This article is within the scope of WikiProject Connecticut, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
Connecticut on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ConnecticutWikipedia:WikiProject ConnecticutTemplate:WikiProject ConnecticutConnecticut articles
This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a
list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the
full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles
This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the
United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions.
G'day, the infobox says that the unit existed between 1862 and 1863, but the body of the article doesn't mention when the regiment was disbanded. Is it possible to add this in? Cheers,
AustralianRupert (
talk) 02:35, 29 December 2011 (UTC)reply
I added the dates of it being active. I was questioning it myself in my head if it was still active or when it was disbanded. Those dates were from the article of being in the
American Civil War ... I thought they were important enough to be in the Infobox as being "active".
Adamdaley (
talk) 04:57, 29 December 2011 (UTC)reply
G'day, Adam, I've found some information on the unit here:
[1] I believe that it's an electronic reproduction of Dyer's Compendium. It provides a "muster out" date of 13 June 1865. The date it provides for "organization" is 8 September 1862, though, which is inconsistent with what this article currently says (July 1862). Regards,
AustralianRupert (
talk) 07:31, 29 December 2011 (UTC)reply
They are the books I am waiting on by they are a reprint (I am assuming a reprint) from 1959. Should get them next month hopefully.
Adamdaley (
talk) 22:39, 29 December 2011 (UTC)reply
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Connecticut, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
Connecticut on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ConnecticutWikipedia:WikiProject ConnecticutTemplate:WikiProject ConnecticutConnecticut articles
This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a
list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the
full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles
This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the
United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions.
G'day, the infobox says that the unit existed between 1862 and 1863, but the body of the article doesn't mention when the regiment was disbanded. Is it possible to add this in? Cheers,
AustralianRupert (
talk) 02:35, 29 December 2011 (UTC)reply
I added the dates of it being active. I was questioning it myself in my head if it was still active or when it was disbanded. Those dates were from the article of being in the
American Civil War ... I thought they were important enough to be in the Infobox as being "active".
Adamdaley (
talk) 04:57, 29 December 2011 (UTC)reply
G'day, Adam, I've found some information on the unit here:
[1] I believe that it's an electronic reproduction of Dyer's Compendium. It provides a "muster out" date of 13 June 1865. The date it provides for "organization" is 8 September 1862, though, which is inconsistent with what this article currently says (July 1862). Regards,
AustralianRupert (
talk) 07:31, 29 December 2011 (UTC)reply
They are the books I am waiting on by they are a reprint (I am assuming a reprint) from 1959. Should get them next month hopefully.
Adamdaley (
talk) 22:39, 29 December 2011 (UTC)reply