421-a tax exemption has been listed as one of the
Social sciences and society good articles under the
good article criteria. If you can improve it further,
please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can
reassess it. Review: August 4, 2018. ( Reviewed version). |
This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on 421-a tax abatement. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 09:27, 3 November 2017 (UTC)
GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Reviewer: Barkeep49 ( talk · contribs) 23:11, 3 July 2018 (UTC)
Good Article review progress box
|
a change from temporary subjection to those same lawscan this be made clearer?
Can PointsofNoReturn or other editor confirm they are interested in going through the GA review process? Best, Barkeep49 ( talk) 23:11, 3 July 2018 (UTC)
Hi, Barkeep49. I have replied to your points about improving the article and made changes in response to your points. Is there anything else you would like to go over? PointsofNoReturn ( talk) 17:45, 28 July 2018 (UTC)
Hi all - this article should focus on some more controversies, and add some of these sources:
421-a tax exemption has been listed as one of the
Social sciences and society good articles under the
good article criteria. If you can improve it further,
please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can
reassess it. Review: August 4, 2018. ( Reviewed version). |
This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on 421-a tax abatement. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 09:27, 3 November 2017 (UTC)
GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Reviewer: Barkeep49 ( talk · contribs) 23:11, 3 July 2018 (UTC)
Good Article review progress box
|
a change from temporary subjection to those same lawscan this be made clearer?
Can PointsofNoReturn or other editor confirm they are interested in going through the GA review process? Best, Barkeep49 ( talk) 23:11, 3 July 2018 (UTC)
Hi, Barkeep49. I have replied to your points about improving the article and made changes in response to your points. Is there anything else you would like to go over? PointsofNoReturn ( talk) 17:45, 28 July 2018 (UTC)
Hi all - this article should focus on some more controversies, and add some of these sources: