This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
7 Aum Arivu article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
Archives: 1 |
This page is not a forum for general discussion about 7 Aum Arivu. Any such comments may be removed or refactored. Please limit discussion to improvement of this article. You may wish to ask factual questions about 7 Aum Arivu at the Reference desk. |
This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
This
edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
The Visual Effects were completed and handled by Makuta VFX, Hyderabad, not Legacy Effects as incorrectly reported. www.makutavfx.com
183.83.36.152 ( talk) 18:18, 30 May 2012 (UTC)
This
edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
Box Office: 98 crore [1] Jokerjam90 ( talk) 21:05, 7 June 2012 (UTC)
IMDB is unreliable. Kailash29792 ( talk) 02:55, 8 June 2012 (UTC)
Cant agree with you more websites like Kollyinsider and IMDB are a big non sense who have no idea on how box office works. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Pravin.murthy ( talk • contribs) 08:24, 3 April 2013 (UTC)
References
kart777 has vandalized this article by adding unreliable kollywoodinsider source ,pls revert it to the old proper version 122.174.31.137 ( talk) 08:59, 7 November 2012 (UTC)
In this edit I reverted good faith changes made by Rcrox in which he removed sourced content in favor of unsourced subjective fluff "the film was declared a hit at the box office". These assertions do not have any meaning to an encyclopedia because they are entirely subjective. Who declared it a hit? And what does "hit" mean? What we should be talking about is objective data. Gross vs. budget, marketing and distribution costs. Do we know what the actual profit was, or are we speculating? Phrases like "hit", "super-hit", "blockbuster" have no place in an encyclopedia. Cyphoidbomb ( talk) 15:47, 19 July 2015 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on 7aum Arivu. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 18 January 2022).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 10:00, 23 June 2017 (UTC)
it has collected more than 150cr — Preceding unsigned comment added by Sribinkr ( talk • contribs) 04:19, 14 March 2018 (UTC)
This
edit request to
7aum Arivu has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
2401:4900:3159:3491:299D:AC3:4B2F:C01F ( talk) 03:25, 8 June 2019 (UTC)90 =120
@ SuriyaCR7Fan and Billinghurst: Re: the back-and-forth about AP Herald / India Herald, I don't see any sort of information page at indiaherald.com that would suggest there is a clear editorial oversight. SuriyaCR7Fan, since you seem to be a staunch defender of this source, where can that information be found? Also to your point about it being registered with the government, I don't see anything when I search for it at http://rni.nic.in/. Not that being registered would automatically make it a reliable source, that would only mean that they announced their intention to be a newspaper. That'd be like saying a film must be a great movie because it was registered with the CBFC. Cyphoidbomb ( talk) 22:01, 13 January 2021 (UTC)
Multiple IPs from Kerala keep changing the format of the box office figures from the correct format, to an incorrect one.
MOS:CURRENCY clearly states
: "Ranges should be expressed giving the currency signifier just once: $250–300, not $250–$300."
Please stop using ₹ twice - thank you -
Arjayay (
talk) 12:59, 10 August 2021 (UTC)
This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
7 Aum Arivu article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
Archives: 1 |
This page is not a forum for general discussion about 7 Aum Arivu. Any such comments may be removed or refactored. Please limit discussion to improvement of this article. You may wish to ask factual questions about 7 Aum Arivu at the Reference desk. |
This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
This
edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
The Visual Effects were completed and handled by Makuta VFX, Hyderabad, not Legacy Effects as incorrectly reported. www.makutavfx.com
183.83.36.152 ( talk) 18:18, 30 May 2012 (UTC)
This
edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
Box Office: 98 crore [1] Jokerjam90 ( talk) 21:05, 7 June 2012 (UTC)
IMDB is unreliable. Kailash29792 ( talk) 02:55, 8 June 2012 (UTC)
Cant agree with you more websites like Kollyinsider and IMDB are a big non sense who have no idea on how box office works. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Pravin.murthy ( talk • contribs) 08:24, 3 April 2013 (UTC)
References
kart777 has vandalized this article by adding unreliable kollywoodinsider source ,pls revert it to the old proper version 122.174.31.137 ( talk) 08:59, 7 November 2012 (UTC)
In this edit I reverted good faith changes made by Rcrox in which he removed sourced content in favor of unsourced subjective fluff "the film was declared a hit at the box office". These assertions do not have any meaning to an encyclopedia because they are entirely subjective. Who declared it a hit? And what does "hit" mean? What we should be talking about is objective data. Gross vs. budget, marketing and distribution costs. Do we know what the actual profit was, or are we speculating? Phrases like "hit", "super-hit", "blockbuster" have no place in an encyclopedia. Cyphoidbomb ( talk) 15:47, 19 July 2015 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on 7aum Arivu. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 18 January 2022).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 10:00, 23 June 2017 (UTC)
it has collected more than 150cr — Preceding unsigned comment added by Sribinkr ( talk • contribs) 04:19, 14 March 2018 (UTC)
This
edit request to
7aum Arivu has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
2401:4900:3159:3491:299D:AC3:4B2F:C01F ( talk) 03:25, 8 June 2019 (UTC)90 =120
@ SuriyaCR7Fan and Billinghurst: Re: the back-and-forth about AP Herald / India Herald, I don't see any sort of information page at indiaherald.com that would suggest there is a clear editorial oversight. SuriyaCR7Fan, since you seem to be a staunch defender of this source, where can that information be found? Also to your point about it being registered with the government, I don't see anything when I search for it at http://rni.nic.in/. Not that being registered would automatically make it a reliable source, that would only mean that they announced their intention to be a newspaper. That'd be like saying a film must be a great movie because it was registered with the CBFC. Cyphoidbomb ( talk) 22:01, 13 January 2021 (UTC)
Multiple IPs from Kerala keep changing the format of the box office figures from the correct format, to an incorrect one.
MOS:CURRENCY clearly states
: "Ranges should be expressed giving the currency signifier just once: $250–300, not $250–$300."
Please stop using ₹ twice - thank you -
Arjayay (
talk) 12:59, 10 August 2021 (UTC)