This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

National Register of Historic Places Mid‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject National Register of Historic Places, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of U.S. historic sites listed on the National Register of Historic Places on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.National Register of Historic PlacesWikipedia:WikiProject National Register of Historic PlacesTemplate:WikiProject National Register of Historic PlacesNational Register of Historic Places articles Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale. New York City Mid‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject New York City, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of New York City-related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.New York CityWikipedia:WikiProject New York CityTemplate:WikiProject New York CityNew York City articles Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Hi, i noticed this article from noticing a related edit to a NRHP list-article in another state. To follow naming convention for NRHP places, I suggest moving this article from "Wallace Building (New York)" to "Wallace Building (New York, New York)". The more specific (City, State) form of disambiguation seems generally more precisely helpful, I think. Would it be okay if I moved it and updated links to here? doncram ( talk) 20:49, 21 April 2009 (UTC) reply

Either way is fine with me.-- Marcbela ( talk) 20:56, 21 April 2009 (UTC) reply

Good, and thanks. Renamed, and linking articles updated. Thanks also for starting the Wallace Building disambiguation page, which i revised in some other ways too, but it is most important just to get these started. doncram ( talk) 22:14, 21 April 2009 (UTC) reply