55th (West Lancashire) Division has been listed as one of the Warfare good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Article milestones Date Process Result October 29, 2020 Good article nominee Listed February 22, 2021 WikiProject A-class review Approved
Current status: Good article

This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Lancashire and Cumbria Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Lancashire and Cumbria, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Lancashire and Cumbria on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Lancashire and CumbriaWikipedia:WikiProject Lancashire and CumbriaTemplate:WikiProject Lancashire and CumbriaLancashire and Cumbria articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the importance scale. Military history: British / European / World War I A‑class This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles A This article has been rated as A-class on the project's quality scale. Associated task forces: /  British military history task force European military history task force World War I task force Additional information: /  This article has passed an A-Class review. Guild of Copy Editors This article was copy edited by Twofingered Typist, a member of the Guild of Copy Editors, on 20 October 2020.Guild of Copy EditorsWikipedia:WikiProject Guild of Copy EditorsTemplate:WikiProject Guild of Copy EditorsGuild of Copy Editors articles

Daily pageviews of this article A graph should have been displayed here but graphs are temporarily disabled. Until they are enabled again, visit the interactive graph at pageviews.wmcloud.org

@ EnigmaMcmxc: Good idea to split such a big article. Did a quick auto ed, cite scan and post-furlough drive-by references check. Regards Keith-264 ( talk) 09:07, 29 August 2020 (UTC) reply

It did get suggested a while back, but I was a little stubborn and thought I could cut it down enough. Finally had to bite the bullet! EnigmaMcmxc ( talk) 13:08, 29 August 2020 (UTC) reply