM:SPEEDY has further information). Otherwise consider finding a replacement image before deletion occurs.
A further notification will be placed when/if the image is deleted. This notification is provided by a Bot, currently under trial -- CommonsNotificationBot ( talk) 04:07, 18 May 2011 (UTC) |
![]() |
An image used in this article,
File:The Flag of ASEAN.svg, has been nominated for speedy deletion at
Wikimedia Commons for the following reason: Copyright violations
|
Speedy deletions at commons tend to take longer than they do on Wikipedia, so there is no rush to respond. If you feel the deletion can be contested then please do so (
commons:COM:SPEEDY has further information). Otherwise consider finding a replacement image before deletion occurs.
A further notification will be placed when/if the image is deleted. This notification is provided by a Bot, currently under trial -- CommonsNotificationBot ( talk) 04:11, 18 May 2011 (UTC) |
During several automated bot runs the following external link was found to be unavailable. Please check if the link is in fact down and fix or remove it in that case!
-- JeffGBot ( talk) 01:00, 20 June 2011 (UTC)
During several automated bot runs the following external link was found to be unavailable. Please check if the link is in fact down and fix or remove it in that case!
-- JeffGBot ( talk) 01:01, 20 June 2011 (UTC)
During several automated bot runs the following external link was found to be unavailable. Please check if the link is in fact down and fix or remove it in that case!
-- JeffGBot ( talk) 01:01, 20 June 2011 (UTC)
The result of the move request was: page moved. Vegaswikian ( talk) 20:40, 20 November 2011 (UTC)
ASEAN →
Association of Southeast Asian Nations – Relisted.
Vegaswikian (
talk) 00:20, 14 November 2011 (UTC) I would like to request that this page be moved back to "Association of Southeast Asian Nations". In November 2008, user
23prootie moved the article to ASEAN on the grounds that it's commonly used to the extent that ASEAN is now a "real word". While this may be the case in the Philippines to a certain extent (where the acronym ASEAN is used rather than its official name in English or even the name in Filipino), I'm doubtful that this is necessarily the case in other member countries. In addition, per
WP:ACRONYMTITLE, unless the subject is known exclusively by its acronym (which it is not), an article's title should not be abbreviated into its acronym. Similarly, other "ASEAN-like" organizations are not titled by their acronyms, and so for the sake of consistency, the article should be moved back to its full name. --
Sky Harbor (
talk)
12:31, 7 November 2011 (UTC)
In the section The ASEAN way, there is an outdated and therefore misleading quote that states that "no tension has escalated into armed confrontation among ASEAN member countries". Given that we have a page on the Cambodian–Thai border dispute and that dispute is ongoing and violent, should the quote be removed or a reference to this conflict added? Bern1005 ( talk) 12:03, 16 July 2012 (UTC)
GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Reviewer: Aircorn ( talk · contribs) 03:45, 30 November 2012 (UTC)
Fail I am sorry, but this was nominated with outstanding cleanup tags. I counted at least 9. According to the toolserver (may not be visible after it is failed) it has the following issues: Articles with dead external links (August 2011, August 2012, September 2010), Articles with unsourced statements (July 2012, June 2009, October 2012, September 2008), Articles with specifically marked weasel-worded phrases (July 2012), Articles with obsolete information (November 2012) These issues should be sorted out before nominating. Once they are fixed feel free to renominate. AIRcorn (talk) 03:45, 30 November 2012 (UTC)
The article states that were it a single entity, ASEAN would be the 10th largest economy in the world. It then goes on to list the 12 nations that would have larger economies... Shinigami27 ( talk) 01:14, 21 January 2013 (UTC)
Country | NUTS 1 | NUTS 2 | NUTS 2 | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
English | National | English | National | English | National | ||
Brunei | - | - | District | Daerah | Mukim | Mukim | |
Cambodia | Province | Khaet | District | Srouk | City and Village | Krong and Phum | |
Indonesia | Province | Provinsi | District | Distrik | City and Regency | Kota dan Kabupaten | |
Laos | Province | Khoueng | District | Muang | City and Village | ? and Baan | |
Malaysia | State and Federal territory | Negeri dan Wilayah Persekutuan | District | Daerah | City and Village | Bandaraya dan ? | |
Myanmar | State and Region | District | City and Township | ||||
Philippines | Province | Lalawigan | Region | Rehiyon | City and Municipality | Bayan | |
Singapore | - | - | Region | Town | |||
Thailand | Province | Changwat | District | Amphoe | City and Village | ||
Vietnam | Province | Tỉnh | District | Huyện | City and Municipality | Thành and ? |
![]() | This page is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
"This new grouping acted as a prerequisite for the planned East Asia Community, which was supposedly patterned after the now-defunct European Community"
As far as I know the EC is not defunct, I believe the term "now-defunct" should be removed... (May, 10th 2009)
CONSOCIATIO NATIONIS AUSTERORIENTALIS ASIANUS - Delfindakila ( talk) 16:09, 9 March 2009 (UTC)
I noticed that there are a lot of quotation here. If it is possible, state the source. Else, the quote should be removed. __earth 10:25, Dec 1, 2004 (UTC)
The article on Brunei is currently listed to be improved on Wikipedia: This week's improvement drive. You can support the nomination with your vote there. -- Fenice 06:36, 6 August 2005 (UTC)
I've seen no evidence that Timor-Leste is an observer. Source? If none is given, I'll remove the alleged fact.
ナイトスタリオン
✉
13:57, 8 December 2005 (UTC)
I think Timor-Leste should be included as a future member. - Isao
East Timor IS a member of ASEAN.
Joshywawa (
talk)
12:13, 22 August 2008 (UTC)
There were three aims of ASEAN:
- To promote social, economic and cultural developement in the region - To protect the peace and stability in the region - To allow the members to discuss differences peacefully.
I edited the main text, they only listed two - the first two. Joshywawa ( talk) 12:21, 22 August 2008 (UTC)
--- EU, North American Security and Prosperity Partnership and now this? NWO, anybody? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 99.226.181.51 ( talk) 04:27, 21 December 2008 (UTC)
The word has been deleted since it has no relevance.
Perhaps this article should be listed as ASEAN by default rather than the more wordy current version, in line with other organisations such as NATO. Jsteph 04:37, 14 January 2007 (UTC)
I have nominated this article for GA on WP:GAC, and will be due for a review. You can check up on it, if you wish. Ariedartin JECJY Talk 12:04, 28 January 2007 (UTC)
Wow, more than a month before a review, we really need more help with the backlog. I am going to put the article on hold for now until several items are fixed according to the GA criteria.
Fix these suggestions:
Add inline citations:
The article looks pretty good so far but the above suggestions should be fixed before I'll pass it. You have seven days to do so, and if they are not fixed I'll have to fail it. Let me know when you finish these or if you have any questions on my talk page. -- Nehrams2020 09:08, 3 March 2007 (UTC)
Being "wordy" isn't a reason for moving this, unless the org has officially renamed itself into "ASEAN," with "ASEAN" not meaning anything. -- Howard the Duck 09:14, 8 March 2007 (UTC)
I was redirected to ASEAN from ASEAN Regional Forum ? The Current (8 March 2007) version of World Fact Book has the USA as a member of ASRF which I guess is the ASEAN Regional Forum featured here in wikipedia as a non article with a redirect attached. Just from what I read here it looks like there ought to be an actual article not a redirect, as just looking at the US history in that neighborhood....there is stuff to say, and maybe at least a bit of history? this post was contibuted by User:John5Russell3Finley
I have passed the article according to the GA criteria. Everything is well-sourced and is broad in coverage. If possible, continue to expand as new information appears, making sure to always source it. Just a quick note, for the statement "Consequently, the fourth meeting was held in Singapore in 1992 where the leaders again agreed to meet more frequently every three years." change the last part of it to "meet more frequently, deciding to get together every three years" or something like it. Otherwise it sounds like every three years they meet, they're going to decide to meet even more frequently and so on. That would soon be quite a bit of meetings! Anyway, good job, and if you have the time, consider helping with the GAC backlog and reviewing an article or two. Keep up the good work on improving the articles within Wikipedia! -- Nehrams2020 21:00, 10 March 2007 (UTC)
Great work folks! __earth ( Talk) 13:22, 11 March 2007 (UTC)
I am deleting a whole paragraph from the CRITICISM section:
"During the 12th ASEAN Summit in Cebu, several militant groups staged anti-globalization and anti-Arroyo rallies.[42] Accoding to the militants, the agenda of economic integration would negatively affect industries in the Philippines and would cause thousands of Filipinos to lose their jobs.[43] They also viewed the organization as "imperialistic" that threatens the country's sovereignty.[43] A human rights lawyer from New Zealand was also present to protest about the human rights situation in the region in general."
The reason for the removal is because it singles out one nation out of the 9 member organization. Also, not only does it single out one nation it deliberately condone President Arroyo does making a political statement and it criticizes her administration for Human Right's violation; thus, making the whole paragraph aggressively political and very opinionated namely against Arroyo.
If the original author wants to criticize then he or she better lay out every member's dirty laundries not just single out one country. Or the author can write a more extensive essay about the failings and criticism against the ASEAN organization, as a whole not just one: from trade talks, political maneuverings, to the other matters.
Dear User:ZwickauDeluxe, concerning your edit that removes the sentences on Australia applying for membership, the Bloomberg article states that Australia plans to apply for permanent membership of ASEAN. It is not right to remove a footnoted sentence off the article, especially so when the source is reputable. __earth ( Talk) 04:27, 9 June 2007 (UTC)
"As a display of solidarity against communist expansion in Vietnam and insurgency within their own borders" This is not a fact, nor is it supported by any concrete citation. I have read through some major documents of ASEAN, and have not found anything like this. Should we reconsider it? Hawkie 13:47, 31 July 2007 (UTC)
I love the many maps showing who is part of ASEAN+3 and so forth, but I really think the first map is not very helpful in clearly seeing who the member states of ASEAN are. Instead of a global map, couldn't someone use a map of Southeast Asia/all of Asia, which would make it much easier to see the member states (especially ones like Singapore)?? Nicolasdz 09:31, 21 August 2007 (UTC)
The exact same map appears twice in the article showing" ASEAN full members ██ ASEAN observers ██ ASEAN candidate members ██ ASEAN Plus Three ███ East Asia Summit ██████ ASEAN Regional Forum
Seems quite redundant, doesn't it? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 162.95.216.225 ( talk) 16:46, 16 December 2008 (UTC)
I've done a bit of browsing, and I found a few publications in which material on ASEAN can be found and be very, very useful:
These contain quite a bit of content and perspectives on ASEAN and also a lot on its history - something we direly need to add into the article. Unfortunately, due to exams being much less than a month away, I have no time myself to obtain these books. Anyone eager for the challenge? Ariedartin JECJY Talk 11:14, 4 September 2007 (UTC)
The entire country of India is missing (appears as white) on two of the maps.
There are 4 instances of global maps being used (2 of which are the same) but all of them have deleted India. This is very odd. Did nobody notice a huge white gap when they uploaded the picture? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 131.111.213.41 ( talk) 08:59, 19 May 2008 (UTC)
It appears that the changes to teh maps were made in two edits on 27 April 2008 at 18:20 and 18:48. Is there any reason why we can't simply revert to the previously used images (which included India)? I have asked before doing so in case there was a problem with the old images Eas21c ( talk) 10:46, 20 May 2008 (UTC)
The image Image:Asean-para2.png is used in this article under a claim of fair use, but it does not have an adequate explanation for why it meets the requirements for such images when used here. In particular, for each page the image is used on, it must have an explanation linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page. Please check
The following images also have this problem:
This is an automated notice by FairuseBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. -- 22:24, 9 May 2008 (UTC)
Aren't they basically the same language? Why are they listed alongside each other as "official languages"? Colipon+( T) 04:56, 27 May 2008 (UTC)
The difference between dark blue and lighter blue countries is difficult to tell in this map.-- dunnhaupt ( talk) 22:23, 26 November 2008 (UTC)
Cant a template be made for: {{Life in ASEAN}}-- Briaboru ( talk) 15:43, 18 December 2008 (UTC)
I'm familiar with the pronunciation /ˈæzi.ɑːn/. I don't think I've ever heard /ˈɑːsi.ɑːn/. Can anyone confirm? 121.73.181.118 ( talk) 11:21, 19 December 2008 (UTC)
ASEAN was listed as a Good Article in March of 2007.
However, currently two sections of the article have been tagged "This section does not cite any references or sources" since May 2008, and another section since September 2008.
We should cite or remove this material. If we don't, we should de-list this article from status as a Good Article. -- 201.37.230.43 ( talk) 16:50, 12 April 2009 (UTC)
This article is being reassessed as part of the GA Sweeps project. I have found the article to not meet the GA Criteria, and as such is in danger of being delisted from GA status. My review is here. I will hold the article for one week and will reassess then. I will notify the interested projects and primary editor with the hope that work can be done to keep the article. H1nkles ( talk) 21:18, 1 June 2009 (UTC)
July 21, 1994 or July 28, 1995. One is mentioned in this article and the other is mentioned in List of ASEAN member states —Preceding unsigned comment added by 113.22.165.108 ( talk) 03:11, 23 August 2009 (UTC)
East Timor is not a member but is coloured in on the map. Well the boarder is not even there, it shows East Timor as being a part of Indonesia. This has not been so since 2001. Can someone sort out the map please. I am unable to edit SVG maps that well. IJA ( talk) 14:19, 24 October 2009 (UTC)
Would someone include the names of all the Secretaries inside the table of the formal summits next to their respective nation. That way we know who is the Chair in the past rotation. Thanks. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Rit99 ( talk • contribs) 19:02, 27 July 2010 (UTC)
Why is French Guiana (in northeast South America) colored orange as a member of the ASEAN Regional Forum in the map in the Regional Forum section? It is definitely not a member. This map should be updated to correct that. Resplin.odell ( talk) 15:28, 25 January 2011 (UTC)
![]() |
An image used in this article,
File:Emblem of ASEAN.svg, has been nominated for speedy deletion at
Wikimedia Commons for the following reason: Copyright violations
|
Speedy deletions at commons tend to take longer than they do on Wikipedia, so there is no rush to respond. If you feel the deletion can be contested then please do so (
commons:COM:SPEEDY has further information). Otherwise consider finding a replacement image before deletion occurs.
A further notification will be placed when/if the image is deleted. This notification is provided by a Bot, currently under trial -- CommonsNotificationBot ( talk) 04:07, 18 May 2011 (UTC) |
![]() |
An image used in this article,
File:The Flag of ASEAN.svg, has been nominated for speedy deletion at
Wikimedia Commons for the following reason: Copyright violations
|
Speedy deletions at commons tend to take longer than they do on Wikipedia, so there is no rush to respond. If you feel the deletion can be contested then please do so (
commons:COM:SPEEDY has further information). Otherwise consider finding a replacement image before deletion occurs.
A further notification will be placed when/if the image is deleted. This notification is provided by a Bot, currently under trial -- CommonsNotificationBot ( talk) 04:11, 18 May 2011 (UTC) |
During several automated bot runs the following external link was found to be unavailable. Please check if the link is in fact down and fix or remove it in that case!
-- JeffGBot ( talk) 01:00, 20 June 2011 (UTC)
During several automated bot runs the following external link was found to be unavailable. Please check if the link is in fact down and fix or remove it in that case!
-- JeffGBot ( talk) 01:01, 20 June 2011 (UTC)
During several automated bot runs the following external link was found to be unavailable. Please check if the link is in fact down and fix or remove it in that case!
-- JeffGBot ( talk) 01:01, 20 June 2011 (UTC)
The result of the move request was: page moved. Vegaswikian ( talk) 20:40, 20 November 2011 (UTC)
ASEAN →
Association of Southeast Asian Nations – Relisted.
Vegaswikian (
talk) 00:20, 14 November 2011 (UTC) I would like to request that this page be moved back to "Association of Southeast Asian Nations". In November 2008, user
23prootie moved the article to ASEAN on the grounds that it's commonly used to the extent that ASEAN is now a "real word". While this may be the case in the Philippines to a certain extent (where the acronym ASEAN is used rather than its official name in English or even the name in Filipino), I'm doubtful that this is necessarily the case in other member countries. In addition, per
WP:ACRONYMTITLE, unless the subject is known exclusively by its acronym (which it is not), an article's title should not be abbreviated into its acronym. Similarly, other "ASEAN-like" organizations are not titled by their acronyms, and so for the sake of consistency, the article should be moved back to its full name. --
Sky Harbor (
talk)
12:31, 7 November 2011 (UTC)
In the section The ASEAN way, there is an outdated and therefore misleading quote that states that "no tension has escalated into armed confrontation among ASEAN member countries". Given that we have a page on the Cambodian–Thai border dispute and that dispute is ongoing and violent, should the quote be removed or a reference to this conflict added? Bern1005 ( talk) 12:03, 16 July 2012 (UTC)
GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Reviewer: Aircorn ( talk · contribs) 03:45, 30 November 2012 (UTC)
Fail I am sorry, but this was nominated with outstanding cleanup tags. I counted at least 9. According to the toolserver (may not be visible after it is failed) it has the following issues: Articles with dead external links (August 2011, August 2012, September 2010), Articles with unsourced statements (July 2012, June 2009, October 2012, September 2008), Articles with specifically marked weasel-worded phrases (July 2012), Articles with obsolete information (November 2012) These issues should be sorted out before nominating. Once they are fixed feel free to renominate. AIRcorn (talk) 03:45, 30 November 2012 (UTC)
The article states that were it a single entity, ASEAN would be the 10th largest economy in the world. It then goes on to list the 12 nations that would have larger economies... Shinigami27 ( talk) 01:14, 21 January 2013 (UTC)
Country | NUTS 1 | NUTS 2 | NUTS 2 | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
English | National | English | National | English | National | ||
Brunei | - | - | District | Daerah | Mukim | Mukim | |
Cambodia | Province | Khaet | District | Srouk | City and Village | Krong and Phum | |
Indonesia | Province | Provinsi | District | Distrik | City and Regency | Kota dan Kabupaten | |
Laos | Province | Khoueng | District | Muang | City and Village | ? and Baan | |
Malaysia | State and Federal territory | Negeri dan Wilayah Persekutuan | District | Daerah | City and Village | Bandaraya dan ? | |
Myanmar | State and Region | District | City and Township | ||||
Philippines | Province | Lalawigan | Region | Rehiyon | City and Municipality | Bayan | |
Singapore | - | - | Region | Town | |||
Thailand | Province | Changwat | District | Amphoe | City and Village | ||
Vietnam | Province | Tỉnh | District | Huyện | City and Municipality | Thành and ? |