![]() | This is the
talk page of a
redirect that targets the page: • Timeline of the far future Because this page is not frequently watched, present and future discussions, edit requests and requested moves should take place at: • Talk:Timeline of the far future |
![]() | This redirect does not require a rating on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
There is a move discussion in progress on Talk:1st millennium which affects this page. Please participate on that page and not in this talk page section. Thank you. — RMCD bot 23:30, 3 March 2016 (UTC)
Here's my (more detailed) rationale for removing this entry:
While the cited article may be useful for better understanding the impact of increasing levels on sea level rise, it's not useful for making any kind of specific prediction about what sea level will actually be 1000 years from now. And related to the third point above, the paper (understandably) neglects the possibility of any future geoengineering. -- Deacon Vorbis ( talk) 15:49, 11 May 2017 (UTC)
On why that prediction should be removed...The assumption that world economic growth will hold steady at 1.4% has not held true since 2006, and there's no way any model could possibly predict that it's "almost certain" to do so (the standard required at WP:CRYSTAL) for over 1000 years. And in addition to that it would have to be "almost certain" that power output will correlate with economic growth and that society in 1000 will care about interstellar travel and not blown itself to bits or bombed itself back to the stone age. And that all these things are "almost certain" to happen in 1000 years and not 500 or 2000. -- Beland ( talk) 00:40, 1 October 2020 (UTC)
![]() | This is the
talk page of a
redirect that targets the page: • Timeline of the far future Because this page is not frequently watched, present and future discussions, edit requests and requested moves should take place at: • Talk:Timeline of the far future |
![]() | This redirect does not require a rating on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
There is a move discussion in progress on Talk:1st millennium which affects this page. Please participate on that page and not in this talk page section. Thank you. — RMCD bot 23:30, 3 March 2016 (UTC)
Here's my (more detailed) rationale for removing this entry:
While the cited article may be useful for better understanding the impact of increasing levels on sea level rise, it's not useful for making any kind of specific prediction about what sea level will actually be 1000 years from now. And related to the third point above, the paper (understandably) neglects the possibility of any future geoengineering. -- Deacon Vorbis ( talk) 15:49, 11 May 2017 (UTC)
On why that prediction should be removed...The assumption that world economic growth will hold steady at 1.4% has not held true since 2006, and there's no way any model could possibly predict that it's "almost certain" to do so (the standard required at WP:CRYSTAL) for over 1000 years. And in addition to that it would have to be "almost certain" that power output will correlate with economic growth and that society in 1000 will care about interstellar travel and not blown itself to bits or bombed itself back to the stone age. And that all these things are "almost certain" to happen in 1000 years and not 500 or 2000. -- Beland ( talk) 00:40, 1 October 2020 (UTC)