A fact from 500 Queer Scientists appeared on Wikipedia's
Main Page in the Did you know column on 22 April 2020 (
check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
This article is of interest to WikiProject LGBT studies, which tries to ensure comprehensive and factual coverage of all
LGBT-related issues on Wikipedia. For more information, or to get involved, please visit the
project page or contribute to the
discussion.LGBT studiesWikipedia:WikiProject LGBT studiesTemplate:WikiProject LGBT studiesLGBT articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Organizations, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
Organizations on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.OrganizationsWikipedia:WikiProject OrganizationsTemplate:WikiProject Organizationsorganization articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Science, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
Science on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ScienceWikipedia:WikiProject ScienceTemplate:WikiProject Sciencescience articles
This article is part of WikiProject Gender studies. This
WikiProject aims to improve the quality of articles dealing with gender studies and to remove systematic gender bias from Wikipedia. If you would like to participate in the project, you can choose to edit this article, or visit the
project page for more information.Gender studiesWikipedia:WikiProject Gender studiesTemplate:WikiProject Gender studiesGender studies articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject California, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the
U.S. state of California on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CaliforniaWikipedia:WikiProject CaliforniaTemplate:WikiProject CaliforniaCalifornia articles
The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as
this nomination's talk page,
the article's talk page or
Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by
Yoninah (
talk) 18:58, 16 April 2020 (UTC)reply
... that 500 Queer Scientists are "informally partnered" with
500 Women Scientists? Source: "Though an entirely separate group, 500 Queer Scientists found inspiration and a natural ally in the nonprofit 500 Women Scientists... these two groups have informally partnered"
[1]
ALT1:... that ...? Source: "You are strongly encouraged to quote the source text supporting each hook" (and [link] the source, or cite it briefly without using citation templates)
Comment: Possibly the main suggested hook is better without the quotes.
YorkshireLad ✿ (talk) 00:13, 21 March 2020 (UTC)reply
Moved to mainspace by
YorkshireLad (
talk). Self-nominated at 00:04, 21 March 2020 (UTC).reply
New enough, long enough, interesting and well-sourced. I agree that the hook works better without the quotation marks. Hook is interesting and cited in line, all looks good. And thank you for doing a review even when not needed :)
Kingsif (
talk) 17:34, 16 April 2020 (UTC)reply
A fact from 500 Queer Scientists appeared on Wikipedia's
Main Page in the Did you know column on 22 April 2020 (
check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
This article is of interest to WikiProject LGBT studies, which tries to ensure comprehensive and factual coverage of all
LGBT-related issues on Wikipedia. For more information, or to get involved, please visit the
project page or contribute to the
discussion.LGBT studiesWikipedia:WikiProject LGBT studiesTemplate:WikiProject LGBT studiesLGBT articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Organizations, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
Organizations on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.OrganizationsWikipedia:WikiProject OrganizationsTemplate:WikiProject Organizationsorganization articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Science, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
Science on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ScienceWikipedia:WikiProject ScienceTemplate:WikiProject Sciencescience articles
This article is part of WikiProject Gender studies. This
WikiProject aims to improve the quality of articles dealing with gender studies and to remove systematic gender bias from Wikipedia. If you would like to participate in the project, you can choose to edit this article, or visit the
project page for more information.Gender studiesWikipedia:WikiProject Gender studiesTemplate:WikiProject Gender studiesGender studies articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject California, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the
U.S. state of California on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CaliforniaWikipedia:WikiProject CaliforniaTemplate:WikiProject CaliforniaCalifornia articles
The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as
this nomination's talk page,
the article's talk page or
Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by
Yoninah (
talk) 18:58, 16 April 2020 (UTC)reply
... that 500 Queer Scientists are "informally partnered" with
500 Women Scientists? Source: "Though an entirely separate group, 500 Queer Scientists found inspiration and a natural ally in the nonprofit 500 Women Scientists... these two groups have informally partnered"
[1]
ALT1:... that ...? Source: "You are strongly encouraged to quote the source text supporting each hook" (and [link] the source, or cite it briefly without using citation templates)
Comment: Possibly the main suggested hook is better without the quotes.
YorkshireLad ✿ (talk) 00:13, 21 March 2020 (UTC)reply
Moved to mainspace by
YorkshireLad (
talk). Self-nominated at 00:04, 21 March 2020 (UTC).reply
New enough, long enough, interesting and well-sourced. I agree that the hook works better without the quotation marks. Hook is interesting and cited in line, all looks good. And thank you for doing a review even when not needed :)
Kingsif (
talk) 17:34, 16 April 2020 (UTC)reply