From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Article (
|
visual edit |
history ) ·
Article talk (
|
history ) ·
Watch
Reviewer:
Catlemur (
talk ·
contribs )
16:58, 24 October 2020 (UTC)
reply
I will begin the review shortly.--
Catlemur (
talk )
16:58, 24 October 2020 (UTC)
reply
Add Categories: Military units and formations disestablished in 1919 and 1919 disestablishments in the United Kingdom.
Added
EnigmaMcmxc (
talk )
02:02, 29 October 2020 (UTC)
reply
Break ref 55 into into separate ones.
Separated
EnigmaMcmxc (
talk )
02:02, 29 October 2020 (UTC)
reply
Use a comma instead of and in ref 163, for the sake of consistency.
Done
EnigmaMcmxc (
talk )
02:02, 29 October 2020 (UTC)
reply
with the aggressive German Empire→ Remove aggressive, I would argue that all empires at the time were aggressive to a certain degree.
Done
EnigmaMcmxc (
talk )
02:02, 29 October 2020 (UTC)
reply
What was the division's strength at formation?
I have added an extra line to state what the expected establishment was, and that it was not achieved across the board. I have not found seen a source stating what the division actually achieved (closest being what is the article stating how far below establishment it was).
EnigmaMcmxc (
talk )
02:02, 29 October 2020 (UTC)
reply
After a period out of the line resting→After a period of resting out of the line--
Catlemur (
talk )
19:37, 26 October 2020 (UTC)
reply
Changed
EnigmaMcmxc (
talk )
02:02, 29 October 2020 (UTC)
reply
Wikilink
creeping barrage
Link added
EnigmaMcmxc (
talk )
02:02, 29 October 2020 (UTC)
reply
"the 165th Brigade"
Fixed
EnigmaMcmxc (
talk )
02:02, 29 October 2020 (UTC)
reply
Throughout the article yards are converted to miles in some cases but not in others. This should be done consistently.
Updated to just meters.
EnigmaMcmxc (
talk )
02:02, 29 October 2020 (UTC)
reply
Is it comrades' association or Comrades Association?
"comrades' " is the term used by the source.
EnigmaMcmxc (
talk )
02:02, 29 October 2020 (UTC)
reply
practise→practice
British English verb
EnigmaMcmxc (
talk )
02:02, 29 October 2020 (UTC)
reply
Some image captions end in a full stop while others do not. This should be done consistently.
I have added some, where I believe they are appropriate. Some of the captions are not full sentences, and shouldn't have a period.
EnigmaMcmxc (
talk )
02:02, 29 October 2020 (UTC)
reply
Who's Who. London: A & C Black. 1910. → This source is not cited a single time in the article.
Updated, so it should now show in the references. It was previously used, but showed as "WW".
Thank you for your review. I have attempted to address the various points you have raised above.
EnigmaMcmxc (
talk )
02:02, 29 October 2020 (UTC)
reply
GA review (see
here for what the criteria are, and
here for what they are not)
It is reasonably well written .
a (prose, spelling, and grammar) : b (
MoS for
lead ,
layout ,
word choice ,
fiction , and
lists ) :
It is factually accurate and
verifiable .
a (
reference section ) : b (citations to
reliable sources ) : c (
OR ) : d (
copyvio and
plagiarism ) :
It is broad in its coverage .
a (
major aspects ) : b (
focused ) :
It follows the
neutral point of view policy .
Fair representation without bias :
It is stable .
No edit wars, etc. :
It is illustrated by
images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
a (images are tagged and non-free content have
fair use rationales ) : b (
appropriate use with
suitable captions ) :
Overall :
Pass/Fail : --
Catlemur (
talk )
18:45, 29 October 2020 (UTC)
reply