![]() | 220 Central Park South has been listed as one of the
Art and architecture good articles under the
good article criteria. If you can improve it further,
please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can
reassess it. Review: February 4, 2021. ( Reviewed version). |
![]() | A fact from 220 Central Park South appeared on Wikipedia's
Main Page in the
Did you know column on 11 November 2020 (
check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
| ![]() |
![]() | This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
The result was: promoted by
Yoninah (
talk)
18:41, 8 November 2020 (UTC)
5x expanded by Epicgenius ( talk). Self-nominated at 23:05, 29 October 2020 (UTC).
General: Article is new enough and long enough |
---|
Policy: Article is sourced, neutral, and free of copyright problems |
---|
|
Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation |
---|
|
Image: Image is freely licensed, used in the article, and clear at 100px. |
---|
|
QPQ: Done. |
Overall:
epicgenius, I’ve completed my review of this article and the hooks and find that they meet or exceed DYK criteria. I confirmed the article’s 5x expansion, which began on 27 Oct, and is now at 17693 characters (2889 words) compared to 2834 characters (466 words) on 4 Oct. The hook image is licensed CC BY-SA 4.0, and the other images in the article are licensed CC BY-SA 4.0 and CC BY-SA 3.0. While I assess that all hooks are “hooky,” have verifiable content from reliable sources, and are of an appropriate length, I prefer the original hook.
West Virginian
(talk)
13:19, 30 October 2020 (UTC)
GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Reviewer: Elliot321 ( talk · contribs) 18:51, 3 February 2021 (UTC)
I'll review this article, first impressions are pretty good. Expect a full review soon. Elliot321 ( talk | contribs) 18:51, 3 February 2021 (UTC)
GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria
@ WPmurphy: In relation to your edit summary here, I was referring to your edit here. Your edit summary was "220 Central Park South (225 W 58th St) is locted north of Central Park Tower (225 W 57th St) so it blocks the view from the CPT to the north not to the south". This is correct, I wasn't disputing it.
Your edit changed "south" to "north" in the following sentence: Additionally, Vornado had to settle a dispute with
Extell, which owned a garage on the site and had expressed concern that Vornado's structure would block views of Extell's
Central Park Tower directly to the south
. You changed it to Central Park Tower directly to the north
. So this was where the ambiguity arose, because there's 2 ways of interpreting this:
I hope this clears up the sequence of edits. Epicgenius ( talk) 21:51, 20 August 2021 (UTC)
Ofer Yardeni has sold his apartment at 220 Central Park South. He should be removed as an owner. Please see article below from The Real Deal.
[1] https://therealdeal.com/new-york/2023/02/27/yardeni-scores-12m-profit-on-220-cps-sale/ 38.109.68.251 ( talk) 23:52, 27 February 2023 (UTC)
![]() | 220 Central Park South has been listed as one of the
Art and architecture good articles under the
good article criteria. If you can improve it further,
please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can
reassess it. Review: February 4, 2021. ( Reviewed version). |
![]() | A fact from 220 Central Park South appeared on Wikipedia's
Main Page in the
Did you know column on 11 November 2020 (
check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
| ![]() |
![]() | This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
The result was: promoted by
Yoninah (
talk)
18:41, 8 November 2020 (UTC)
5x expanded by Epicgenius ( talk). Self-nominated at 23:05, 29 October 2020 (UTC).
General: Article is new enough and long enough |
---|
Policy: Article is sourced, neutral, and free of copyright problems |
---|
|
Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation |
---|
|
Image: Image is freely licensed, used in the article, and clear at 100px. |
---|
|
QPQ: Done. |
Overall:
epicgenius, I’ve completed my review of this article and the hooks and find that they meet or exceed DYK criteria. I confirmed the article’s 5x expansion, which began on 27 Oct, and is now at 17693 characters (2889 words) compared to 2834 characters (466 words) on 4 Oct. The hook image is licensed CC BY-SA 4.0, and the other images in the article are licensed CC BY-SA 4.0 and CC BY-SA 3.0. While I assess that all hooks are “hooky,” have verifiable content from reliable sources, and are of an appropriate length, I prefer the original hook.
West Virginian
(talk)
13:19, 30 October 2020 (UTC)
GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Reviewer: Elliot321 ( talk · contribs) 18:51, 3 February 2021 (UTC)
I'll review this article, first impressions are pretty good. Expect a full review soon. Elliot321 ( talk | contribs) 18:51, 3 February 2021 (UTC)
GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria
@ WPmurphy: In relation to your edit summary here, I was referring to your edit here. Your edit summary was "220 Central Park South (225 W 58th St) is locted north of Central Park Tower (225 W 57th St) so it blocks the view from the CPT to the north not to the south". This is correct, I wasn't disputing it.
Your edit changed "south" to "north" in the following sentence: Additionally, Vornado had to settle a dispute with
Extell, which owned a garage on the site and had expressed concern that Vornado's structure would block views of Extell's
Central Park Tower directly to the south
. You changed it to Central Park Tower directly to the north
. So this was where the ambiguity arose, because there's 2 ways of interpreting this:
I hope this clears up the sequence of edits. Epicgenius ( talk) 21:51, 20 August 2021 (UTC)
Ofer Yardeni has sold his apartment at 220 Central Park South. He should be removed as an owner. Please see article below from The Real Deal.
[1] https://therealdeal.com/new-york/2023/02/27/yardeni-scores-12m-profit-on-220-cps-sale/ 38.109.68.251 ( talk) 23:52, 27 February 2023 (UTC)